Which transactional in-house gig would have better QOL/pay -- FAANG/bigtech or IB? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428454
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Which transactional in-house gig would have better QOL/pay -- FAANG/bigtech or IB?
I'm a 5th year making some strategic decisions re: bailing from biglaw and want to get a better sense of which industry is likely to suck less/pay more. Would love to hear any insights anyone has
-
- Posts: 428454
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which transactional in-house gig would have better QOL/pay -- FAANG/bigtech or IB?
Bumping because interested to see these exit options compared head-to-head
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 11:09 am
Re: Which transactional in-house gig would have better QOL/pay -- FAANG/bigtech or IB?
What practice group are you in OP?
-
- Posts: 428454
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which transactional in-house gig would have better QOL/pay -- FAANG/bigtech or IB?
OP here. I'm in lender-side finance.
-
- Posts: 428454
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which transactional in-house gig would have better QOL/pay -- FAANG/bigtech or IB?
As far as I have heard, QoL varies a lot between the different FAANG companies and within big tech generally. Eg, Amazon has a reputation as an awful place to work, but Google has a reputation as a good place to be a lawyer. My sense is FAANG pays something like $275k salary, $325-350k all-in for mid/early senior associates, but there are a lot more data points if you search this site.
I work at a tech company with ~$100 billion market cap in a specialty role, and my starting salary leaving as a 5th year associate was ~$200k cash, $250k/yr all in including RSUs/bonus. (It has ended up being worth a lot more because tech stock has done amazingly this year, but you can’t assume that.) The job is super chill, genuine 9-5 in terms of actual hours worked.
Can’t speak to IB, but can’t imagine the QoL is better than tech on average.
I work at a tech company with ~$100 billion market cap in a specialty role, and my starting salary leaving as a 5th year associate was ~$200k cash, $250k/yr all in including RSUs/bonus. (It has ended up being worth a lot more because tech stock has done amazingly this year, but you can’t assume that.) The job is super chill, genuine 9-5 in terms of actual hours worked.
Can’t speak to IB, but can’t imagine the QoL is better than tech on average.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428454
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which transactional in-house gig would have better QOL/pay -- FAANG/bigtech or IB?
Did you learn everything on the job like biglaw or are actual skills required on day 1?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 7:24 pmAs far as I have heard, QoL varies a lot between the different FAANG companies and within big tech generally. Eg, Amazon has a reputation as an awful place to work, but Google has a reputation as a good place to be a lawyer. My sense is FAANG pays something like $275k salary, $325-350k all-in for mid/early senior associates, but there are a lot more data points if you search this site.
I work at a tech company with ~$100 billion market cap in a specialty role, and my starting salary leaving as a 5th year associate was ~$200k cash, $250k/yr all in including RSUs/bonus. (It has ended up being worth a lot more because tech stock has done amazingly this year, but you can’t assume that.) The job is super chill, genuine 9-5 in terms of actual hours worked.
Can’t speak to IB, but can’t imagine the QoL is better than tech on average.
-
- Posts: 428454
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which transactional in-house gig would have better QOL/pay -- FAANG/bigtech or IB?
My Biglaw job was about a third focused on the specialty area, so I definitely came in with a lot of substantive knowledge, and that was necessary to get hired. For something more generalist, like product counsel/AGC, it’s inevitable that there will be big chunks of the job you haven’t dealt with before, though, if you’re getting hired straight from a firm.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 9:09 pmDid you learn everything on the job like biglaw or are actual skills required on day 1?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 7:24 pmAs far as I have heard, QoL varies a lot between the different FAANG companies and within big tech generally. Eg, Amazon has a reputation as an awful place to work, but Google has a reputation as a good place to be a lawyer. My sense is FAANG pays something like $275k salary, $325-350k all-in for mid/early senior associates, but there are a lot more data points if you search this site.
I work at a tech company with ~$100 billion market cap in a specialty role, and my starting salary leaving as a 5th year associate was ~$200k cash, $250k/yr all in including RSUs/bonus. (It has ended up being worth a lot more because tech stock has done amazingly this year, but you can’t assume that.) The job is super chill, genuine 9-5 in terms of actual hours worked.
Can’t speak to IB, but can’t imagine the QoL is better than tech on average.