Page 1 of 1

Big law or lit boutique for a 1st year?

Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2020 1:41 pm
by Anonymous User
For a first year, what is a better choice? A litigation boutique (not widely known by younger associates, but senior associates I speak to all know the name and speak highly) or a firm like Quinn/Sull Crom?

Re: Big law or lit boutique for a 1st year?

Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2020 1:44 pm
by The Lsat Airbender
Depends on your long-term goals, location, whether the boutique is above-market... you're basically asking how long is a piece of string here.

Re: Big law or lit boutique for a 1st year?

Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2020 1:48 pm
by Anonymous User
OP here, boutique pays market + a slightly larger bonus than market

Re: Big law or lit boutique for a 1st year?

Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2020 5:13 pm
by The Lsat Airbender
If you truly don't have any preferences about your career in either the short or long-term, might as well go with the higher all-in comp. I'd think about this a bit harder, though. We can't tell you what to want.

Re: Big law or lit boutique for a 1st year?

Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2020 5:24 pm
by moxcoal
I concur with the idea of picking larger comp. But separately, one downside with boutiques that I personally took for granted is the relative lack of support staff. I'm unsure if this feeling is amplified or lessened for junior attorneys.