Sidley Austin v. Sheppard Mullin (LA) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
tentativeruling
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2019 7:04 pm
Sidley Austin v. Sheppard Mullin (LA)
Interested in corporate/transactional/RE. Was offered a Sidley Diversity Scholarship as well.
-
M458
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 5:58 pm
Re: Sidley Austin v. Sheppard Mullin (LA)
If you really liked Sheppard, I could maybe see an argument for going there, but the Diversity Scholarship makes this kind of a no-brainer. You never know if you'll even like big law, and $20k makes this decision a bit of a no-brainer.
-
LawSchoolLA23
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 2:40 am
Re: Sidley Austin v. Sheppard Mullin (LA)
If those are your two choices, I would definitely pick Sidley. It seems like they are really growing their corporate practice and based on my interactions with their associates they seem to be pretty normal. Shepherd just doesn't have a big presence in LA. You can't go wrong with either, but Sidley seems to be bigger in LA.
