Dream car on a big law salary
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 3:49 pm
After paying off loans, have any of you bought your dream car? If so, what car and do you have any regrets on buying it?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=300635
this is the smartest thing i have seen in a while.Anonymous User wrote:A DeLorean to go back in time and not go to law school
If you've paid off your loans, it's not absurd to get a car you like (within reason). Just make sure the payoff is worth it to you.Anonymous User wrote:After paying off loans, have any of you bought your dream car? If so, what car and do you have any regrets on buying it?
Anonymous User wrote:A DeLorean to go back in time and not go to law school
The ticket thing is annoying. When I had a sports car known for attracting police attention, I definitely got far more tickets when prior I had never gotten pulled over.nealric wrote:The Subaru WRX STI's are very staid looking. I'm guessing 9/10 people will not know it's capability or the fact that it's a rally car. It looks like any other Subaru sedan with slight alterations. I'm guessing an even higher percentage of Attorneys, especially older ones into their BMWs/Porsches have no clue about the car's capability, and assume it's just a 4-door passenger car.Anonymous User wrote: I bought a WRX STI after my loans were paid off (previously drove sub $10k cars). It isn't my "dream car" per-se (I will probably never be able to afford a 1969 Alfa Romeo Tipo 33 Stradale at $10 million +), but it's a car I lusted after when they first came to the U.S. while I was in college. It wasn't really a huge financial commitment relative to income, though it's hardly looked at as appropriate for a staid tax lawyer. I also bought an 80s Alfa Romeo Spider to tinker on.
Unless you have a body kit and custom paint job, then awesome.
gogu wrote:Yeah, bought an M3 (series/package/color/year that many M3 owners including me consider to be the best) -- truly my dream car (I still dream about it). Then I realized parts/maintenance/tickets/insurance are expensive, it was a bad decision financially, traffic in my region sucks, and I don't have time to track it as much as I'd like.
I suppose it depends on where you live and drive. I drove a red Miata and never got pulled over. The WRX STI has a big wing on it and is also bright red- I've never been pulled over. Come to think of it, I haven't been pulled over in more than a decade. I don't drive like grandma, but I'm strategic about when I get on it. I can get my real jollies on the track.Aptitude wrote:The ticket thing is annoying. When I had a sports car known for attracting police attention, I definitely got far more tickets when prior I had never gotten pulled over.nealric wrote:The Subaru WRX STI's are very staid looking. I'm guessing 9/10 people will not know it's capability or the fact that it's a rally car. It looks like any other Subaru sedan with slight alterations. I'm guessing an even higher percentage of Attorneys, especially older ones into their BMWs/Porsches have no clue about the car's capability, and assume it's just a 4-door passenger car.Anonymous User wrote: I bought a WRX STI after my loans were paid off (previously drove sub $10k cars). It isn't my "dream car" per-se (I will probably never be able to afford a 1969 Alfa Romeo Tipo 33 Stradale at $10 million +), but it's a car I lusted after when they first came to the U.S. while I was in college. It wasn't really a huge financial commitment relative to income, though it's hardly looked at as appropriate for a staid tax lawyer. I also bought an 80s Alfa Romeo Spider to tinker on.
Unless you have a body kit and custom paint job, then awesome.
gogu wrote:Yeah, bought an M3 (series/package/color/year that many M3 owners including me consider to be the best) -- truly my dream car (I still dream about it). Then I realized parts/maintenance/tickets/insurance are expensive, it was a bad decision financially, traffic in my region sucks, and I don't have time to track it as much as I'd like.
Basically, if you have a sports car that attracts attention, it doesn't even need to be a luxury sports car, it can be a red Honda Civic coupe, a Miata or old Camaro, and you can't really have that much fun with it on the road or you'll get pulled over. I drive the same in my truck as I do in my sports car, and no tickets. I get the comments from the officer that tickets too, "You think just because you drive a sports car....."
That's where the huge advantage of regular looking Japanese cars like the Subaru WRX or Honda Civic Type-R come in. They look like regular 4 door sedans to the vast majority of people. Which is why I love them - European cars are too showy. Love the humbleness and high performance of a good Honda.
I drive very reasonably too. It wasn't as if I was doing burnouts in the middle of a road on a Mustang or drifting in a GT-R.nealric wrote:I suppose it depends on where you live and drive. I drove a red Miata and never got pulled over. The WRX STI has a big wing on it and is also bright red- I've never been pulled over. Come to think of it, I haven't been pulled over in more than a decade. I don't drive like grandma, but I'm strategic about when I get on it. I can get my real jollies on the track.Aptitude wrote:The ticket thing is annoying. When I had a sports car known for attracting police attention, I definitely got far more tickets when prior I had never gotten pulled over.nealric wrote:The Subaru WRX STI's are very staid looking. I'm guessing 9/10 people will not know it's capability or the fact that it's a rally car. It looks like any other Subaru sedan with slight alterations. I'm guessing an even higher percentage of Attorneys, especially older ones into their BMWs/Porsches have no clue about the car's capability, and assume it's just a 4-door passenger car.Anonymous User wrote: I bought a WRX STI after my loans were paid off (previously drove sub $10k cars). It isn't my "dream car" per-se (I will probably never be able to afford a 1969 Alfa Romeo Tipo 33 Stradale at $10 million +), but it's a car I lusted after when they first came to the U.S. while I was in college. It wasn't really a huge financial commitment relative to income, though it's hardly looked at as appropriate for a staid tax lawyer. I also bought an 80s Alfa Romeo Spider to tinker on.
Unless you have a body kit and custom paint job, then awesome.
gogu wrote:Yeah, bought an M3 (series/package/color/year that many M3 owners including me consider to be the best) -- truly my dream car (I still dream about it). Then I realized parts/maintenance/tickets/insurance are expensive, it was a bad decision financially, traffic in my region sucks, and I don't have time to track it as much as I'd like.
Basically, if you have a sports car that attracts attention, it doesn't even need to be a luxury sports car, it can be a red Honda Civic coupe, a Miata or old Camaro, and you can't really have that much fun with it on the road or you'll get pulled over. I drive the same in my truck as I do in my sports car, and no tickets. I get the comments from the officer that tickets too, "You think just because you drive a sports car....."
That's where the huge advantage of regular looking Japanese cars like the Subaru WRX or Honda Civic Type-R come in. They look like regular 4 door sedans to the vast majority of people. Which is why I love them - European cars are too showy. Love the humbleness and high performance of a good Honda.
It's a widely misunderstood car by non-car people, and even by many car people who don't drive on the track. They don't have much power and look "cute," so people often think they aren't a serious sports car. But they are far and away the most raced car in amateur wheel-to-wheel road racing- and for a good reason. Cheap consumables (brakes/tires/fuel), easy parts availability, and fantastic support means you are much more likely to be driving rather than working on your car in the pits. The chassis is well balanced, gives good feedback, and rewards smooth inputs. If you bin it, new chassis are available for next to nothing (mostly because of the large sales numbers from the sorts of folks that give the car its "chick car" reputation). They are also most people's first recommendation for someone looking to learn driving on the track. The lack of power keeps you from covering up mistakes with throttle.Aptitude wrote:I drive very reasonably too. It wasn't as if I was doing burnouts in the middle of a road on a Mustang or drifting in a GT-R.nealric wrote:I suppose it depends on where you live and drive. I drove a red Miata and never got pulled over. The WRX STI has a big wing on it and is also bright red- I've never been pulled over. Come to think of it, I haven't been pulled over in more than a decade. I don't drive like grandma, but I'm strategic about when I get on it. I can get my real jollies on the track.Aptitude wrote:The ticket thing is annoying. When I had a sports car known for attracting police attention, I definitely got far more tickets when prior I had never gotten pulled over.nealric wrote:The Subaru WRX STI's are very staid looking. I'm guessing 9/10 people will not know it's capability or the fact that it's a rally car. It looks like any other Subaru sedan with slight alterations. I'm guessing an even higher percentage of Attorneys, especially older ones into their BMWs/Porsches have no clue about the car's capability, and assume it's just a 4-door passenger car.Anonymous User wrote: I bought a WRX STI after my loans were paid off (previously drove sub $10k cars). It isn't my "dream car" per-se (I will probably never be able to afford a 1969 Alfa Romeo Tipo 33 Stradale at $10 million +), but it's a car I lusted after when they first came to the U.S. while I was in college. It wasn't really a huge financial commitment relative to income, though it's hardly looked at as appropriate for a staid tax lawyer. I also bought an 80s Alfa Romeo Spider to tinker on.
Unless you have a body kit and custom paint job, then awesome.
gogu wrote:Yeah, bought an M3 (series/package/color/year that many M3 owners including me consider to be the best) -- truly my dream car (I still dream about it). Then I realized parts/maintenance/tickets/insurance are expensive, it was a bad decision financially, traffic in my region sucks, and I don't have time to track it as much as I'd like.
Basically, if you have a sports car that attracts attention, it doesn't even need to be a luxury sports car, it can be a red Honda Civic coupe, a Miata or old Camaro, and you can't really have that much fun with it on the road or you'll get pulled over. I drive the same in my truck as I do in my sports car, and no tickets. I get the comments from the officer that tickets too, "You think just because you drive a sports car....."
That's where the huge advantage of regular looking Japanese cars like the Subaru WRX or Honda Civic Type-R come in. They look like regular 4 door sedans to the vast majority of people. Which is why I love them - European cars are too showy. Love the humbleness and high performance of a good Honda.
Did you like the Miata? It's generally considered a chick car, even among JDM fans. Never understood that rep, I've always thought it was one of the best cars for the money. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1qgtCt1jG0
If I got a Mazda it would be if they released another RX. Was a big fan of the RX-8.nealric wrote: will probably own another Miata again- likely a spec Miata for racing. Failing that, I plan on getting another for a daily when I no longer have kids to haul. If the daily option, I'd love a LS-swapped one. 400+hp in a 2,300lb car will shut the haters up pretty quick
Unfortunately, the chances of a new RX are slim to none. They are fantastic race engines, but poor street engines.Aptitude wrote:If I got a Mazda it would be if they released another RX. Was a big fan of the RX-8.nealric wrote: will probably own another Miata again- likely a spec Miata for racing. Failing that, I plan on getting another for a daily when I no longer have kids to haul. If the daily option, I'd love a LS-swapped one. 400+hp in a 2,300lb car will shut the haters up pretty quick
Fun fact, Mazda won Le Mans over all the European brands like Porsche, Ferrari, Audi, McLaren. After, Mazda's Le Mans win, they disallowed Mazda's rotary engine from future races. Then it was all the European manufacturers winning again for years after.![]()
Mazda made some great cars. I would love for the RX to come back. IMO, the best sports car within that price range.
The Accord is better anyways. And you can make that Honda much more enjoyable than the BMW. You can have a lot of fun with your Accord.turbotong wrote:I bought a gently used bmw 4 series convertible. I enjoy it. A little pricey, but I've earned it. Once I drive it into the ground, I may go back to a Honda Accord.
more fun to drive a slow car fast, than a fast car slow.turbotong wrote:I bought a gently used bmw 4 series convertible. I enjoy it. A little pricey, but I've earned it. Once I drive it into the ground, I may go back to a Honda Accord.
Driving a fast car fast is even more fundabigchina wrote:more fun to drive a slow car fast, than a fast car slow.turbotong wrote:I bought a gently used bmw 4 series convertible. I enjoy it. A little pricey, but I've earned it. Once I drive it into the ground, I may go back to a Honda Accord.
also, v6 accords are ridiculously fast nowadays.
I'd go Exige S if I were to buy a Lotus. The supercharger gives it the necessary oomph the non-supercharged Elise is missing and the mohawk intake makes it look like a proper exotic. I had one in my garage for a year (storing it for a friend but I had the keys to drive it from time to time). It's absolutely atrocious as a daily driver- your eyes are level with the tops of the wheels on economy cars and large SUVs loom over you like monster trucks. Getting in/out is a gymnastic feat. But there's few other things on four wheels with the same visceral thrill. Great car, but only as a second/third/nth car for the weekends, country drives, and track days.onionz wrote:Lotus Elise, hands down.
I don't see a lot of Accords, or Hondas among attorneys in my area. I usually run into many BMWs, Volvos, and Mercedes. I see a sizable amount of Teslas and Toyota Priuses among solos and small firm attorneys. Subarus and Jeeps are quite popular. I haven't seen a modified Honda in a very long time anywhere - I saw a Civic Type R last month and was amazed.nealric wrote:
But tying this all back to legal employment: Both Accords and non-M BMW 3/4 series really fulfill the same niche: they are like the anonymous business casual outfit in biglaw- nobody will remember your car if you drive either. I think for most normal folks, that's a good thing.
Seriously though, have you driven one? There's no real way to enter/exit gracefully.icansortofmath wrote:I think a solid color (black or gunmetal or something like that) works fine with well fitted suits.
Lotus Elise isn’t even that expensive. As long as it’s not bubblegum pink or lipstick red so entire firm would see your car in the parking lot from windows and make you the “guy that drives that obnoxious sports car,” a lotus Elise should be an appropriate car for a biglaw associate.