SRZ vs. Dechert Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428552
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
SRZ vs. Dechert
leaning litigation but open to corporate work and want to move out of NYC. thanks!
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428552
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SRZ vs. Dechert
could those voting explain why?
-
BrainsyK
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 5:37 am
Re: SRZ vs. Dechert
One of them lays off first years. Guess which.Anonymous User wrote:could those voting explain why?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428552
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SRZ vs. Dechert
yeah, my concern was weighing that against SRZ doing mainly hedge fund work and having a smaller lit/corp practice.BrainsyK wrote:One of them lays off first years. Guess which.Anonymous User wrote:could those voting explain why?
-
Wild Card
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 6:48 pm
Re: SRZ vs. Dechert
Incidentally, what does that mean? My firm routinely lays off juniors 1 year and 7 months after they start. Are those first-years?BrainsyK wrote:One of them lays off first years. Guess which.Anonymous User wrote:could those voting explain why?
-
BrainsyK
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 5:37 am
Re: SRZ vs. Dechert
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=278041Wild Card wrote:Incidentally, what does that mean? My firm routinely lays off juniors 1 year and 7 months after they start. Are those first-years?BrainsyK wrote:One of them lays off first years. Guess which.Anonymous User wrote:could those voting explain why?
https://abovethelaw.com/2017/05/dechert ... he-future/
Read more above. I think first-year means before you've completely stub year + 12 months. I was under the impression that most financially stable firms will generally give people 2 years short of egregious circumstances. I could be wrong. Either way, Dechert is probably not a great place to be since according to the thread, people are put on lists to be fired before they're even finished studying for the bar.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
