Latham vs Kirkland vs STB vs DPW
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2018 10:53 am
Interested in corporate/transactional work (Cap markets, M&A). Deciding between Latham, Kirkland, STB, DPW.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=297362
I think this is a bit misleading—DPW has been growing their PE practice and STB does lots of strategic m&a (to be clear, the PE vs public m&a distinction makes no sense—it’s private vs public or PE vs strategic, and even then the lines are less clear than people would have you believe).Anonymous User wrote:For capital markets or public M&A, Davis Polk. For PE/real estate, Simpson.
Kirkland is definitely on par with these firms in terms of reputation and deal volume. However, it’s also an absolutely terrible place to work, whereas DPW and STB are at least somewhat humane within the realm of elite NY corporate big law. (Not necessarily in terms of hours, but culture.)
From speaking with and knowing both STB and KE associates, in no way should you think STB is better place to work than KE—especially for corporate. STB corporate associates are getting crushed. The hours seem just as brutal at both places and the partners just as shitty. I would to see OP here pick STB thinking it’d be more humane that KE.Anonymous User wrote:For capital markets or public M&A, Davis Polk. For PE/real estate, Simpson.
Kirkland is definitely on par with these firms in terms of reputation and deal volume. However, it’s also an absolutely terrible place to work, whereas DPW and STB are at least somewhat humane within the realm of elite NY corporate big law. (Not necessarily in terms of hours, but culture.)