V5 vs. non-traditional opportunity re: recession
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2018 10:22 am
Thanks!
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=296589
Lol. This is true to the extent that 2 years as an associate at at a V10 can get you any legal job you want. As in, yeah you will be in the running for lots of jobs that other people would kill for, but it’s not a magical pass after 2 years into a world of amazing jobs. One of my best undergrad friends went to b school when I was at law school. He ground for 4 years at McKinsey, finally made the move across into banking, realized it was just another grind against attrition, and is now doing strategic consulting at a boutique for 65% of what I make as a 6th year, working just as hard - maybe slightly fewer fire drills.$$$$$$ wrote:
2 years as an associate at MBB can get you pretty much any business job you want, including private equity, hedge funds, banking, strategy, etc.
this is completely fucking wrong RE hedge funds, private equity, banking. the window for jumping into HF/PE from MBB is pre-MBA - you do two years and then you jump to the same sort of PE role that investment banking analysts do (and that's an uphill battle too). if you're a JD, you're entering as a post-MBA consultant along with like 30 other people from you business school. the people they're hiring at OP's level at PE/HF are people from HBS/GSB who already worked in HF/PE before b-school, and even those guys don't always get buy-side jobs after graduation. it's insanely competitive, to the extent that PE associates at KKR and shit are forgoing b-school because they're worried that they won't be able to get back into the industry once they leave. maybe MBB could get an operations (non-investing) role at a fund, working with portfolio co's, but that's very different, compensation and role-wise, than an investing one - you're basically an in-house consultant. and I don't see why it'd be any easier, or more attractive, to do that rather than work as a JD and move over from private funds to work for a GC. unless you like business. in which case, why leave MBB.$$$$$$ wrote: 2 years as an associate at MBB can get you pretty much any business job you want, including private equity, hedge funds, banking, strategy, etc.
Anonymous User wrote:this is completely fucking wrong RE hedge funds, private equity, banking. the window for jumping into HF/PE from MBB is pre-MBA - you do two years and then you jump to the same sort of PE role that investment banking analysts do (and that's an uphill battle too). if you're a JD, you're entering as a post-MBA consultant along with like 30 other people from you business school. the people they're hiring at OP's level at PE/HF are people from HBS/GSB who already worked in HF/PE before b-school, and even those guys don't always get buy-side jobs after graduation. it's insanely competitive, to the extent that PE associates at KKR and shit are forgoing b-school because they're worried that they won't be able to get back into the industry once they leave. maybe MBB could get an operations (non-investing) role at a fund, working with portfolio co's, but that's very different, compensation and role-wise, than an investing one - you're basically an in-house consultant. and I don't see why it'd be any easier, or more attractive, to do that rather than work as a JD and move over from private funds to work for a GC. unless you like business. in which case, why leave MBB.$$$$$$ wrote: 2 years as an associate at MBB can get you pretty much any business job you want, including private equity, hedge funds, banking, strategy, etc.
as for banking, 1) you can already do that with a JD out of law school, they hire JDs for summer associate programs; 2) you can definitely get a VP banking gig more easily as a lawyer than an MBB if you work in corporate because you're like, doing the same transactions as them, and have skills they value. not saying it's "easy" to do it, but you're definitely better-positioned as a transactions lawyer.
MBB, post-MBA, can get you jobs at Fortune 500s in biz-dev or strategy. which is fine! it's not a path to making millions on Wall Street.
Source: I was a BB investment banker for 3 years and my girlfriend works in PE
PS: people are treating this MBB thing like it's obviously a better job than a V10 and I have no idea why. if you're into "business" sure, but if you're indifferent between law/making powerpoints, the legal job pays better now, pays more 10 years from now, and doesn't require travel.
It's not unheard of to get PE/HF out of the *pre-MBA* role, sure. there are some funds that even prefer it. *pre-MBA* MBB is one of the most coveted jobs in America. it's like being an IB analyst at Goldman Sachs.$$$$$$ wrote:Anonymous User wrote:this is completely fucking wrong RE hedge funds, private equity, banking. the window for jumping into HF/PE from MBB is pre-MBA - you do two years and then you jump to the same sort of PE role that investment banking analysts do (and that's an uphill battle too). if you're a JD, you're entering as a post-MBA consultant along with like 30 other people from you business school. the people they're hiring at OP's level at PE/HF are people from HBS/GSB who already worked in HF/PE before b-school, and even those guys don't always get buy-side jobs after graduation. it's insanely competitive, to the extent that PE associates at KKR and shit are forgoing b-school because they're worried that they won't be able to get back into the industry once they leave. maybe MBB could get an operations (non-investing) role at a fund, working with portfolio co's, but that's very different, compensation and role-wise, than an investing one - you're basically an in-house consultant. and I don't see why it'd be any easier, or more attractive, to do that rather than work as a JD and move over from private funds to work for a GC. unless you like business. in which case, why leave MBB.$$$$$$ wrote: 2 years as an associate at MBB can get you pretty much any business job you want, including private equity, hedge funds, banking, strategy, etc.
as for banking, 1) you can already do that with a JD out of law school, they hire JDs for summer associate programs; 2) you can definitely get a VP banking gig more easily as a lawyer than an MBB if you work in corporate because you're like, doing the same transactions as them, and have skills they value. not saying it's "easy" to do it, but you're definitely better-positioned as a transactions lawyer.
MBB, post-MBA, can get you jobs at Fortune 500s in biz-dev or strategy. which is fine! it's not a path to making millions on Wall Street.
Source: I was a BB investment banker for 3 years and my girlfriend works in PE
PS: people are treating this MBB thing like it's obviously a better job than a V10 and I have no idea why. if you're into "business" sure, but if you're indifferent between law/making powerpoints, the legal job pays better now, pays more 10 years from now, and doesn't require travel.
So intense - definitely not wrong, since those outcomes happened to friends of mine that worked at those firms. Are they outcomes that associates coming out of law school can get? Who knows, but McKinsey helped buddies get into private equity and two of them went to hedge funds. Also, the few kids I know from law school that went to McKinsey had far better experiences than every single biglaw associate i've ever met.
Also, MBB IS an obviously better job than a V10, unless you really want to be a lawyer. I worked at a V10 for a few years out of law school. Never met a group of such motivated, hard-working, intelligent people that absolutely regretted their life decisions. Anyone with any sense and an inkling for a business side career should definitely NOT pass up MBB for a law firm.