I doubt most firms in the V51-100 range will match anytime soon.Anonymous User wrote:What V100 firms haven't matched yet?
NYC to 200k Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Vault is not the right ranking. It lines up much more closely to profits per partner.Anonymous User wrote:I doubt most firms in the V51-100 range will match anytime soon.Anonymous User wrote:What V100 firms haven't matched yet?
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
UPDATE: The gap between BSF and the next most shameful firm (WilmerFail) is now over $1 million in PPP. BSF's PPP is almost double that of firms that have matched. BSFailAnonymous User wrote:Dear Boies Schiller,
You are now the highest PPP firm not to have matched. Given the K&S rumors, the next firm by PPP, Cadwalader (wtf that is), has a PPP $700k less than you. There is a mid-law firm's worth of PPP between you and the next guy. You sell yourself as above market. So respectfully, FUCKING MATCH ALREADY.
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
So plebAnonymous User wrote:UPDATE: The gap between BSF and the next most shameful firm (WilmerFail) is now over $1 million in PPP. BSF's PPP is almost double that of firms that have matched. BSFailAnonymous User wrote:Dear Boies Schiller,
You are now the highest PPP firm not to have matched. Given the K&S rumors, the next firm by PPP, Cadwalader (wtf that is), has a PPP $700k less than you. There is a mid-law firm's worth of PPP between you and the next guy. You sell yourself as above market. So respectfully, FUCKING MATCH ALREADY.
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
There was a lot of discontent about the compensation formula results at the end of 2017. Partners said a few months ago that they were reviewing the formula. So my hope is that the past FOUR WEEKS of silence is due to a total recalculation of the formula as well as a match to market.Anonymous User wrote:So plebAnonymous User wrote:UPDATE: The gap between BSF and the next most shameful firm (WilmerFail) is now over $1 million in PPP. BSF's PPP is almost double that of firms that have matched. BSFailAnonymous User wrote:Dear Boies Schiller,
You are now the highest PPP firm not to have matched. Given the K&S rumors, the next firm by PPP, Cadwalader (wtf that is), has a PPP $700k less than you. There is a mid-law firm's worth of PPP between you and the next guy. You sell yourself as above market. So respectfully, FUCKING MATCH ALREADY.
That's my desperate rationalization and shred of hope anyway.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Sounds like you work there. No word whatsoever from partners? Are they at least aware all their peer firms have moved significantly ahead of them in salary? What about the summer associates? As of this coming Monday they will be underpaid relative to their friends at all other firmsAnonymous User wrote:There was a lot of discontent about the compensation formula results at the end of 2017. Partners said a few months ago that they were reviewing the formula. So my hope is that the past FOUR WEEKS of silence is due to a total recalculation of the formula as well as a match to market.Anonymous User wrote:So plebAnonymous User wrote:UPDATE: The gap between BSF and the next most shameful firm (WilmerFail) is now over $1 million in PPP. BSF's PPP is almost double that of firms that have matched. BSFailAnonymous User wrote:Dear Boies Schiller,
You are now the highest PPP firm not to have matched. Given the K&S rumors, the next firm by PPP, Cadwalader (wtf that is), has a PPP $700k less than you. There is a mid-law firm's worth of PPP between you and the next guy. You sell yourself as above market. So respectfully, FUCKING MATCH ALREADY.
That's my desperate rationalization and shred of hope anyway.
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I'm not a Boies associate, but from WH, and can confirm that no official word whatsoever, and whatever unofficial word has been distinctly unhelpful and not promising. I'm sure they are aware of the shift in the market, but at the moment they show little above disinterest.Anonymous User wrote:Sounds like you work there. No word whatsoever from partners? Are they at least aware all their peer firms have moved significantly ahead of them in salary? What about the summer associates? As of this coming Monday they will be underpaid relative to their friends at all other firms
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
What if my firm thought they announced but someone didn't press send on the email...
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I was going to be starting as an associate in the fall. I guess I should start looking elsewhere before thenAnonymous User wrote:I'm not a Boies associate, but from WH, and can confirm that no official word whatsoever, and whatever unofficial word has been distinctly unhelpful and not promising. I'm sure they are aware of the shift in the market, but at the moment they show little above disinterest.Anonymous User wrote:Sounds like you work there. No word whatsoever from partners? Are they at least aware all their peer firms have moved significantly ahead of them in salary? What about the summer associates? As of this coming Monday they will be underpaid relative to their friends at all other firms
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
What is the “unofficial word” there?Anonymous User wrote:I'm not a Boies associate, but from WH, and can confirm that no official word whatsoever, and whatever unofficial word has been distinctly unhelpful and not promising. I'm sure they are aware of the shift in the market, but at the moment they show little above disinterest.Anonymous User wrote:Sounds like you work there. No word whatsoever from partners? Are they at least aware all their peer firms have moved significantly ahead of them in salary? What about the summer associates? As of this coming Monday they will be underpaid relative to their friends at all other firms
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
That raises and bonuses aren’t coming and the firm will do some hand waving about how they’ll make it up to us later.Anonymous User wrote:What is the “unofficial word” there?Anonymous User wrote:I'm not a Boies associate, but from WH, and can confirm that no official word whatsoever, and whatever unofficial word has been distinctly unhelpful and not promising. I'm sure they are aware of the shift in the market, but at the moment they show little above disinterest.Anonymous User wrote:Sounds like you work there. No word whatsoever from partners? Are they at least aware all their peer firms have moved significantly ahead of them in salary? What about the summer associates? As of this coming Monday they will be underpaid relative to their friends at all other firms
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
That would be pretty surprising. As someone at a smaller Boston firm, WH failing to match Ropes and Goodwin seems hard to believe. I always think of them as being on the same level.Anonymous User wrote:That raises and bonuses aren’t coming and the firm will do some hand waving about how they’ll make it up to us later.Anonymous User wrote:What is the “unofficial word” there?Anonymous User wrote:I'm not a Boies associate, but from WH, and can confirm that no official word whatsoever, and whatever unofficial word has been distinctly unhelpful and not promising. I'm sure they are aware of the shift in the market, but at the moment they show little above disinterest.Anonymous User wrote:Sounds like you work there. No word whatsoever from partners? Are they at least aware all their peer firms have moved significantly ahead of them in salary? What about the summer associates? As of this coming Monday they will be underpaid relative to their friends at all other firms
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Anon you quoted. Sorry, was reading through the thread too fast. Was talking about Boies.Anonymous User wrote:That would be pretty surprising. As someone at a smaller Boston firm, WH failing to match Ropes and Goodwin seems hard to believe. I always think of them as being on the same level.Anonymous User wrote:That raises and bonuses aren’t coming and the firm will do some hand waving about how they’ll make it up to us later.Anonymous User wrote:What is the “unofficial word” there?Anonymous User wrote:I'm not a Boies associate, but from WH, and can confirm that no official word whatsoever, and whatever unofficial word has been distinctly unhelpful and not promising. I'm sure they are aware of the shift in the market, but at the moment they show little above disinterest.Anonymous User wrote:Sounds like you work there. No word whatsoever from partners? Are they at least aware all their peer firms have moved significantly ahead of them in salary? What about the summer associates? As of this coming Monday they will be underpaid relative to their friends at all other firms
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
WH currently #23 on Vault for compensation...
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I am currently pending for a lateral position, about a week out after a third interview, at one of the firms that just matched within the last couple days. Very favorable feedback during and after the interview.
What are the chances that a reluctant match could affect a lateral’s candidacy (ie belt tightening)?
FWIW it’s been a bit over a week and I haven’t heard anything.
Relatedly, what are the chances that this firmwide raise could affect how quickly they get back to me?
What are the chances that a reluctant match could affect a lateral’s candidacy (ie belt tightening)?
FWIW it’s been a bit over a week and I haven’t heard anything.
Relatedly, what are the chances that this firmwide raise could affect how quickly they get back to me?
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
We may want to give BSF a little more time before casting them out. In order to increase compensation, the firm has to upgrade the entire compensation formula for associates - which, I take it, is more involved than assigning what peer firms are doing. Word of mouth is that members of the partner committee that decides these things are actively working on itAnonymous User wrote:Anon you quoted. Sorry, was reading through the thread too fast. Was talking about Boies.Anonymous User wrote:That would be pretty surprising. As someone at a smaller Boston firm, WH failing to match Ropes and Goodwin seems hard to believe. I always think of them as being on the same level.Anonymous User wrote:That raises and bonuses aren’t coming and the firm will do some hand waving about how they’ll make it up to us later.Anonymous User wrote:What is the “unofficial word” there?Anonymous User wrote:I'm not a Boies associate, but from WH, and can confirm that no official word whatsoever, and whatever unofficial word has been distinctly unhelpful and not promising. I'm sure they are aware of the shift in the market, but at the moment they show little above disinterest.Anonymous User wrote:Sounds like you work there. No word whatsoever from partners? Are they at least aware all their peer firms have moved significantly ahead of them in salary? What about the summer associates? As of this coming Monday they will be underpaid relative to their friends at all other firms
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
With King & Spalding raising, the rest of the big AmLaw 100 Atlanta firms have to raise IMO or are doomed to fall behind K&S forever. K&S already has the top reputation in ATL and everyone will surely fall behind them in terms of recruiting if the rest don't also have competitive salaries. I expect Alston, Kilpatrick, Troutman, etc. to follow suit and raise soon...but who knows.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
In 2016, K&S raised on June 17. A&B followed on June 20, Kilpatrick on June 30 and Troutman on July 1.Anonymous User wrote:With King & Spalding raising, the rest of the big AmLaw 100 Atlanta firms have to raise IMO or are doomed to fall behind K&S forever. K&S already has the top reputation in ATL and everyone will surely fall behind them in terms of recruiting if the rest don't also have competitive salaries. I expect Alston, Kilpatrick, Troutman, etc. to follow suit and raise soon...but who knows.
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
i can't believe we are onto discussing with Atlanta firms are going to do, when we're still waiting on WilmerFAIL.
I haven't seen a more pitiful "top 20 player" since Anna Kournikova.
I haven't seen a more pitiful "top 20 player" since Anna Kournikova.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Fri Jun 29, 2018 8:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Fragomen has nearly $2M in PPP? That's news to me.
Anyone know what compensation is like there? I can't imagine it is at or near market.
Anyone know what compensation is like there? I can't imagine it is at or near market.
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
There are fewer biglaw SA positions in all of Atlanta than in Skadden’s New York office. The Atlanta firms could probably cut salaries and fill their classes with kids from Duke, UVA, and Vanderbilt without ever having to touch UGA or Emory. So doubt the salary movement affects ATL recruiting at all.Anonymous User wrote:With King & Spalding raising, the rest of the big AmLaw 100 Atlanta firms have to raise IMO or are doomed to fall behind K&S forever. K&S already has the top reputation in ATL and everyone will surely fall behind them in terms of recruiting if the rest don't also have competitive salaries. I expect Alston, Kilpatrick, Troutman, etc. to follow suit and raise soon...but who knows.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
It’s that leverage. I want to at Fragomen probably has like 7 associates/staff attorneys per partner.Anonymous User wrote:Fragomen has nearly $2M in PPP? That's news to me.
Anyone know what compensation is like there? I can't imagine it is at or near market.
Also, Fragomen is garbage. It had a partnership with my law school that gave like 13 students credit instead of $ to work for it during its busy season. And some summered there and none got offers.
As to your second question, when NY was 160, Fragomen NY was 125 (at least for law clerks) and 100 for staff attorneys.
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Firm management seems completely oblivious to the hit this has had on already less than stellar associate morale.Anonymous User wrote:WH currently #23 on Vault for compensation...
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Meh. As long as they match today (w/ bonus) I would call this a minor annoyance that I'll forget about in 6 months.Anonymous User wrote:Firm management seems completely oblivious to the hit this has had on already less than stellar associate morale.Anonymous User wrote:WH currently #23 on Vault for compensation...
-
- Posts: 431096
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Thanks for your chart NakedPowerOrgan. Am I the only one who has never heard of Fish & Richardson and Fragomen?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login