NYC to 200k Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
How quickly do firms realistically need to match in order to contend at OCI?
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
As a rising 2L, I would say it won't affect my bid list because we expect most places to match. But if all the peer firms have matched and a specific firm hasn't it might matter - and it might matter come offer time.Anonymous User wrote:How quickly do firms realistically need to match in order to contend at OCI?
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
When you consider the savings that firms get in tx with lower overhead, lower taxes, etc., it is pretty ridiculous that tx associates don’t get paid more than somewhere expensive like sf/ny.Anonymous User wrote:TX to $210k. Who's with me? Need to get to that upper-middle class status.
- nealric
- Posts: 4352
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Billing rates are lower in Texas.Anonymous User wrote:When you consider the savings that firms get in tx with lower overhead, lower taxes, etc., it is pretty ridiculous that tx associates don’t get paid more than somewhere expensive like sf/ny.Anonymous User wrote:TX to $210k. Who's with me? Need to get to that upper-middle class status.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Everything's smaller in Texas.nealric wrote:Billing rates are lower in Texas.Anonymous User wrote:When you consider the savings that firms get in tx with lower overhead, lower taxes, etc., it is pretty ridiculous that tx associates don’t get paid more than somewhere expensive like sf/ny.Anonymous User wrote:TX to $210k. Who's with me? Need to get to that upper-middle class status.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
K&E bills out Houston attorneys at same rates as their other offices.nealric wrote:Billing rates are lower in Texas.Anonymous User wrote:When you consider the savings that firms get in tx with lower overhead, lower taxes, etc., it is pretty ridiculous that tx associates don’t get paid more than somewhere expensive like sf/ny.Anonymous User wrote:TX to $210k. Who's with me? Need to get to that upper-middle class status.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
What you surely meant to say is that as a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in your bid list because you have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.Anonymous User wrote:As a rising 2L, I would say it won't affect my bid list because we expect most places to match. But if all the peer firms have matched and a specific firm hasn't it might matter - and it might matter come offer time.Anonymous User wrote:How quickly do firms realistically need to match in order to contend at OCI?
I forgive the mistake.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Anon you responded to.Anonymous User wrote:What you surely meant to say is that as a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in your bid list because you have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.Anonymous User wrote:As a rising 2L, I would say it won't affect my bid list because we expect most places to match. But if all the peer firms have matched and a specific firm hasn't it might matter - and it might matter come offer time.Anonymous User wrote:How quickly do firms realistically need to match in order to contend at OCI?
I forgive the mistake.
Yeah, no.
- LaLiLuLeLo
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:54 am
Re: NYC to 200k
No offer.Anonymous User wrote:Anon you responded to.Anonymous User wrote:What you surely meant to say is that as a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in your bid list because you have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.Anonymous User wrote:As a rising 2L, I would say it won't affect my bid list because we expect most places to match. But if all the peer firms have matched and a specific firm hasn't it might matter - and it might matter come offer time.Anonymous User wrote:How quickly do firms realistically need to match in order to contend at OCI?
I forgive the mistake.
Yeah, no.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
...other than the bank accounts. You know, if I were to buy another house and another car or two, I'd probably be down to middle class.Anonymous User wrote:Everything's smaller in Texas.nealric wrote:Billing rates are lower in Texas.Anonymous User wrote:When you consider the savings that firms get in tx with lower overhead, lower taxes, etc., it is pretty ridiculous that tx associates don’t get paid more than somewhere expensive like sf/ny.Anonymous User wrote:TX to $210k. Who's with me? Need to get to that upper-middle class status.
- EzraFitz
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 10:42 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Look up, you'll see the joke flying over your head.Anonymous User wrote:Anon you responded to.Anonymous User wrote:What you surely meant to say is that as a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in your bid list because you have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.Anonymous User wrote:As a rising 2L, I would say it won't affect my bid list because we expect most places to match. But if all the peer firms have matched and a specific firm hasn't it might matter - and it might matter come offer time.Anonymous User wrote:How quickly do firms realistically need to match in order to contend at OCI?
I forgive the mistake.
Yeah, no.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
As a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in my bid list because I have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
You're not even in biglaw. I'm sure you'll screw up OCI and won't be able to fuck with my raise then in the future.Anonymous User wrote:Anon you responded to.Anonymous User wrote:What you surely meant to say is that as a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in your bid list because you have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.Anonymous User wrote:As a rising 2L, I would say it won't affect my bid list because we expect most places to match. But if all the peer firms have matched and a specific firm hasn't it might matter - and it might matter come offer time.Anonymous User wrote:How quickly do firms realistically need to match in order to contend at OCI?
I forgive the mistake.
Yeah, no.
Go back to law school.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- nealric
- Posts: 4352
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I don't care with K&E does. When I'm hiring outside counsel, the Texas option is almost always cheaper on an hourly basis than someone in NYC or DC.Anonymous User wrote:K&E bills out Houston attorneys at same rates as their other offices.nealric wrote:Billing rates are lower in Texas.Anonymous User wrote:When you consider the savings that firms get in tx with lower overhead, lower taxes, etc., it is pretty ridiculous that tx associates don’t get paid more than somewhere expensive like sf/ny.Anonymous User wrote:TX to $210k. Who's with me? Need to get to that upper-middle class status.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Different anon.Anonymous User wrote:As a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in my bid list because I have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.
As a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in my bid list because I have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
DPW seems like a great fit for youAnonymous User wrote:Anon you responded to.Anonymous User wrote: What you surely meant to say is that as a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in your bid list because you have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.
I forgive the mistake.
Yeah, no.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Okay - so to round up, a week after first raises occurred and a full day after CravaTTTh raised, a survey of our most profitable law firms by publicly available metrics:
Wachtell - heard nothing, wouldn't expect to.
Quinn - nothing
Kirkland - nothing
S&C - nothing
Gibson - nothing
Cahill - nothing
Milbank - first mover
Skadden - nothing
STB - Second mover, instituted special bonuses
Willkie - nothing
CravaTTTh - Third mover, lame attempt to one up more profitable, higher pre$tige Milbank
Paul Weiss - nothing
Fried Frank - nothing
Latham - nothing
Wilmer - nothing
Davis Polk - nothing
Boies - nothing
Debevoise - Matched CravaTTTh
Weil - nothing
Tomorrow someone goes to 200k. Book it.
Wachtell - heard nothing, wouldn't expect to.
Quinn - nothing
Kirkland - nothing
S&C - nothing
Gibson - nothing
Cahill - nothing
Milbank - first mover
Skadden - nothing
STB - Second mover, instituted special bonuses
Willkie - nothing
CravaTTTh - Third mover, lame attempt to one up more profitable, higher pre$tige Milbank
Paul Weiss - nothing
Fried Frank - nothing
Latham - nothing
Wilmer - nothing
Davis Polk - nothing
Boies - nothing
Debevoise - Matched CravaTTTh
Weil - nothing
Tomorrow someone goes to 200k. Book it.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Jun 12, 2018 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
100% this is all the same personAnonymous User wrote:Different anon.Anonymous User wrote:As a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in my bid list because I have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.
As a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in my bid list because I have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Different anon.Anonymous User wrote:Different anon.Anonymous User wrote:As a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in my bid list because I have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.
As a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in my bid list because I have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.
Firms that match indicate their potential to keep growing in the future, and the somewhat mid-future is what I care about most since it'll be 2-3 years (depending on whether I clerk) until I actually get paid. If they're hesitant about matching now, who knows how willing they'll match in the future.
Pls hurry.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Different anon.Anonymous User wrote:Different anon.Anonymous User wrote:As a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in my bid list because I have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.
As a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in my bid list because I have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.
As a rising 2L, I'm gravely concerned about the health of firms that have to think twice about a quick match. I simply will not bid for them.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Different anon from the different anons. Concur with all the different anons.Anonymous User wrote:Different anon.Anonymous User wrote:Different anon.Anonymous User wrote:As a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in my bid list because I have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.
As a rising 2L, firms that are slow to match/beat Cravath's new base salary scale + bonuses will be greatly affected in my bid list because I have no way of knowing which of those firms will match/beat them after the fact.
As a rising 2L, I'm gravely concerned about the health of firms that have to think twice about a quick match. I simply will not bid for them.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
K&E’s Houston office has become one of the largest in Houston (right around top five in terms of number of attorneys), so as somebody who hires Texas biglaw counsel, maybe you should care and be a little more in tune with things.nealric wrote:I don't care with K&E does. When I'm hiring outside counsel, the Texas option is almost always cheaper on an hourly basis than someone in NYC or DC.Anonymous User wrote:K&E bills out Houston attorneys at same rates as their other offices.nealric wrote:Billing rates are lower in Texas.Anonymous User wrote:When you consider the savings that firms get in tx with lower overhead, lower taxes, etc., it is pretty ridiculous that tx associates don’t get paid more than somewhere expensive like sf/ny.Anonymous User wrote:TX to $210k. Who's with me? Need to get to that upper-middle class status.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Paul Hastings > Debevoise in terms of PPP. If they match, can probably expect all the big California firms to fall in line quickly.Anonymous User wrote:Okay - so to round up, a week after first raises occurred and a full day after CravaTTTh raised, a survey of our most profitable law firms by publicly available metrics:
Wachtell - heard nothing, wouldn't expect to.
Quinn - nothing
Kirkland - nothing
S&C - nothing
Gibson - nothing
Cahill - nothing
Milbank - first mover
Skadden - nothing
STB - Second mover, instituted special bonuses
Willkie - nothing
CravaTTTh - Third mover, lame attempt to one up more profitable, higher pre$tige Milbank
Paul Weiss - nothing
Fried Frank - nothing
Latham - nothing
Wilmer - nothing
Davis Polk - nothing
Boies - nothing
Debevoise - Matched CravaTTTh
Weil - nothing
Tomorrow someone goes to 200k. Book it.
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:15 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Will eat a shoe if this doesn't happen.Anonymous User wrote:Okay - so to round up, a week after first raises occurred and a full day after CravaTTTh raised, a survey of our most profitable law firms by publicly available metrics:
Wachtell - heard nothing, wouldn't expect to.
Quinn - nothing
Kirkland - nothing
S&C - nothing
Gibson - nothing
Cahill - nothing
Milbank - first mover
Skadden - nothing
STB - Second mover, instituted special bonuses
Willkie - nothing
CravaTTTh - Third mover, lame attempt to one up more profitable, higher pre$tige Milbank
Paul Weiss - nothing
Fried Frank - nothing
Latham - nothing
Wilmer - nothing
Davis Polk - nothing
Boies - nothing
Debevoise - Matched CravaTTTh
Weil - nothing
Tomorrow someone goes to 200k. Book it.
-
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
LMAO at the poster trying to attribute living in NYC as extra income in determining socioeconomic class.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login