Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=286522
Don't worry about it, I think you've just outed yourself as someone who won't be at any V100 firm for very long. Most of these firms are pretty professional workplaces these days and won't really tolerate a junior associate dumb enough to rate the attractiveness of their female colleagues.Anonymous User wrote:I know I'm going to get trashed on this but hahaha if any of the ladies have any problem with this you can ask the same question but with guys. Lol no I wouldn't factor this when choosing a firm. At least not a major factor
You'd be surprised ...Anonymous User wrote:Don't worry about it, I think you've just outed yourself as someone who won't be at any V100 firm for very long. Most of these firms are pretty professional workplaces these days and won't really tolerate a junior associate dumb enough to rate the attractiveness of their female colleagues.Anonymous User wrote:I know I'm going to get trashed on this but hahaha if any of the ladies have any problem with this you can ask the same question but with guys. Lol no I wouldn't factor this when choosing a firm. At least not a major factor
I don't think OP is a rainmaking partner unless I missed something...sounds like a bro who, if there is any justice in this world, will end up working for women partners who find him as unattractive as he is immature.xn3345 wrote:Wilson sonsini partners knew a partner was having tourniquets delivered to the office (related to a heroin addiction). They did nothing. That partner later died of an overdose. That’s one of the most coveted firms in Northern California. If a partner billing a lot can shoot heroin there, I’m fairly certain no one would blink at them rating women in private, especially at firms more desperate for clients and rainmaking partners.
LolAnonymous User wrote:Don't worry about it, I think you've just outed yourself as someone who won't be at any V100 firm for very long. Most of these firms are pretty professional workplaces these days and won't really tolerate a junior associate dumb enough to rate the attractiveness of their female colleagues.Anonymous User wrote:I know I'm going to get trashed on this but hahaha if any of the ladies have any problem with this you can ask the same question but with guys. Lol no I wouldn't factor this when choosing a firm. At least not a major factor
Your law firm does not/will not see you as a human being. Why don't you grow a sense of humor?Anonymous User wrote:Nothing's better in this day and age to rank the attractiveness of potential co-workers instead of seeing them as human beings
Lol shut the fuck up. OP is just curious. Hopefully he wouldn't be as dumb as to rate coworkers on looks with other coworkers. 90% of men have a "Would I smash" thought process when they work with any girl within a week. They just don't expressed this like OP.Anonymous User wrote:Don't worry about it, I think you've just outed yourself as someone who won't be at any V100 firm for very long. Most of these firms are pretty professional workplaces these days and won't really tolerate a junior associate dumb enough to rate the attractiveness of their female colleagues.Anonymous User wrote:I know I'm going to get trashed on this but hahaha if any of the ladies have any problem with this you can ask the same question but with guys. Lol no I wouldn't factor this when choosing a firm. At least not a major factor
Anonymous User wrote:Lol shut the fuck up. OP is just curious. Hopefully he wouldn't be as dumb as to rate coworkers on looks with other coworkers. 90% of men have a "Would I smash" thought process when they work with any girl within a week. They just don't expressed this like OP.Anonymous User wrote:Don't worry about it, I think you've just outed yourself as someone who won't be at any V100 firm for very long. Most of these firms are pretty professional workplaces these days and won't really tolerate a junior associate dumb enough to rate the attractiveness of their female colleagues.Anonymous User wrote:I know I'm going to get trashed on this but hahaha if any of the ladies have any problem with this you can ask the same question but with guys. Lol no I wouldn't factor this when choosing a firm. At least not a major factor
Anonymous User wrote:Maybe OP is single and wants to find someone while working? Is that okay? Just curious actually. I mean he couldn’t date a partner, but an associate in another practice group over whom he has no influence on professional development.Anonymous User wrote:Lol shut the fuck up. OP is just curious. Hopefully he wouldn't be as dumb as to rate coworkers on looks with other coworkers. 90% of men have a "Would I smash" thought process when they work with any girl within a week. They just don't expressed this like OP.Anonymous User wrote:Don't worry about it, I think you've just outed yourself as someone who won't be at any V100 firm for very long. Most of these firms are pretty professional workplaces these days and won't really tolerate a junior associate dumb enough to rate the attractiveness of their female colleagues.Anonymous User wrote:I know I'm going to get trashed on this but hahaha if any of the ladies have any problem with this you can ask the same question but with guys. Lol no I wouldn't factor this when choosing a firm. At least not a major factor
Nobody is saying considering the attractiveness of your coworkers is a thought crime, but like you said 90% of people are smart enough not to express that except maybe in very private settings. These firms are traditionally male-dominated and women are trying to build careers based on their merit and facing real obstacles. There is a serious lack of perspective and maturity in rating the looks of your female colleagues.
You have a strange obsession with that firmWild Card wrote:Your law firm does not/will not see you as a human being. Why don't you grow a sense of humor?Anonymous User wrote:Nothing's better in this day and age to rank the attractiveness of potential co-workers instead of seeing them as human beings
--
WLRK, because they make a fuckload of money and must've had astronomically high grades from T6 law schools.
I'm not so subtly insinuating that female (and male) associates are hideous, inside and out. The attractive women at my law school are all doing public interest, so there.jbagelboy wrote:You have a strange obsession with that firmWild Card wrote:Your law firm does not/will not see you as a human being. Why don't you grow a sense of humor?Anonymous User wrote:Nothing's better in this day and age to rank the attractiveness of potential co-workers instead of seeing them as human beings
--
WLRK, because they make a fuckload of money and must've had astronomically high grades from T6 law schools.
It certainly does not fit the bill to this question, and nothing about how you described it would sugggest otherwise
Man, sure would be weird if large corporate entities only took steps that respected their employees when it protected them from liability, wouldn’t itxn3345 wrote:Wilson sonsini partners knew a partner was having tourniquets delivered to the office (related to a heroin addiction). They did nothing. That partner later died of an overdose. That’s one of the most coveted firms in Northern California. If a partner billing a lot can shoot heroin there, I’m fairly certain no one would blink at them rating women in private, especially at firms more desperate for clients and rainmaking partners.
Link ?xn3345 wrote:Wilson sonsini partners knew a partner was having tourniquets delivered to the office (related to a heroin addiction). They did nothing. That partner later died of an overdose. That’s one of the most coveted firms in Northern California. If a partner billing a lot can shoot heroin there, I’m fairly certain no one would blink at them rating women in private, especially at firms more desperate for clients and rainmaking partners.
So actually though, can I ask the same question but for guys?? I am in the process of going through lateral interviews, but I will have to say, as a very sexually active gay guy, I will miss seeing the group stud partner leaning against my doorway with his sleeves rolled up....Anonymous User wrote:I know I'm going to get trashed on this but hahaha if any of the ladies have any problem with this you can ask the same question but with guys. Lol no I wouldn't factor this when choosing a firm. At least not a major factor
lighten upAnonymous User wrote:Don't worry about it, I think you've just outed yourself as someone who won't be at any V100 firm for very long. Most of these firms are pretty professional workplaces these days and won't really tolerate a junior associate dumb enough to rate the attractiveness of their female colleagues.Anonymous User wrote:I know I'm going to get trashed on this but hahaha if any of the ladies have any problem with this you can ask the same question but with guys. Lol no I wouldn't factor this when choosing a firm. At least not a major factor
Yeah holy shit I just looked and can confirm.Anonymous User wrote:White & Case LA has some talent on BOTH SIDES.