In House v. V50
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2017 2:28 pm
Bit of background - working at large, global company for 10 years, continuing to work through law school. Want to be a litigator and like environmental lit. Have an offer from a V50 in a NE market that I really like and does exactly what I want to do (would be in the lit group and they do a lot of enviro litigation). However, was also given an offer to stay in-house post graduation as the environmental/litigation counsel. V50 will offer better pay ($180, but with high COL) and (I think) better long term opportunities (hard to go to a law firm if you start in-house, or so I am told) and while the hours will def be worse, the billables are 1800 which isn't terrible. The in-house position will be with people I know, I will be expected to move to the Midwest post-graduation (not necessarily a problem, but would prefer east coast where the V50 is) with a possibility of working abroad (Europe) for a short stint within the first couple of years, and while the hours will be better (generally everyone is gone by 6PM but there is some night work from home, almost no weekend work) the pay will be less (still working it out but likely starting ~$120-130, but may be evened out by COL) and I am not a huge fan of our corporate management.
I am leaning toward the V50 just because I think my long-term opps will be better. I want to be a litigator and while the company does tend to get hands-on in its lit (editing briefs, showing up at court), it tends to be more of a litigation management role and I think I will have better learning opps at the firm. (And with my connections in the industry I am positive I would be able to find in-house employment at a similar company after a couple years at the firm if I wanted to). I understand I would be "starting at the bottom" in a sense, but also know exactly what I am getting into. On the other hand, in-house would allow me to work in other areas I enjoy (corporate compliance, international trade, industrial security, etc...), which I may never see as a litigator at a V50.
Also - TTT, top 10%, secondary journal, moot court, if that means anything as far as the math here goes.
Any thoughts/comments would be appreciated. I get a lot of feedback from the attorneys I work with but would appreciate any from the larger community, especially with regards to the ability to go to a law firm after starting in-house.
Thanks!
I am leaning toward the V50 just because I think my long-term opps will be better. I want to be a litigator and while the company does tend to get hands-on in its lit (editing briefs, showing up at court), it tends to be more of a litigation management role and I think I will have better learning opps at the firm. (And with my connections in the industry I am positive I would be able to find in-house employment at a similar company after a couple years at the firm if I wanted to). I understand I would be "starting at the bottom" in a sense, but also know exactly what I am getting into. On the other hand, in-house would allow me to work in other areas I enjoy (corporate compliance, international trade, industrial security, etc...), which I may never see as a litigator at a V50.
Also - TTT, top 10%, secondary journal, moot court, if that means anything as far as the math here goes.
Any thoughts/comments would be appreciated. I get a lot of feedback from the attorneys I work with but would appreciate any from the larger community, especially with regards to the ability to go to a law firm after starting in-house.
Thanks!