Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=280170
OP here. I was thinking of waiting until after they give me an offer to raise my concerns. Do you think they will revoke their offer after they hear my concerns? Or they'll just say something like, "We will not make any changes. You can walk"? Don't they have some incentive to try to address my concerns, given that it will look bad for them if one summer out of a relatively small summer class (single-digit) decides not to come back?PeanutsNJam wrote:If you feel confident in your ability to get an offer somewhere else (or already have an offer somewhere else), I don't see the harm in being candid.
But if it's working in a practice group "in shambles" vs not working at all, I'd say pick the former and look to lateral asap.
Also, pointless summer assignments is pretty par for the course in biglaw.
Doesn't NALP publish stats, along with offer rates? Just like schools are obsessed with yield, aren't firms?jd20132013 wrote:How will it look bad, exactly ?
Yes, but for NALP purposes all that matters is that they've made you an offer - not whether or not you've accepted the offer and actually return in the fall. This is where the whole concept of the "cold offer" comes inAnonymous User wrote:Doesn't NALP publish stats, along with offer rates? Just like schools are obsessed with yield, aren't firms?jd20132013 wrote:How will it look bad, exactly ?
Pokemon wrote:Do not be honest at all but do 3l oci.
What are the negative consequences of being honest? Will the firm revoke the offer?trebekismyhero wrote:Pokemon wrote:Do not be honest at all but do 3l oci.
No, but someone will remember your attitude if you do go back and its possible it will impact your opportunities at that firm. Its also possible everyone will forget, but its a risk most summers wouldn't take.Anonymous User wrote:What are the negative consequences of being honest? Will the firm revoke the offer?trebekismyhero wrote:Pokemon wrote:Do not be honest at all but do 3l oci.
What "attitude"?jbagelboy wrote:No, but someone will remember your attitude if you do go back and its possible it will impact your opportunities at that firm. Its also possible everyone will forget, but its a risk most summers wouldn't take.Anonymous User wrote:What are the negative consequences of being honest? Will the firm revoke the offer?trebekismyhero wrote:Pokemon wrote:Do not be honest at all but do 3l oci.
I think it's totally fair to ask whether you could get into your desired group if you accepted, but how far you go critically beyond that is less certain
The attitude where you think you're above a bullshit assignment as a summer and should get to pick where you work and what you do. I'm not saying you're wrong in wanting to get in that practice group, but more senior attorneys might see your complaints as entitlements, especially considering that you're a summer (get paid well despite not being particularly useful).Anonymous User wrote:What "attitude"?jbagelboy wrote:No, but someone will remember your attitude if you do go back and its possible it will impact your opportunities at that firm. Its also possible everyone will forget, but its a risk most summers wouldn't take.Anonymous User wrote:What are the negative consequences of being honest? Will the firm revoke the offer?trebekismyhero wrote:Pokemon wrote:Do not be honest at all but do 3l oci.
I think it's totally fair to ask whether you could get into your desired group if you accepted, but how far you go critically beyond that is less certain
If you're the OP, the one in the first post.Anonymous User wrote:What "attitude"?jbagelboy wrote:No, but someone will remember your attitude if you do go back and its possible it will impact your opportunities at that firm. Its also possible everyone will forget, but its a risk most summers wouldn't take.Anonymous User wrote:What are the negative consequences of being honest? Will the firm revoke the offer?trebekismyhero wrote:Pokemon wrote:Do not be honest at all but do 3l oci.
I think it's totally fair to ask whether you could get into your desired group if you accepted, but how far you go critically beyond that is less certain
I'm just trying to learn. What specific thing have I said that is "immature," "inconsiderate," or "disrespectful"?SFSpartan wrote:If you decide to be direct in your end of summer review, how it's perceived is largely going to be about delivery. You need to find a way to do this in a way that comes across as mature, considered, and respectful (as opposed to your general tone ITT). Run whatever you want to say by someone else so they can check it for tone. If you can't or don't want to do that, then I'd hesitate to be so direct.
Edit: Also, everything that dixie said is on point
I understand, but as I said, the senior associate on the team completely agrees, has told me so multiple times, and will be in the room during the end-of-summer review. Does that change things?dixiecupdrinking wrote:There are concerns or constructive criticisms that might be appropriate to raise in your review, but these are not.
Your preferred practice group may not have had work for you to do. That happens sometimes. It doesn't necessarily mean you can't do it when you come back as an associate. Nor does it mean they were neglecting you. It's just the way the work flows. If by "raising" this concern you mean simply asking whether the firm will be able to accommodate you in your preferred practice, that's fine, but do not complain about the way your summer went.
Your opinion about a partner's strategic decisions, or whether you "find utility in" the work you've been asked to do, are frankly completely irrelevant and it would concern me if I worked with a summer associate who thought otherwise. You don't know the forest from the trees. You can barely even identify a tree yet.
I would honestly be more worried about your firm thinking you're entitled and a bad fit, rather than using your review to complain about them. From the lavish recruiting, SAs sometimes get the misimpression that they're valuable. You need the firm a lot more than the firm needs you.
As to the consequences? They probably won't revoke your offer, but this will be your last chance to make an impression for at least a year, and people DO remember when summers rub them the wrong way.
not to speak for dixiecup, but my answer would be "no, it doesn't"Anonymous User wrote:I understand, but as I said, the senior associate on the team completely agrees, has told me so multiple times, and will be in the room during the end-of-summer review. Does that change things?dixiecupdrinking wrote:There are concerns or constructive criticisms that might be appropriate to raise in your review, but these are not.
Your preferred practice group may not have had work for you to do. That happens sometimes. It doesn't necessarily mean you can't do it when you come back as an associate. Nor does it mean they were neglecting you. It's just the way the work flows. If by "raising" this concern you mean simply asking whether the firm will be able to accommodate you in your preferred practice, that's fine, but do not complain about the way your summer went.
Your opinion about a partner's strategic decisions, or whether you "find utility in" the work you've been asked to do, are frankly completely irrelevant and it would concern me if I worked with a summer associate who thought otherwise. You don't know the forest from the trees. You can barely even identify a tree yet.
I would honestly be more worried about your firm thinking you're entitled and a bad fit, rather than using your review to complain about them. From the lavish recruiting, SAs sometimes get the misimpression that they're valuable. You need the firm a lot more than the firm needs you.
As to the consequences? They probably won't revoke your offer, but this will be your last chance to make an impression for at least a year, and people DO remember when summers rub them the wrong way.
Anonymous User wrote:I understand, but as I said, the senior associate on the team completely agrees, has told me so multiple times, and will be in the room during the end-of-summer review. Does that change things?dixiecupdrinking wrote:There are concerns or constructive criticisms that might be appropriate to raise in your review, but these are not.
Your preferred practice group may not have had work for you to do. That happens sometimes. It doesn't necessarily mean you can't do it when you come back as an associate. Nor does it mean they were neglecting you. It's just the way the work flows. If by "raising" this concern you mean simply asking whether the firm will be able to accommodate you in your preferred practice, that's fine, but do not complain about the way your summer went.
Your opinion about a partner's strategic decisions, or whether you "find utility in" the work you've been asked to do, are frankly completely irrelevant and it would concern me if I worked with a summer associate who thought otherwise. You don't know the forest from the trees. You can barely even identify a tree yet.
I would honestly be more worried about your firm thinking you're entitled and a bad fit, rather than using your review to complain about them. From the lavish recruiting, SAs sometimes get the misimpression that they're valuable. You need the firm a lot more than the firm needs you.
As to the consequences? They probably won't revoke your offer, but this will be your last chance to make an impression for at least a year, and people DO remember when summers rub them the wrong way.
Are you thinking that the senior associate will speak up against the partner's decision during your end of summer review? Unless I'm missing something, it's a lot more likely that the senior associate has already raised the issue (tactfully and in a better forum) and got shot down or has decided that this isn't a hill to die on.runinthefront wrote:not to speak for dixiecup, but my answer would be "no, it doesn't"Anonymous User wrote:I understand, but as I said, the senior associate on the team completely agrees, has told me so multiple times, and will be in the room during the end-of-summer review. Does that change things?dixiecupdrinking wrote:. . .