ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
User avatar
Mr. Fancy

Silver
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:22 pm

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by Mr. Fancy » Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:51 am

SmokeytheBear wrote:I'll say what we're all thinking.

Kirkland.

Kirkland even agrees.


Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:36 am

Baker McKenzie in the tax controversy context.

User avatar
elendinel

Silver
Posts: 975
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:29 pm

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by elendinel » Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:04 am

clshopeful wrote:
hiima3L wrote:
Nebby wrote:
A. Nony Mouse wrote:If you really want to do this, you go first, Nebby.
Department of Justice
Yes, all 10,000,000 DOJ lawyers are bad.
This is what I was referring to. Last thing we need on TLS is even more generalizations. How can this thread even be taken seriously. You work on a case with opposing counsel at firm X. The 3 people you work with are all rude and are disrespectful. Therefore, the entire 12 office, 1200 lawyer firm is rude and disrespectful.
Y so srs

User avatar
landshoes

Silver
Posts: 1291
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:17 pm

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by landshoes » Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:10 am

More stories plz

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


TheSpecialist

New
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:20 am

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by TheSpecialist » Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:49 am

I had a terrible experience with someone in my specialty area at clifford chance. Pretty large M&A deal and he wouldn't accept a single change to any terms, down to a comma. We try scaling back our comments and he comes back with the same exact language. Guy is a complete ass when we try talking on the phone and won't budge an inch. In the meantime, client doesn't really care and just wants to get the deal done. We make no progress and the night before signing, we need to join an all hands on deck call (including both clients) to resolve. We explain what we've been saying for the past month, that we need X, Y, and Z at the bare minimum, and even that isn't market, etc. Clifford guy's response: "That sounds reasonable to me."

Thanks, Clifford guy. Could maybe have saved us some time if you said that about a month ago.

JusticeJackson

Silver
Posts: 609
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:26 am

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by JusticeJackson » Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:31 pm

.
Last edited by JusticeJackson on Sat Dec 16, 2017 10:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

kykiske

Bronze
Posts: 299
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 7:12 pm

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by kykiske » Fri Jun 23, 2017 1:07 pm

I've had a pleasant experience with bigger firms. Most of the attorneys jut want to get to the merits and not fight over dumb stuff (i.e., discovery deadlines).

The worst experience I've had has not even been with solos, but with various smaller boutique law firms. The attorneys I've encountered all have this strange "god" complex, as in they're objectively right, regardless of what the facts and law may say.

User avatar
Slytherpuff

Platinum
Posts: 5401
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:50 pm

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by Slytherpuff » Fri Jun 23, 2017 1:13 pm

sms18 wrote:Weil Gotshal
Seconding this

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


JusticeJackson

Silver
Posts: 609
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:26 am

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by JusticeJackson » Fri Jun 23, 2017 1:41 pm

.
Last edited by JusticeJackson on Sat Dec 16, 2017 10:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
landshoes

Silver
Posts: 1291
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:17 pm

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by landshoes » Fri Jun 23, 2017 5:31 pm

Slytherpuff wrote:
sms18 wrote:Weil Gotshal
Seconding this
Stories? Details?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jun 23, 2017 5:40 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Munger. by a mile.
That's interesting.

I'm working across Susman on a big matter and they are way sloppier/less competent than I expected.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jun 24, 2017 1:17 am

TheSpecialist wrote:I had a terrible experience with someone in my specialty area at Clifford Chance. Pretty large M&A deal and he wouldn't accept a single change to any terms, down to a comma. We try scaling back our comments and he comes back with the same exact language. Guy is a complete ass when we try talking on the phone and won't budge an inch. In the meantime, client doesn't really care and just wants to get the deal done. We make no progress and the night before signing, we need to join an all hands on deck call (including both clients) to resolve. We explain what we've been saying for the past month, that we need X, Y, and Z at the bare minimum, and even that isn't market, etc. Clifford guy's response: "That sounds reasonable to me."

Thanks, Clifford guy. Could maybe have saved us some time if you said that about a month ago.
Makes sense, clifford chance is filled with some super shitty ppl

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Pokemon

Gold
Posts: 3528
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:58 pm

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by Pokemon » Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:33 am

Anonymous User wrote:
TheSpecialist wrote:I had a terrible experience with someone in my specialty area at Clifford Chance. Pretty large M&A deal and he wouldn't accept a single change to any terms, down to a comma. We try scaling back our comments and he comes back with the same exact language. Guy is a complete ass when we try talking on the phone and won't budge an inch. In the meantime, client doesn't really care and just wants to get the deal done. We make no progress and the night before signing, we need to join an all hands on deck call (including both clients) to resolve. We explain what we've been saying for the past month, that we need X, Y, and Z at the bare minimum, and even that isn't market, etc. Clifford guy's response: "That sounds reasonable to me."

Thanks, Clifford guy. Could maybe have saved us some time if you said that about a month ago.
Makes sense, clifford Chance is filled with some super shitty ppl

Ny office? I have found magic firms to be very difficult and always assumed it was so because of limited experience makes them stick at precedent at all cost even if changes would be better for all parties involved.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:40 am

Gordon Rees.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:12 am

Pro pers and solos from TTTTs. Although I had a basic negligence case with a very reasonable and not outrageous 2016 Infilaw grad. Compared to the usual ones I deal with, he was great to work with.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jun 24, 2017 1:06 pm

I will say - I think it's worse going against incompetent attorneys than competent assholes. On a pro bono matter I was against a small firm in the deep South - every motion looks like it was written by a tenth grader with a weak grasp on both the law and the English language. And I feel like the judge went out of their way to not call them on their bullshit.

I've had dickish opposing counsel from other Big Law firms, but I'll take that any day.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


FSK

Platinum
Posts: 8058
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:47 pm

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by FSK » Sat Jun 24, 2017 1:07 pm

Based on the exhibits I've reviewed while clerking it is 100% without a doubt the shitty small firms.
Last edited by FSK on Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
grand inquisitor

Gold
Posts: 3767
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 11:21 am

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by grand inquisitor » Sat Jun 24, 2017 1:52 pm

i loathe weil. quinn people have been really sweet.

barkschool

Silver
Posts: 1024
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:05 am

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by barkschool » Sat Jun 24, 2017 3:45 pm

clshopeful wrote:
hiima3L wrote:
Nebby wrote:
A. Nony Mouse wrote:If you really want to do this, you go first, Nebby.
Department of Justice
Yes, all 10,000,000 DOJ lawyers are bad.
This is what I was referring to. Last thing we need on TLS is even more generalizations. How can this thread even be taken seriously. You work on a case with opposing counsel at firm X. The 3 people you work with are all rude and are disrespectful. Therefore, the entire 12 office, 1200 lawyer firm is rude and disrespectful.
is this u or ur brother

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Sat Jun 24, 2017 4:13 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Pro pers and solos from TTTTs. Although I had a basic negligence case with a very reasonable and not outrageous 2016 Infilaw grad. Compared to the usual ones I deal with, he was great to work with.
A 2016 Infilaw grad had a case big enough to demand a legitimate firm's time? And he was actually handling it well?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


clshopeful

Bronze
Posts: 387
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 5:15 pm

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by clshopeful » Sat Jun 24, 2017 5:28 pm

barkschool wrote:
clshopeful wrote:
hiima3L wrote:
Nebby wrote:
A. Nony Mouse wrote:If you really want to do this, you go first, Nebby.
Department of Justice
Yes, all 10,000,000 DOJ lawyers are bad.
This is what I was referring to. Last thing we need on TLS is even more generalizations. How can this thread even be taken seriously. You work on a case with opposing counsel at firm X. The 3 people you work with are all rude and are disrespectful. Therefore, the entire 12 office, 1200 lawyer firm is rude and disrespectful.
is this u or ur brother
OK SO Then what happened?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Jun 25, 2017 1:42 am

Anonymous User wrote:Munger. by a mile.
Seconded.

lavarman84

Platinum
Posts: 8504
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by lavarman84 » Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:01 am

Anonymous User wrote:I will say - I think it's worse going against incompetent attorneys than competent assholes. On a pro bono matter I was against a small firm in the deep South - every motion looks like it was written by a tenth grader with a weak grasp on both the law and the English language. And I feel like the judge went out of their way to not call them on their bullshit.

I've had dickish opposing counsel from other Big Law firms, but I'll take that any day.
I feel like going against incompetent but well-meaning attorneys would be better than competent assholes.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: ITT we rank firms based on most atrocious opposing counsel

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:36 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Munger. by a mile.
Seconded.
I am curious by this. Could either of you give any flavor to what makes MTO atrocious to go against?

I agree with the earlier posters. The most atrocious opposing counsel I have had to deal with are solo practitioners or small plaintiffs' side firms, in particular, those who do employment work. It can be pretty frustrating to deal with insanely overbroad discovery requests, followed by repeated frivolous motions to compels, having to constantly rebut crazy, totally unsupportable legal theories, and irrational settlement demands.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”