Biglaw ---> Congress/Govt with debt
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:30 pm
Hi All - I'm a first year corporate associate at a V50 firm in NY. I'm one of these people who went corporate because they weren't gung-ho about litigation in law school and thought the grass would be greener, only to realize that corporate legal work is awful.
I want to transition to some type of job on the Hill (legal or non-legal, something I've always actually been interested in but disregarded as a career move for...reasons), but don't know the best way to go about it. Ideally I'd like to work for a member, but I think committee work would be very interesting as well. A complicating factor is that I have a massive amount of debt which I've already refinanced, and so I literally can't afford to just jump from biglaw to an LC/LA job at the moment. I think I need a solid 4-6 years in biglaw (or salary equivalent) to pay down my loans enough to maybe refi again and be able to afford an entry-level govt salary (and yes, I realize it made no sense to refi if I wanted to go govt).
It should be noted I have no Hill experience on my resume (I interned at a BigFed agency 1L). That being said, I've thought about a few paths after talking with a couple of people I know who work on the Hill. One option would be to stick with the corporate group at my firm for the next 4-5 years (I at least like the people I work with) and try to get involved with some of the regulatory-based work we do. After 4-5 years, try to jump to a member or committee's (maybe something like banking) staff at a more senior level and leverage my substantive knowledge. But does anyone on the Hill want substantive corporate legal knowledge, even regulatory? Would this be a waste of 5 years?
Another option would be to try and move to my firm's litigation group (we do general commercial lit and have a decently well regarded white collar/investigations group). I don't know the viability of this move (haven't talked to anyone at my firm about it) since I'm about to be done with my first year. It feels late in the game to try and make this switch, especially because I didn't do anything litigation-related in law school (non-LR journal, nothing published, no mock trial, etc). But let's say the firm let me move, does 4-5 years of litigation experience (especially with the white collar group) represent a much better use of the 5 years? Would this be much more attractive to a member/committee on the Hill and give me a chance at a senior level job despite my lack of Hill experience?
Any other creative solutions? I could see myself at a govt agency as well. Appreciate any insight, thanks.
I want to transition to some type of job on the Hill (legal or non-legal, something I've always actually been interested in but disregarded as a career move for...reasons), but don't know the best way to go about it. Ideally I'd like to work for a member, but I think committee work would be very interesting as well. A complicating factor is that I have a massive amount of debt which I've already refinanced, and so I literally can't afford to just jump from biglaw to an LC/LA job at the moment. I think I need a solid 4-6 years in biglaw (or salary equivalent) to pay down my loans enough to maybe refi again and be able to afford an entry-level govt salary (and yes, I realize it made no sense to refi if I wanted to go govt).
It should be noted I have no Hill experience on my resume (I interned at a BigFed agency 1L). That being said, I've thought about a few paths after talking with a couple of people I know who work on the Hill. One option would be to stick with the corporate group at my firm for the next 4-5 years (I at least like the people I work with) and try to get involved with some of the regulatory-based work we do. After 4-5 years, try to jump to a member or committee's (maybe something like banking) staff at a more senior level and leverage my substantive knowledge. But does anyone on the Hill want substantive corporate legal knowledge, even regulatory? Would this be a waste of 5 years?
Another option would be to try and move to my firm's litigation group (we do general commercial lit and have a decently well regarded white collar/investigations group). I don't know the viability of this move (haven't talked to anyone at my firm about it) since I'm about to be done with my first year. It feels late in the game to try and make this switch, especially because I didn't do anything litigation-related in law school (non-LR journal, nothing published, no mock trial, etc). But let's say the firm let me move, does 4-5 years of litigation experience (especially with the white collar group) represent a much better use of the 5 years? Would this be much more attractive to a member/committee on the Hill and give me a chance at a senior level job despite my lack of Hill experience?
Any other creative solutions? I could see myself at a govt agency as well. Appreciate any insight, thanks.