Page 1 of 1
SF litigation
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 10:34 pm
by BottomOfTotem
Outside of the super selective firms (i.e. Keker and MTO), what would be the top 10 firms in SF for litigation. This would be for those without a technical background.
Obviously this is subjective, but I would like to hear everyone's list. I am trying to ignore Vault, but chambers hasn't been overly helpful. So, hi there TLS...
Re: SF litigation
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:30 am
by rpupkin
BottomOfTotem wrote:Outside of the super selective firms (i.e. Keker and MTO), what would be the top 10 firms in SF for litigation. This would be for those without a technical background.
What is your definition of a "top firm?" This is a serious question. What do you want/value in a law firm?
Re: SF litigation
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:41 am
by BottomOfTotem
You're right, I should have been more clear. My apologies.
I'm mainly thinking of peer perception at this point, as in prestige. Additionally, any information regarding early responsibility and or good places to work are welcome.
Re: SF litigation
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:48 am
by hangold
If you're interested in antitrust, securities, or white collar work, firms that immediately come to mind are Latham and Gibson Dunn.
Re: SF litigation
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:12 pm
by sanzgo
second GD SF
Re: SF litigation
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:44 am
by BottomOfTotem
Bump.
But also, any thoughts on OMM, Cooley and or Orrick for SF lit?
Re: SF litigation
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:49 am
by jd20132013
All very prestigious.