Page 1 of 2

Kasowitz

Posted: Thu May 25, 2017 1:43 pm
by StateSchooler
Interested in lit and wondering what their deal is?

Is their reputation hurt by this whole Trump's legal crony image that seems to be in the news?

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Thu May 25, 2017 2:06 pm
by Borhas
Was Cochran's reputation hurt by representing killer OJ Simpson?

If Trump goes down everyone will blame Trump for being an idiot, if he doesn't Kasowitz will get some credit. I don't see how this is bad for him/them.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Thu May 25, 2017 4:26 pm
by deadpanic
Go look at the cases Marc Kasowitz has litigated for Trump. He lost most of them. He even argued the totally opposite holding of Clinton v. Jones for presidential immunity. The guy comes off to me as one of those lawyers that just papers, threatens, and tries to intimidate you to death to squeeze out a good result. All bark, no bite (kind of like Trump).

I have no idea on the firm as a whole with any personal knowledge. Just an observation.

I doubt it hurts them, though. Jones Day has been riding the Trump wave and I doubt its brand is going to take a hit even though they are a much larger firm.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Thu May 25, 2017 9:03 pm
by Pomeranian
Since when is being the law firm of choice for the POTUS a bad thing?

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Thu May 25, 2017 9:41 pm
by Lacepiece23
Pomeranian wrote:Since when is being the law firm of choice for the POTUS a bad thing?
Since Donald Trump became president...

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 11:36 pm
by Anonymous User
Hey! My two cents, I interviewed at Kasowitz for a 2L summer position (2016)...I ended up going with another firm because Kas is extremely litigation-oriented. If you're even a little unsure about whether you want to commit your foreseeable career to strictly lit, then I would look elsewhere. Also, the interview was kinda weird because all of the associates I interviewed with kept mentioning "layoffs" and "the mass exodus." I honestly had no idea that was a thing. It spooked me. The impression I got is that the turnover rate is high and most people who aren't fired, flee. The personality-types of a lot of the associates rang cold and overall, the office's energy was very anxious and toxic. That was just my experience, though.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 1:48 am
by Anonymous User
I have a friend who works there and he jokingly says the firm's headcount is 99% Jewish. It's not very diverse.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 11:59 am
by Anonymous User
Anecdotally, well before Trump, I know a handful of 2014 grads that ended up at Kasowitz and every single one was miserable and lateralled or otherwise left by choice within a year or so.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:14 am
by Anonymous User
If you're a smart 2L looking for a firm to spend a summer, or a federal clerk or mid-level looking to lateral, and you don't like Donald Trump (pretty common in New York), there are plenty of other firms to choose from. The positions Trump makes his lawyers take are really indefensible to liberal friends and family.

So I think Kasowitz will suffer from a recruiting perspective, which will medium-term erode the brand as they're less able to attract talent in New York. Same might be said for Morgan Lewis.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:22 am
by nyu2019maybeplease
What's the joke?
Anonymous User wrote:I have a friend who works there and he jokingly says the firm's headcount is 99% Jewish. It's not very diverse.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 6:56 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:If you're a smart 2L looking for a firm to spend a summer, or a federal clerk or mid-level looking to lateral, and you don't like Donald Trump (pretty common in New York), there are plenty of other firms to choose from. The positions Trump makes his lawyers take are really indefensible to liberal friends and family.

So I think Kasowitz will suffer from a recruiting perspective, which will medium-term erode the brand as they're less able to attract talent in New York. Same might be said for Morgan Lewis.
I can confirm they're already losing great attorneys over this.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 6:59 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:If you're a smart 2L looking for a firm to spend a summer, or a federal clerk or mid-level looking to lateral, and you don't like Donald Trump (pretty common in New York), there are plenty of other firms to choose from. The positions Trump makes his lawyers take are really indefensible to liberal friends and family.

So I think Kasowitz will suffer from a recruiting perspective, which will medium-term erode the brand as they're less able to attract talent in New York. Same might be said for Morgan Lewis.
I can confirm they're already losing great attorneys over this.
Can also confirm. Know someone there that is leaving because of the Trump situation. Doesn't want to stake his/her reputation on Kasowitz's decision with the Trump stuff.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 7:17 pm
by rpupkin
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:If you're a smart 2L looking for a firm to spend a summer, or a federal clerk or mid-level looking to lateral, and you don't like Donald Trump (pretty common in New York), there are plenty of other firms to choose from. The positions Trump makes his lawyers take are really indefensible to liberal friends and family.

So I think Kasowitz will suffer from a recruiting perspective, which will medium-term erode the brand as they're less able to attract talent in New York. Same might be said for Morgan Lewis.
I can confirm they're already losing great attorneys over this.
Can also confirm. Know someone there that is leaving because of the Trump situation. Doesn't want to stake his/her reputation on Kasowitz's decision with the Trump stuff.
Since you're both anonymous, do you mind sharing more details? Firms "lose" attorneys all the time. But is Kasowitz losing partners with books of business? That's the real question.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 7:30 pm
by Anonymous User
rpupkin wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:If you're a smart 2L looking for a firm to spend a summer, or a federal clerk or mid-level looking to lateral, and you don't like Donald Trump (pretty common in New York), there are plenty of other firms to choose from. The positions Trump makes his lawyers take are really indefensible to liberal friends and family.

So I think Kasowitz will suffer from a recruiting perspective, which will medium-term erode the brand as they're less able to attract talent in New York. Same might be said for Morgan Lewis.
I can confirm they're already losing great attorneys over this.
Can also confirm. Know someone there that is leaving because of the Trump situation. Doesn't want to stake his/her reputation on Kasowitz's decision with the Trump stuff.
Since you're both anonymous, do you mind sharing more details? Firms "lose" attorneys all the time. But is Kasowitz losing partners with books of business? That's the real question.
Im the second of the anonymous poster. I don't want to share more specifics without the blessing of the person in question, but I can say this person is not very junior. Otherwise I would like to be vague for now. I do know from the person the reason for leaving is reputational damage that has been done directly because of Trump-Kasowitz relationship. Doesn't want to be involved with that boat.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 7:32 pm
by rpupkin
Anonymous User wrote:Im the second of the anonymous poster. I don't want to share more specifics without the blessing of the person in question, but I can say this person is not very junior. Otherwise I would like to be vague for now. I do know from the person the reason for leaving is reputational damage that has been done directly because of Trump-Kasowitz relationship.
This is too vague to be interesting or revealing. If the person leaving is a senior associate or service partner, who cares?

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 7:43 pm
by Anonymous User
rpupkin wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Im the second of the anonymous poster. I don't want to share more specifics without the blessing of the person in question, but I can say this person is not very junior. Otherwise I would like to be vague for now. I do know from the person the reason for leaving is reputational damage that has been done directly because of Trump-Kasowitz relationship.
This is too vague to be interesting. If the person leaving is a senior associate or service partner, who cares?
Touche, but I will ask the person in question if I can reveal more.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 7:47 pm
by rpupkin
Anonymous User wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Im the second of the anonymous poster. I don't want to share more specifics without the blessing of the person in question, but I can say this person is not very junior. Otherwise I would like to be vague for now. I do know from the person the reason for leaving is reputational damage that has been done directly because of Trump-Kasowitz relationship.
This is too vague to be interesting. If the person leaving is a senior associate or service partner, who cares?
Touche, but I will ask the person in question if I can reveal more.
Sorry, I'm not trying to give you a hard time. But I think law students—who are the primary audience for these threads—struggle to appreciate what really matters. If Kasowitz gets less interest from students during OCI because of Marc Kasowitz's representation of Trump, that's not a serious problem for the firm. If a few associates lateral out because they're embarrassed to work at a firm that others associate with Trump, that's not a serious problem either. But if significant clients and/or business-generating partners bail because of Trump, that's when you know that Kasowitz is in trouble.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 7:54 pm
by Anonymous User
rpupkin wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Im the second of the anonymous poster. I don't want to share more specifics without the blessing of the person in question, but I can say this person is not very junior. Otherwise I would like to be vague for now. I do know from the person the reason for leaving is reputational damage that has been done directly because of Trump-Kasowitz relationship.
This is too vague to be interesting. If the person leaving is a senior associate or service partner, who cares?
Touche, but I will ask the person in question if I can reveal more.
Sorry, I'm not trying to give you a hard time. But I think law students—who are the primary audience for these threads—struggle to appreciate what really matters. If Kasowitz gets less interest from students during OCI because of Marc Kasowitz's representation of Trump, that's not a serious problem for the firm. If a few associates lateral out because they're embarrassed to work at a firm that others associate with Trump, that's not a serious problem either. But if significant clients and/or business-generating partners bail because of Trump, that's when you know that Kasowitz is in trouble.
Totally agree with you. But I would just say I don't think Kasowitz is a firm on the up.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:27 pm
by Anonymous User
rpupkin wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:If you're a smart 2L looking for a firm to spend a summer, or a federal clerk or mid-level looking to lateral, and you don't like Donald Trump (pretty common in New York), there are plenty of other firms to choose from. The positions Trump makes his lawyers take are really indefensible to liberal friends and family.

So I think Kasowitz will suffer from a recruiting perspective, which will medium-term erode the brand as they're less able to attract talent in New York. Same might be said for Morgan Lewis.
I can confirm they're already losing great attorneys over this.
Can also confirm. Know someone there that is leaving because of the Trump situation. Doesn't want to stake his/her reputation on Kasowitz's decision with the Trump stuff.
Since you're both anonymous, do you mind sharing more details? Firms "lose" attorneys all the time. But is Kasowitz losing partners with books of business? That's the real question.
Yup. Big time partner gone. I was told if this partner ever left it was time to jump ship.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:29 pm
by rpupkin
Anonymous User wrote:
rpupkin wrote: Since you're both anonymous, do you mind sharing more details? Firms "lose" attorneys all the time. But is Kasowitz losing partners with books of business? That's the real question.
Yup. Big time partner gone. I was told if this partner ever left it was time to jump ship.
That's big. If true, we'll probably see this news in the legal press any day now.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:41 pm
by Anonymous User
rpupkin wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
rpupkin wrote: Since you're both anonymous, do you mind sharing more details? Firms "lose" attorneys all the time. But is Kasowitz losing partners with books of business? That's the real question.
Yup. Big time partner gone. I was told if this partner ever left it was time to jump ship.
That's big. If true, we'll probably see this news in the legal press any day now.
Was already in the press.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:42 pm
by rpupkin
Anonymous User wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
rpupkin wrote: Since you're both anonymous, do you mind sharing more details? Firms "lose" attorneys all the time. But is Kasowitz losing partners with books of business? That's the real question.
Yup. Big time partner gone. I was told if this partner ever left it was time to jump ship.
That's big. If true, we'll probably see this news in the legal press any day now.
Was already in the press.
Link? I know that they lost a couple of partners to McKool earlier this year, but that was before the Trump stuff.

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 9:51 pm
by Pomeranian
Marc Kasowitz to Trump: "[Preet Bhahara] is going to get you!" :lol:

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:56 pm
by Anonymous User
deleted

Re: Kasowitz

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 5:49 pm
by ernie