Soft spoken
Posted: Thu May 25, 2017 12:03 am
If you're told that you're soft spoken by a partner, is that basically a no offer?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=278016
No.Anonymous User wrote:If you're told that you're soft spoken by a partner, is that basically a no offer?
Excellent advice. Also, invest in copious amounts of throat lozenges and carry them, along with bottled water, on your person at all times. Avoid cheeze its.jess wrote:just spend the rest of the summer shouting. it's still may
but it's prob not a good thing right? i guess it's hard to tell without context here...rpupkin wrote:No.Anonymous User wrote:If you're told that you're soft spoken by a partner, is that basically a no offer?
sanzgo wrote:but it's prob not a good thing right? i guess it's hard to tell without context here...rpupkin wrote:No.Anonymous User wrote:If you're told that you're soft spoken by a partner, is that basically a no offer?
jesus do you TLS SJWs ever stop. every thread.............lakers180 wrote:are you a woman?
sounds like some underhanded sexism, like smile more, talk louder, be less grumpy, don't be so soft spoken etc
just try to ignore, prolly nothing to worry about
So the comment preceded you acting nervous/soft spoken in an actual client interaction? The partner is probably trying to legitimately give you advice, so I would take it and work on it. I don't think most people would expect summer associates to be great/totally comfortable in front of clients at this stage in your career, so just take it in stride and try to improve (especially during future interactions with this partner.)Anonymous User wrote:Nah, I'm a guy. He said he noticed I was soft spoken and that because their clients are sophisticated (and they consider law clerks as future associates), those clients might think i lack confidence/don't know the law very well. Just responded by saying that "i heard that before and am trying to improve but my mindset was to be respectful." i gave 1 or 2 little awkward responses, plus that comment, makes me think i am not getting an offer...we'll see.
I will say you probably need to get over this though. When arguing before a Court I'm certainly polite but I argue my position and try to give the impression that I am 100% confident my position is correct. Similar concept with clients. No one expects an associate to know everything but you also don't want to give the impression that you know nothing.comparatively I know nothing so it's kind of funny to act confident when i don't know shit.
What are you even talking about?Anonymous User wrote:also he did not discuss salary with me, although i did write my preference on the employment form...is that bad?
Are you saying that all of this happened during an interview for a "law clerk" position at a firm? I think that everyone (including me) was assuming that you were told that you were soft spoken by a partner at a firm that you are already working at as a summer associate/law clerk. Generally when people say "no offer" here, they mean that you are not going to be offered a job at the end of your summer.Anonymous User wrote:it was a law clerk position. pay was not discussed during the interview. doesn't that mean he has no intention of hiring me?
agree with all of this except the last sentence. interview feedback is rare - take it and apply that in the next interview.Barrred wrote:Are you saying that all of this happened during an interview for a "law clerk" position at a firm? I think that everyone (including me) was assuming that you were told that you were soft spoken by a partner at a firm that you are already working at as a summer associate/law clerk. Generally when people say "no offer" here, they mean that you are not going to be offered a job at the end of your summer.Anonymous User wrote:it was a law clerk position. pay was not discussed during the interview. doesn't that mean he has no intention of hiring me?
If this all happened during an interview, then yes, it is probably a bad sign that the partner interviewing you openly criticized you for being soft-spoken and told you that clients would conclude that you are incompetent. But that partner also sounds like a dick.
He wasn't fucking wrong at all. Calling women too soft spoken is a really common kind of double standard complaint. So it didn't happen to apply here - it could have. And actually acknowledging sexism exists doesn't make someone a fucking SJW.ballouttacontrol wrote:jesus do you TLS SJWs ever stop. every thread.............lakers180 wrote:are you a woman?
sounds like some underhanded sexism, like smile more, talk louder, be less grumpy, don't be so soft spoken etc
just try to ignore, prolly nothing to worry about
Agree with ballouttacontrol here (including his disagreement with the last sentence above).ballouttacontrol wrote:agree with all of this except the last sentence. interview feedback is rare - take it and apply that in the next interview.Barrred wrote:Are you saying that all of this happened during an interview for a "law clerk" position at a firm? I think that everyone (including me) was assuming that you were told that you were soft spoken by a partner at a firm that you are already working at as a summer associate/law clerk. Generally when people say "no offer" here, they mean that you are not going to be offered a job at the end of your summer.Anonymous User wrote:it was a law clerk position. pay was not discussed during the interview. doesn't that mean he has no intention of hiring me?
If this all happened during an interview, then yes, it is probably a bad sign that the partner interviewing you openly criticized you for being soft-spoken and told you that clients would conclude that you are incompetent. But that partner also sounds like a dick.
Many threads I read seem to go off topic for posts/pages (depending on how long the thread is) on this or similar tangents and it's almost always just a long back and forth about "that was sexist" versus "no it wasn't." I get it's an important issue to people, but I also see where ballouttacontrol is coming from there when reading/responding to these threads. Although I have no idea what the hell a SJW is.He wasn't fucking wrong at all. Calling women too soft spoken is a really common kind of double standard complaint. So it didn't happen to apply here - it could have. And actually acknowledging sexism exists doesn't make someone a fucking SJW.
Why is the problem what you can't tell women rather than women being called bossy if they speak up and too quiet if they don't (which is entirely a real thing)?Anonymous User wrote:I thought criticizing women for being "bossy" when they speak up was the big complaint. You also can't tell women they need to speak up more?