Page 1 of 1

Inhouse counsel is required to take the CA bar in CA?

Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 8:21 pm
by Anonymous User
I will have a NY bar membership but work in CA.

Generally speaking, many companies require inhouse counsel with out-of-state membership to take the CA bar again?

How about law firms in CA?

Re: Inhouse counsel is required to take the CA bar in CA?

Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 8:28 pm
by SmokeytheBear
Anonymous User wrote:I will have a NY bar membership but work in CA.

Generally speaking, many companies require inhouse counsel with out-of-state membership to take the CA bar again?

How about law firms in CA?
Your questions isn't wholly clear. Are you asking whether a law firm situated in CA requires attorneys with out-of-state credentials who practice in CA to take the CA bar?

Yes. Absolutely. How is that even a question?

Re: Inhouse counsel is required to take the CA bar in CA?

Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 8:42 pm
by eav1277
If you practice immigration or something entirely federal, can't you practice with an out of state license?

If you are a general counsel, you likely wouldn't qualify for that exception

Re: Inhouse counsel is required to take the CA bar in CA?

Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 8:42 pm
by stego
SmokeytheBear wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I will have a NY bar membership but work in CA.

Generally speaking, many companies require inhouse counsel with out-of-state membership to take the CA bar again?

How about law firms in CA?
Your questions isn't wholly clear. Are you asking whether a law firm situated in CA requires attorneys with out-of-state credentials who practice in CA to take the CA bar?

Yes. Absolutely. How is that even a question?
He said in house counsel so he's not asking about law firms

Re: Inhouse counsel is required to take the CA bar in CA?

Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 8:47 pm
by LaLiLuLeLo
CA has a Registered In House Counsel status with the bar. Not sure if that's sufficient for most companies, though.