Wachtell litigation reputation Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428125
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Wachtell litigation reputation
Can anyone in NYC biglaw speak to the reputation of Wachtell's litigation practice? How does it stack up in quality of work/exit opportunities when compared to more litigation-focused shops?
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
Reputation and exit options are as good as or better than anywhere in NYC big law.Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone in NYC biglaw speak to the reputation of Wachtell's litigation practice? How does it stack up in quality of work/exit opportunities when compared to more litigation-focused shops?
- quiver
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:46 pm
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
Yeah, this.rpupkin wrote:Reputation and exit options are as good as or better than anywhere in NYC big law.Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone in NYC biglaw speak to the reputation of Wachtell's litigation practice? How does it stack up in quality of work/exit opportunities when compared to more litigation-focused shops?
-
- Posts: 428125
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
Does anyone know whether Wachtell has decent antitrust litigation group? I mean this as distinct from a purely corporate merger review advisory practice, which I know they have.
-
- Posts: 428125
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
Current employee, my impression is not really.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
Is Yale a good law school?
- Dr. Nefario
- Posts: 2866
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:07 pm
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
Not if you wanna do health care transactions in the Georgia market.Nebby wrote:Is Yale a good law school?
- Lincoln
- Posts: 1208
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:27 pm
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
This is true, but my impression of Wachtell's litigation group is that it focuses on a narrower practice area than some of its (arguable) Big Law peers like Cravath, PW, DPW or litigation boutiques like Patterson, Susman etc. The litigation group derives a lot of its work from the corporate group, so the litigation partners tend to focus on merger-related and white collar litigation. If you want a broader practice that includes, say, IP, products liability, antitrust litigation, or really anything that is not deal-derived litigation, Wachtell may not be the best place to be.rpupkin wrote:Reputation and exit options are as good as or better than anywhere in NYC big law.Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone in NYC biglaw speak to the reputation of Wachtell's litigation practice? How does it stack up in quality of work/exit opportunities when compared to more litigation-focused shops?
Caveat: I have not worked at Wachtell, but I have friends and former co-workers who do, and I worked at a firm that frequently goes up against them.
-
- Posts: 428125
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
Wachtell's litigation group is stellar, as you would expect. The conventional wisdom that they simply do merger litigation is ridiculous, as their litigation group does a ton of high impact securities litigation, derivative litigation, and commercial litigation. Their white collar practice is as good as it gets: in the past 6 months, several litigators have gone to SDNY, EDVA, NDCal, and CDCal for AUSA positions. If you can make it to year 7 or 8, another law firm will hire you as a partner if you don't make it at WLRK (which is nearly impossible in litigation).
- Lincoln
- Posts: 1208
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:27 pm
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
What are some (publicly available) examples of this? Just curious, because I never seem to hear anyone mention this (including at Wachtell recruiting events that I've been to).Anonymous User wrote:Wachtell's litigation group is stellar, as you would expect. The conventional wisdom that they simply do merger litigation is ridiculous, as their litigation group does a ton of high impact securities litigation, derivative litigation, and commercial litigation. Their white collar practice is as good as it gets: in the past 6 months, several litigators have gone to SDNY, EDVA, NDCal, and CDCal for AUSA positions. If you can make it to year 7 or 8, another law firm will hire you as a partner if you don't make it at WLRK (which is nearly impossible in litigation).
Totally agree on the white collar point. Notably, I was told that the last round of hires at SDNY USAO were all from Wachtell.
-
- Posts: 428125
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
They did the world trade center building litigation which was one of the most significant commercial lit disputes in NYC for a time.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
Why is that the case?Anonymous User wrote:Wachtell's litigation group is stellar, as you would expect. The conventional wisdom that they simply do merger litigation is ridiculous, as their litigation group does a ton of high impact securities litigation, derivative litigation, and commercial litigation. Their white collar practice is as good as it gets: in the past 6 months, several litigators have gone to SDNY, EDVA, NDCal, and CDCal for AUSA positions. If you can make it to year 7 or 8, another law firm will hire you as a partner if you don't make it at WLRK (which is nearly impossible in litigation).
-
- Posts: 428125
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
so if you were otherwise qualified (top school, good grades, good COA clerkship) and wanted to break into their litigation group, what would be the best practice group to pitch? just white collar and securities? any way to avoid pure securities? I would be more interested in merger litigation, antitrust, white collar, or commercial, TBH.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428125
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
The merger stuff is really handled by the same set of litigation associates. Other associates will pitch in if asked.Anonymous User wrote:so if you were otherwise qualified (top school, good grades, good COA clerkship) and wanted to break into their litigation group, what would be the best practice group to pitch? just white collar and securities? any way to avoid pure securities? I would be more interested in merger litigation, antitrust, white collar, or commercial, TBH.
Mainly, there's white collar stuff, but impossible to make partner doing it, so these are generally associates who want to make the shift to AUSA. There's securities lit and shareholder litigation. If you're really really good you can make partner doing it.
Two main reasons why litigation associates don't make partner, in my opinion: (1) litigation at WLRK is not as profitable as the corporate work; and (2) even though litigators regularly bill 2800 hours, they aren't working nearly as hard as their corporate counterparts who are machines by necessity.
Edit: to break into WLRK lit group, just be smart, push back against the partners in your interviews, show that you have some ideas and value to add.
-
- Posts: 428125
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
Out of topic - but does Wachtell lit hire only people with clerkships under their belt?
- Pragmatic Gun
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:25 pm
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
Tagging this thread to see the answer to this question.Nebby wrote:Is Yale a good law school?
- KissMyAxe
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:01 pm
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
It's a flawed question. Yale's a good school, but the inclusion of the word law assumes that students learn law there. That is a gross misconception.Pragmatic Gun wrote:Tagging this thread to see the answer to this question.Nebby wrote:Is Yale a good law school?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428125
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
No and law review is not required either, but if you're at WLRK in lit, your grades should be really high to where it is no question that you could clerk if you desired.Anonymous User wrote:Out of topic - but does Wachtell lit hire only people with clerkships under their belt?
-
- Posts: 428125
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
Don't they make a new litigation partner almost every year?Anonymous User wrote:The merger stuff is really handled by the same set of litigation associates. Other associates will pitch in if asked.Anonymous User wrote:so if you were otherwise qualified (top school, good grades, good COA clerkship) and wanted to break into their litigation group, what would be the best practice group to pitch? just white collar and securities? any way to avoid pure securities? I would be more interested in merger litigation, antitrust, white collar, or commercial, TBH.
Mainly, there's white collar stuff, but impossible to make partner doing it, so these are generally associates who want to make the shift to AUSA. There's securities lit and shareholder litigation. If you're really really good you can make partner doing it.
Two main reasons why litigation associates don't make partner, in my opinion: (1) litigation at WLRK is not as profitable as the corporate work; and (2) even though litigators regularly bill 2800 hours, they aren't working nearly as hard as their corporate counterparts who are machines by necessity.
Edit: to break into WLRK lit group, just be smart, push back against the partners in your interviews, show that you have some ideas and value to add.
- Pragmatic Gun
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:25 pm
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
He was being sarcastic doeKissMyAxe wrote:It's a flawed question. Yale's a good school, but the inclusion of the word law assumes that students learn law there. That is a gross misconception.Pragmatic Gun wrote:Tagging this thread to see the answer to this question.Nebby wrote:Is Yale a good law school?
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
I believe so was Mr. AxePragmatic Gun wrote:He was being sarcastic doeKissMyAxe wrote:It's a flawed question. Yale's a good school, but the inclusion of the word law assumes that students learn law there. That is a gross misconception.Pragmatic Gun wrote:Tagging this thread to see the answer to this question.Nebby wrote:Is Yale a good law school?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428125
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
can confirm neither LR nor clerkship is required for an offer, at least during OCIAnonymous User wrote:No and law review is not required either, but if you're at WLRK in lit, your grades should be really high to where it is no question that you could clerk if you desired.Anonymous User wrote:Out of topic - but does Wachtell lit hire only people with clerkships under their belt?
-
- Posts: 428125
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
Can anyone comment about Wachtell's hiring after completing federal clerkships? Do they hire clerks who have not summered there? How hard is it to get—harder or easier than at OCI? Just curious!
-
- Posts: 428125
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
As a general matter, they rarely hire laterals. In recent years, they've hired laterals from firms and from clerkships, but generally its like 1-2 people a year. Its extremely difficult to get hired there as a lateral.Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone comment about Wachtell's hiring after completing federal clerkships? Do they hire clerks who have not summered there? How hard is it to get—harder or easier than at OCI? Just curious!
-
- Posts: 428125
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Wachtell litigation reputation
are you really considered a 'lateral' coming off a clerkship when you have no substantial practice experience elsewhere?Anonymous User wrote:As a general matter, they rarely hire laterals. In recent years, they've hired laterals from firms and from clerkships, but generally its like 1-2 people a year. Its extremely difficult to get hired there as a lateral.Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone comment about Wachtell's hiring after completing federal clerkships? Do they hire clerks who have not summered there? How hard is it to get—harder or easier than at OCI? Just curious!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login