Big4 in a state/city I want to work in or law firm in a region I do not prefer?
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:03 am
Let me premise this by saying that I have no strong desire to go to BigLaw. I read a lot of posts on here about people wanting to jump from Big4 to BigLaw and the responses are that is an extremely hard jump, but that is not my goal (particularly because I have a family and little debt from school).
So, I studied finance in undergrad then went to a lower tier law school (think of those ranked in the 60-80 range). Now, I have two job offers (both out of my home state). At the Big4 job, I would work with the M&A team in a city/state that I want to live and build a career. In a perfect world, I would have gotten a decent law firm job in this city. The law firm offer is with a smaller firm (~30 attorneys) in which I would work primarily on business transactions with some trust & estates work thrown in. Also, the law firm pays ~20k more. However, the law firm position is in a city/state that neither I nor my family have any connection to, and I feel like we would want to leave after a few years.
Both cities are relatively cheap CoL when compared to NYC, SF, Chicago, etc.
My main question is which is better for an overall career, particularly if I want to be in a mid-sized law firm doing transactional work in the future?
Edit: I did not attend a high-tier law school (think ranked in the 60s or 70s), but I did graduate magna cum laude.
So, I studied finance in undergrad then went to a lower tier law school (think of those ranked in the 60-80 range). Now, I have two job offers (both out of my home state). At the Big4 job, I would work with the M&A team in a city/state that I want to live and build a career. In a perfect world, I would have gotten a decent law firm job in this city. The law firm offer is with a smaller firm (~30 attorneys) in which I would work primarily on business transactions with some trust & estates work thrown in. Also, the law firm pays ~20k more. However, the law firm position is in a city/state that neither I nor my family have any connection to, and I feel like we would want to leave after a few years.
Both cities are relatively cheap CoL when compared to NYC, SF, Chicago, etc.
My main question is which is better for an overall career, particularly if I want to be in a mid-sized law firm doing transactional work in the future?
Edit: I did not attend a high-tier law school (think ranked in the 60s or 70s), but I did graduate magna cum laude.