Negotiating for Class Year Bump (already started, not IP)
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 4:42 am
I'm a junior biglaw associate considering trying to negotiate a class year bump and am curious if people have experience themselves or have heard of others doing the same. (I found some other threads where IP folks negotiated starting as a second year, but I'm a 1st/2nd/3rd year who would be asking to get bumped to 2nd/3rd/4th year.)
Background - I'm a junior associate who works without partner supervision about 1/3 of the time and with nominal oversight another 1/3 of the time. This contrasts pretty sharply with the norms in my practice group, which generally don't allow associates to work without partner supervision until they're 5th or 6th years. The main reason I work alone so much is that I have expertise in an area of need that is shared by none of the other associates and only a couple partners. Obviously folks could be blowing smoke, but my feedback has been very positive and explicitly stated that work product/knowledge are way above seniority level. I think I would point to these comments and just say that I want to be paid commensurate with (or at least closer to) the level of work product, knowledge, and responsibility assumed.
I don't care what happens to my billing rate, because I will still be the cheapest available option in the firm for the work I do. Also don't care how partnership prospects could be affected - goal is to pay off loans, save a little, and GTFO of biglaw.
Background - I'm a junior associate who works without partner supervision about 1/3 of the time and with nominal oversight another 1/3 of the time. This contrasts pretty sharply with the norms in my practice group, which generally don't allow associates to work without partner supervision until they're 5th or 6th years. The main reason I work alone so much is that I have expertise in an area of need that is shared by none of the other associates and only a couple partners. Obviously folks could be blowing smoke, but my feedback has been very positive and explicitly stated that work product/knowledge are way above seniority level. I think I would point to these comments and just say that I want to be paid commensurate with (or at least closer to) the level of work product, knowledge, and responsibility assumed.
I don't care what happens to my billing rate, because I will still be the cheapest available option in the firm for the work I do. Also don't care how partnership prospects could be affected - goal is to pay off loans, save a little, and GTFO of biglaw.