Lucky Enough to have 2 1L SA offers; need help deciding
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 2:00 pm
As the title says, I applied broadly starting back in December to several firms for their SA positions and while the vast majority either said they were not hiring 1Ls or didn't say anything at all, by the time the dust settled I had two to choose from. I am leaning towards one at the moment, but wanted to get further input.
For reference: both Biglaw firms are in the city in which I plan on working after graduation. They also are essentially ranked the same and have about the same number of employees (one of them is near the bottom of the V100 while the other's just outside of that list, but I don't know how much that matters). Third, they both have essentially 100% offer rates 2L year.
Firm 1:
Hired through the Diversity program
Pays market for the city I'm in
Does work in the practice area I'm interested in, but more generally, and I would be doing work from various practice areas, both corporate and litigation
Of the people I met in the interviews, I got along very well with the partners, and got along fine with the associates (but nothing special)
Firm 2:
Hired specifically by one department based on my grades and my background in the practice area I'm interested in.
Pays the equivalent of $20k less annually than Firm 1
I would work specifically in the practice area I'm interested in, and almost exclusively in the sub-practice that I wanted to pursue
Of the people I met, I got along very well with all of them
Over the summer I would be traveling to another of their offices in a primary market for a couple of weeks to work with another set of attorneys
I am definitely leaning towards Firm 2, but it does pay less, and I'm not sure whether working with a specific department will pigeonhole me 2L year if I end up not liking that work. Also, I'm not sure if it makes a difference that Firm 1 was through a diversity program.
What do you think?
For reference: both Biglaw firms are in the city in which I plan on working after graduation. They also are essentially ranked the same and have about the same number of employees (one of them is near the bottom of the V100 while the other's just outside of that list, but I don't know how much that matters). Third, they both have essentially 100% offer rates 2L year.
Firm 1:
Hired through the Diversity program
Pays market for the city I'm in
Does work in the practice area I'm interested in, but more generally, and I would be doing work from various practice areas, both corporate and litigation
Of the people I met in the interviews, I got along very well with the partners, and got along fine with the associates (but nothing special)
Firm 2:
Hired specifically by one department based on my grades and my background in the practice area I'm interested in.
Pays the equivalent of $20k less annually than Firm 1
I would work specifically in the practice area I'm interested in, and almost exclusively in the sub-practice that I wanted to pursue
Of the people I met, I got along very well with all of them
Over the summer I would be traveling to another of their offices in a primary market for a couple of weeks to work with another set of attorneys
I am definitely leaning towards Firm 2, but it does pay less, and I'm not sure whether working with a specific department will pigeonhole me 2L year if I end up not liking that work. Also, I'm not sure if it makes a difference that Firm 1 was through a diversity program.
What do you think?