Which firms have lockstep partner compensation? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428480
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
As the title - are there very few firms who have this? Obviously Cravath does, but who else?
-
- Posts: 428480
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
Paul Weiss is like 98 percent lockstep
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
-
- Posts: 428480
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
Not OP. I'm trying to decide which firm I should work for based on whether partner's comp is lockstep.
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
You are joking, right?Anonymous User wrote:Not OP. I'm trying to decide which firm I should work for based on whether partner's comp is lockstep.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 9:18 pm
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
Cravath, Cleary, Debevoise. I believe there's one more.
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:50 am
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
Of all the possible reasons to choose a firm, this seems to be a pretty good one.RaceJudicata wrote:You are joking, right?Anonymous User wrote:Not OP. I'm trying to decide which firm I should work for based on whether partner's comp is lockstep.
-
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:24 pm
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
I thought DPW, STB and Skadden were too. Although, I think I heard that maybe STB modified theirs a couple years ago because Kirkland was poaching some of their younger partners.SLS_AMG wrote:Cravath, Cleary, Debevoise. I believe there's one more.
ETA: This is notgreat. That was an accidental anon.
-
- Posts: 428480
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
Are Covington lockstep? Thought I read that somewhere
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 12:40 pm
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
DPW is lockstep. Also correct on STB because of partners heading elsewhere for compensation-related reasons
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:50 am
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
Skadden is not lockstep. STB hasn't been pure lockstep for at least a decade and I think it's a safe assumption that this is the more common model (obviously not inconsistent that they've further loosened the system recently.).Anonymous User wrote:I thought DPW, STB and Skadden were too. Although, I think I heard that maybe STB modified theirs a couple years ago because Kirkland was poaching some of their younger partners.SLS_AMG wrote:Cravath, Cleary, Debevoise. I believe there's one more.
ETA: This is notgreat. That was an accidental anon.
I'm quite, but not 100%, sure that WLRK is pure lockstep.SLS_AMG wrote:Cravath, Cleary, Debevoise. I believe there's one more.
-
- Posts: 428480
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
Pretty sure Cov is black box rather than lockstep.Anonymous User wrote:Are Covington lockstep? Thought I read that somewhere
- Mr. Fancy
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:22 pm
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
When I interviewed there as a lateral, one of their selling points was that all partners pretty much made the same so that there was no competition and everyone works together.Anonymous User wrote:Pretty sure Cov is black box rather than lockstep.Anonymous User wrote:Are Covington lockstep? Thought I read that somewhere
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:24 pm
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
Ok, I was pretty sure Skadden was lockstep, but haven't paid attention recently. Wachtell isn't pure lockstep. It's like PW. Most of the partners are on lockstep, with a few of the senior people/rainmakers getting paid more.lawlorbust wrote:Skadden is not lockstep. STB hasn't been pure lockstep for at least a decade and I think it's a safe assumption that this is the more common model (obviously not inconsistent that they've further loosened the system recently.).Anonymous User wrote:I thought DPW, STB and Skadden were too. Although, I think I heard that maybe STB modified theirs a couple years ago because Kirkland was poaching some of their younger partners.SLS_AMG wrote:Cravath, Cleary, Debevoise. I believe there's one more.
ETA: This is notgreat. That was an accidental anon.
I'm quite, but not 100%, sure that WLRK is pure lockstep.SLS_AMG wrote:Cravath, Cleary, Debevoise. I believe there's one more.
-
- Posts: 428480
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
From what I gathered, it's black box but most people in a similar year range are close enough to not make it a pissing match.Mr. Fancy wrote:When I interviewed there as a lateral, one of their selling points was that all partners pretty much made the same so that there was no competition and everyone works together.Anonymous User wrote:Pretty sure Cov is black box rather than lockstep.Anonymous User wrote:Are Covington lockstep? Thought I read that somewhere
-
- Posts: 428480
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
(Anon from before who stated Cov is blackbox.) I have the same impression impression from the summer program last year. That said, I'm sure folks like Lanny Breuer and Eric Holder and other rainmakers (like in IP lit) are significantly better off than other partners. But given Cov's PPP, money isn't the reason why people stick around. It isn't often that you hear about Covington partners being poached (at least in DC), and they really emphasize the culture and sharing work among partners because there's at least less incentive to hoard work. But that said, my recollection is 99% that partner comp is blackbox—though it's clear that whatever is in that box, it's not just eat-what-you-kill in disguise.Anonymous User wrote:From what I gathered, it's black box but most people in a similar year range are close enough to not make it a pissing match.Mr. Fancy wrote:When I interviewed there as a lateral, one of their selling points was that all partners pretty much made the same so that there was no competition and everyone works together.Anonymous User wrote:Pretty sure Cov is black box rather than lockstep.Anonymous User wrote:Are Covington lockstep? Thought I read that somewhere
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 7:41 pm
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
Had a buddy whose Dad was a partner at STB; he said it was lockstep except you got bonus comp for being practice group head, serving on firm committees, etc. This was a few years ago though, so maybe they've changed stuff up given losses of partners to K&E etc.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
At most (or all) of these firms, chances at partnership are vanishingly small. Why does partner comp matter to you?lawlorbust wrote:Of all the possible reasons to choose a firm, this seems to be a pretty good one.RaceJudicata wrote:You are joking, right?Anonymous User wrote:Not OP. I'm trying to decide which firm I should work for based on whether partner's comp is lockstep.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 10:25 am
Re: Which firms have lockstep partner compensation?
This is absolutely a good reason to choose a firm. In fact, the low chances of partnership at a firm make this factor more important, because arguably lockstep compensation is bad for some partners, some of the time, but it is an unqualified good for associates. Lockstep partnership means a much more pleasant work environment, as the most greedy and shitty partners tend to self select for other places.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login