...
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 6:37 pm
...
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=269189
i still don't understand where this anecdotal stuff comes fromAnonymous User wrote:that Shearman's still slumping and is moving in the wrong direction.
My impression is that it's mostly fuelled by an uncomplicated look at Vault rankings. Shearman used to be V15. Now it's V40. No idea why that happened. No idea whether it really matters.PennBull wrote:i still don't understand where this anecdotal stuff comes fromAnonymous User wrote:that Shearman's still slumping and is moving in the wrong direction.
Vault overall rankings really don't matter. Dewey went up in Vault rankings right before it imploded. This year K&L Gates went up 8 spots when so many of its partners are leaving (it no-offered 10 summers last year). Look at Milbank's place in the rankings when it's one of the most profitable firms. Vault regional rankings (New York etc) are more stable and seem to at least reflect how junior associates view firms in their markets to some extent. For a comparison of prestige, Vault website has a separate selectivity rankings as well. The overall rankings is just useless. Just looking at it simplistically, how Cravath is ahead of Wachtell in the overall rankings when it is behind Wachtell in the New York rankings doesn't make any sense, does it?stoopkid13 wrote:My impression is that it's mostly fuelled by an uncomplicated look at Vault rankings. Shearman used to be V15. Now it's V40. No idea why that happened. No idea whether it really matters.PennBull wrote:i still don't understand where this anecdotal stuff comes fromAnonymous User wrote:that Shearman's still slumping and is moving in the wrong direction.