Page 1 of 1
Hogan v. Milbank v. Kaye Scholer v. Stroock v. Winston (all NY)
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 1:01 am
by Anonymous User
I am interested in corporate or real estate work. I liked the people I met at Milbank, but they don't really do real estate which is somewhat of an issue for me.
Re: Hogan v. Milbank v. Kaye Scholer v. Stroock v. Winston (all NY)
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 2:24 am
by Anonymous User
you want to do real estate.
kaye scholer and stroock are the only firms on your list with actual real estate practices in NY. choose between the two i guess. stroock is still at 160k. go with with kaye. but i hear stroock has nice people so maybe that might be enough to weigh in its favor.
Re: Hogan v. Milbank v. Kaye Scholer v. Stroock v. Winston (all NY)
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 8:12 am
by Anonymous User
Stroock did go to 180k
I'm a former Stroock associate if you have any questions. I agree about the nice people.
Re: Hogan v. Milbank v. Kaye Scholer v. Stroock v. Winston (all NY)
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:01 pm
by Anonymous User
when did you hear from stroock?
Re: Hogan v. Milbank v. Kaye Scholer v. Stroock v. Winston (all NY)
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:12 pm
by 1styearlateral
Anonymous User wrote:I liked the people I met at Milbank, but they don't really do real estate which is somewhat of an issue for me.
Milbank very much has a real estate practice, but it's mostly (if not all) real estate finance/transactions.
That being said, my firm deals with Strook regularly. I'd say they have a much broader RE practice group.