Akin Gump v Proskauer v Sidley v Hogan Lovells v Kirkland (all NY) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Locked
Anonymous User
Posts: 428459
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Akin Gump v Proskauer v Sidley v Hogan Lovells v Kirkland (all NY)

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:00 pm

Really having a hard time narrowing down my choices so I'm hoping some TLS anecdotes/ tips will give me a little bit of direction as I do my research. I think there were some great people at each firm so I can't rule anyone out just based on my CBs.

Btw I'm primarily interested in litigation.

User avatar
TLSModBot

Diamond
Posts: 14835
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am

Re: Akin Gump v Proskauer v Sidley v Hogan Lovells v Kirkland (all NY)

Post by TLSModBot » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:05 pm

Obviously Kirkland. Never Akin.

Locked

Return to “Legal Employment”