Anonymous User wrote:Choosing between Cleary, Weil and Latham (all New York offices). Also considering Debevoise, but have mostly ruled them out because of the people/culture. Liked the people at all 3, but probably the most at Weil. Looking purely at litigation. Undecided about what kind of litigation, but considering product liability/mass torts (but really just undecided). I know Cleary is probably a cut above in corporate, but does that hold for litigation? Any other perceived caliber differences between these firms? I know Vault and PPP are of limited utility, but is Weil's weaker performance in those metrics indicative of a more general slide? Also, where am I more likely to get better experience (take a deposition first)?
Thanks!
Weil these are all Cleary good firms (couldn't resist). Just based on Chambers for general litigation (since you're still undecided),
http://www.chambersandpartners.com/1280 ... torial/5/1, it'd come down to Latham or Weil, unless you have reasons that favor Cleary. Weil NY/Mothership is a different animal than its other offices, but most of what I hear about Weil is not positive. Latham still has its rap from 08/09, but since then has been doing very well financially/growing. Just depends on what flavor of kool-aid you like to drink.
Band 1
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Affiliates
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Band 2
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Latham & Watkins LLP
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Simpson Thacher &
bartlett llp
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Band 3
Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP