answered
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 6:18 pm
...
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=265515
Kind of seems like sensitive information and inappropriate to talk about. Maybe think of a different reason to say, like looking for more of a challenge or something?Anonymous User wrote:If it comes up, is this something I want to mention? My current firm is currently in a deep hole for several wrongdoings and the feds came down hard on it. I have nothing to do with it as a law clerk and not yet having received any full time associate offer.
I am in the process of jumping ship and finding a new job. If they ask, is this something I should disclose and say I had no part in it and it was kept hidden from new hires? (including me the law clerk)
LeDique wrote:i only clicked this thread to find out about your firm's space exploration but now i'm really disappointed
OP here. I did associate work. No paralegal. The main reason why I took this job on while waiting on bar results was a promise that I would get amazing litigation experience, which I did. Now although I love my boss and co-workers, it's been 6 months since I had passed the July bar and sworn in.dixiecupdrinking wrote:You're really focusing on the wrong details here. Forget about the Feds and the firm's problems. The way to explain that is simple: "It's a small firm that expected to hire me on a permanent basis but circumstances prevented it from being able to."
What work did you do as a "law clerk?" Is it basically attorney-level work or were you more like a paralegal or file clerk? How long is "prolonged?" Months? Years?
Well it's better to be paid than not pay. It's not that I need the money but I don't want to be home searching for jobs all day. I do that at work while being paid and post on tls lol. I am just curious about what would be the best way to explain my situation without prompting more questions.ClubberLang wrote:You should leave the firm immediately. IMHO, ongoing association with the firm hurts you more than helps. An employer may wonder why you haven't left already, given that your pay is low and you're still a clerk with no immediate hope for advancement. If you talk about the "feds" freezing this firms assets as the reason you haven't been promoted during interviews, I'd assume it is an auto-ding. Generally it is easier to find a job when you have a job, but this seems to be an exception.
OP here. Because it would cause the employer to think I am incompetent and that is the reason why they are not offering. It would be weird to hire something pending bar results without plans to keep them as law clerk. I chose not to quit because litigation side of the firm is fine and I think it's better to work and build experience even if the pay is terrible.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Why can't you just say the firm isn't in a position to give you a permanent job? This stuff happens all the time. I don't get what the problem is.
I don't think that's true. "Law clerk" implies a degree of nonpermanance and small firms don't always have capacity to hire people. I think it would be eminently reasonable to say "they hoped to keep me on after law school but unfortunately they haven't had the need to hire new associates on a permanent basis, so I'm looking elsewhere." Your supervisor is supportive so hopefully s/he will corroborate that they wanted to keep you but aren't in a position to do so. You're making this too complicated.Anonymous User wrote:OP here. Because it would cause the employer to think I am incompetent and that is the reason why they are not offering. It would be weird to hire something pending bar results without plans to keep them as law clerk. I chose not to quit because litigation side of the firm is fine and I think it's better to work and build experience even if the pay is terrible.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Why can't you just say the firm isn't in a position to give you a permanent job? This stuff happens all the time. I don't get what the problem is.
Why would the firm jump to that conclusion? Especially if it is another smaller firm, they are going to understand that firms won't be able to hire every temporary clerk they bring in regardless of how qualified they are.Anonymous User wrote:OP here. Because it would cause the employer to think I am incompetent and that is the reason why they are not offering. It would be weird to hire something pending bar results without plans to keep them as law clerk. I chose not to quit because litigation side of the firm is fine and I think it's better to work and build experience even if the pay is terrible.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Why can't you just say the firm isn't in a position to give you a permanent job? This stuff happens all the time. I don't get what the problem is.