On track for 1250 hours first year, worry? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
First year in 160k big law in Texas. Worried about hours. I've been low 100s for three consecutive months, billed 40 and 70 the two months before that. Is this normal for a first year? I don't understand how it is remotely possible for me to work so little and have a budget like this:
$1700: rent for "luxury" apt
$1000: groceries
$1000: car payment
$500: bars and dining out
$2,800: Omega Seamaster for my dad's birthday
$1,333.33: maxed out 401(k) savings
$1,000: left over
[no loans]
In what other profession, society, or historical epoch has this ever been possible? I must be getting fired soon, right?
$1700: rent for "luxury" apt
$1000: groceries
$1000: car payment
$500: bars and dining out
$2,800: Omega Seamaster for my dad's birthday
$1,333.33: maxed out 401(k) savings
$1,000: left over
[no loans]
In what other profession, society, or historical epoch has this ever been possible? I must be getting fired soon, right?
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2015 8:38 pm
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
I would be worried about your job. Also, how do you possibly spend $1000 on groceries AND $500 on dining out?
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
Also a Texas first year and my hours will likely be worse than yours. Good luck dude.Anonymous User wrote:First year in 160k big law in Texas. Worried about hours. I've been low 100s for three consecutive months, billed 40 and 70 the two months before that. Is this normal for a first year? I don't understand how it is remotely possible for me to work so little and have a budget like this:
$1700: rent for "luxury" apt
$1000: groceries
$1000: car payment
$500: bars and dining out
$2,800: Omega Seamaster for my dad's birthday
$1,333.33: maxed out 401(k) savings
$1,000: left over
[no loans]
In what other profession, society, or historical epoch has this ever been possible? I must be getting fired soon, right?
-
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
why an Omega and not an "inexpensive" Rolex?
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
If you were in your stub year, I would say don't worry. In your first full year, that far below where you should be, definitely worry.
Also worry about the fact that you're making $160,000 but still spending $1,000 a month to buy cars with borrowed money. Stop being a consumer sucker and start saving for unemployment.
Also worry about the fact that you're making $160,000 but still spending $1,000 a month to buy cars with borrowed money. Stop being a consumer sucker and start saving for unemployment.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
Yes, I'm in my ninth month and I've helped close exactly one deal. I am aggressively looking to lateral so I can support my mindless consumerism with a more stable job.SBL wrote:If you were in your stub year, I would say don't worry. In your first full year, that far below where you should be, definitely worry.
Also worry about the fact that you're making $160,000 but still spending $1,000 a month to buy cars with borrowed money. Stop being a consumer sucker and start saving for unemployment.
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
If you're doing transactional biglaw in TX my guess is you are already on shaky ground because the energy industry is kind of a mess right now. Also you make more than enough to just save up and buy cars. Don't be a fool, fool.Anonymous User wrote:Yes, I'm in my ninth month and I've helped close exactly one deal. I am aggressively looking to lateral so I can support my mindless consumerism with a more stable job.SBL wrote:If you were in your stub year, I would say don't worry. In your first full year, that far below where you should be, definitely worry.
Also worry about the fact that you're making $160,000 but still spending $1,000 a month to buy cars with borrowed money. Stop being a consumer sucker and start saving for unemployment.
-
- Posts: 387
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 5:15 pm
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
seriously though, 1500 a month on food? wtf
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
What I find baffling is that the dining out bill is only half of the grocery bill. These numbers only make sense if OP is a 300-pound bodybuilder who shops at Whole Foods.clshopeful wrote:seriously though, 1500 a month on food? wtf
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
$1,000 in groceries is quite reasonable since I shop for myself and family. Also $500 is only one date night a week at any halfway decent restaurant.SBL wrote:What I find baffling is that the dining out bill is only half of the grocery bill. These numbers only make sense if OP is a 300-pound bodybuilder who shops at Whole Foods.clshopeful wrote:seriously though, 1500 a month on food? wtf
Sorry, the budget was for illustrative purposes only. The point is I think doing so little to make so much money feels absurd, and looks like my fears are confirmed.
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
Your family is killing your budget. Any chance you can get rid of them and lone wolf it?Anonymous User wrote:$1,000 in groceries is quite reasonable since I shop for myself and family. Also $500 is only one date night a week at any halfway decent restaurant.SBL wrote:What I find baffling is that the dining out bill is only half of the grocery bill. These numbers only make sense if OP is a 300-pound bodybuilder who shops at Whole Foods.clshopeful wrote:seriously though, 1500 a month on food? wtf
Sorry, the budget was for illustrative purposes only. The point is I think doing so little to make so much money feels absurd, and looks like my fears are confirmed.
You could probably make a few bucks selling them to human traffickers and use the cash to float you through unemployment.
-
- Posts: 387
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 5:15 pm
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
I'm probably just used to having under $100 in my debit card for the last 4 years.SBL wrote:Your family is killing your budget. Any chance you can get rid of them and lone wolf it?Anonymous User wrote:$1,000 in groceries is quite reasonable since I shop for myself and family. Also $500 is only one date night a week at any halfway decent restaurant.SBL wrote:What I find baffling is that the dining out bill is only half of the grocery bill. These numbers only make sense if OP is a 300-pound bodybuilder who shops at Whole Foods.clshopeful wrote:seriously though, 1500 a month on food? wtf
Sorry, the budget was for illustrative purposes only. The point is I think doing so little to make so much money feels absurd, and looks like my fears are confirmed.
You could probably make a few bucks selling them to human traffickers and use the cash to float you through unemployment.
- Br3v
- Posts: 4290
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
Tbh I thought an Omega Seamaster was a jet skimvp99 wrote:why an Omega and not an "inexpensive" Rolex?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
I read it as "Semenster" and thought to myself ranch dressing cannon - smart buyBr3v wrote:Tbh I thought an Omega Seamaster was a jet skimvp99 wrote:why an Omega and not an "inexpensive" Rolex?
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 5:43 am
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
If you're as incompetent at law as you are at personal finance you deserve to get fired.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
I'm going to strike a slightly more optimistic note than most in this thread.
It sounds like you're only five months in. Your hours are definitely on the low side, but it's not uncommon for associates to have very low hours in their first six months. It's increasingly tough to staff first-years on anything. But once the firm puts you on the right matter/case, it's amazing how quickly you can go from 100 hours a month to 250. And then you'll be longing for the days when your only worry was low hours.
Anyway, I think mild concern is called for, but not full-blown-I'm-gonna-get-fired anxiety.
It sounds like you're only five months in. Your hours are definitely on the low side, but it's not uncommon for associates to have very low hours in their first six months. It's increasingly tough to staff first-years on anything. But once the firm puts you on the right matter/case, it's amazing how quickly you can go from 100 hours a month to 250. And then you'll be longing for the days when your only worry was low hours.
Anyway, I think mild concern is called for, but not full-blown-I'm-gonna-get-fired anxiety.
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
TX transactional is probably not the safest right now oven state of energy marketrpupkin wrote:I'm going to strike a slightly more optimistic note than most in this thread.
It sounds like you're only five months in. Your hours are definitely on the low side, but it's not uncommon for associates to have very low hours in their first six months. It's increasingly tough to staff first-years on anything. But once the firm puts you on the right matter/case, it's amazing how quickly you can go from 100 hours a month to 250. And then you'll be longing for the days when your only worry was low hours.
Anyway, I think mild concern is called for, but not full-blown-I'm-gonna-get-fired anxiety.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
I think the expectation in TX is that business will pop in second half of 2016, first half of 2017. If that doesn't happen then I'll be very worried.SBL wrote:TX transactional is probably not the safest right now oven state of energy marketrpupkin wrote:I'm going to strike a slightly more optimistic note than most in this thread.
It sounds like you're only five months in. Your hours are definitely on the low side, but it's not uncommon for associates to have very low hours in their first six months. It's increasingly tough to staff first-years on anything. But once the firm puts you on the right matter/case, it's amazing how quickly you can go from 100 hours a month to 250. And then you'll be longing for the days when your only worry was low hours.
Anyway, I think mild concern is called for, but not full-blown-I'm-gonna-get-fired anxiety.
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
I would worry somewhat, based on my own experience, but not that you're going to get axed right away. It just seems that in my experience people either get in the flow right off the bat or they never really do. I don't even think the firm gets that. They are constantly telling people not to worry about low first-year hours, but that's only because they don't give a shit about you.
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
I'm in the exact same boat - on track to bill roughly 1300 in my first full year. Should my worries be at least a bit assuaged if my hours are slowly trending upward: 58 hours in Feb but closer to 150 hours in May. . . Right now, however, my plate is pretty empty so June will probably not continue the upward trend.
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
It depends. Do you feel like you are at least cultivating steady sources of future work?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
Yes, I like to think so. Small satellite office with only a few partners to give work in my practice group. I'm on several matters (litigation), but none of them has any activity right now. The other associates with more experience are all billing at least 40 hours/week. It seems I just get the leftovers.
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
That's low enough that you should worry regardless. I'm also a first year but am being stealthed so I was really worried but accepted it. Lesson for the wise is if a partner who tried to get you fired is friendly a month later, they haven't warmed up to you. Do not tell them which other partners you're working with. A large # of attorneys have the emotional IQ of a 6-year old. Don't make the mistake of assuming you're in a professional setting, and not kindergarten. There's a reason these people need hours of training on how to behave at a cocktail party.
-
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:33 pm
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
What do you do when you're slow? Do you just go home? at low 100s a month, that's like 5 hours a day. I think if you use that extra time productively, you can be okay. Help write some articles, etc. It's non-billable but people will notice. Sign up for pro-bono. Even if it doesnt count to your hours, you'll learn alot.
You're right. Nobody is going to pay 160k for someone who works 5 hours a day. I've had my own slow months but even in a month with 100 billable hours, I'll have 50 nonbillable hours and 50 pro bono hours to go with it.
You're right. Nobody is going to pay 160k for someone who works 5 hours a day. I've had my own slow months but even in a month with 100 billable hours, I'll have 50 nonbillable hours and 50 pro bono hours to go with it.
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On track for 1250 hours first year, worry?
At my old firm as a first year you'd probably be safe if your numbers were trending up like that. 150 is right below the sweet spot (166.67) but consistently hitting 150 plus the odd 200+ month puts you safely over 2000 for the year. Everyone knows first years can start off slow. If your numbers dip down into the double digits again, I'd start being concerned. If your three month rolling average projects to ~2000+, you usually shouldn't worry. You're getting work and are profitable for the firm for the foreseeable future.Anonymous User wrote:I'm in the exact same boat - on track to bill roughly 1300 in my first full year. Should my worries be at least a bit assuaged if my hours are slowly trending upward: 58 hours in Feb but closer to 150 hours in May. . . Right now, however, my plate is pretty empty so June will probably not continue the upward trend.
The old firm has fired a few first years for hours / performance related reasons in the past few years. Those individuals were consistently really low, like under 100 hours a month for pretty much the whole year. Part of that was because there wasn't enough work to go around, part of that was because they'd been tarnished by some error at the very beginning of their time at the job and had no hope of escaping that black mark.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login