Lottery v no lottery
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:35 pm
I can't find a recent post that discusses this. What's better for students a pure lottery, partial lottery, or no lottery for OCI? Benefits and pitfalls of each?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=262321
Dr. Nefario wrote:I can't find a recent post that discusses this. What's better for students a pure lottery, partial lottery, or no lottery for OCI? Benefits and pitfalls of each?
Basically. From a "choosing a law school" standpoint, you would want pure lottery because you can probably assume you will be around median.sublime wrote:It depends on your credentials.
If you are top of your class, preselect is better.
If you are not, lottery is better.
For example, top of the class at my T20 which is entirely preselect can get like 40+ screeners. On the other hand, if you are below a certain point, you can get none.
This. Pure lottery seems to work great for schools like Cornell: http://www.lstscorereports.com/schools/cornell/Anonymous User wrote:Basically. From a "choosing a law school" standpoint, you would want pure lottery because you can probably assume you will be around median.sublime wrote:It depends on your credentials.
If you are top of your class, preselect is better.
If you are not, lottery is better.
For example, top of the class at my T20 which is entirely preselect can get like 40+ screeners. On the other hand, if you are below a certain point, you can get none.
I think pure lottery is pretty standard throughout the T-14. I know UVA has some pre-select, anyone know the others that differ?favabeansoup wrote: Pure lottery seems strange to me and seems like it would only work at HYS not other schools.
I think pre-select can help for secondaries if you have ties and it shows (or you can make it show) in the materials you submit. The above is definitely true for NYC/DC tho.RaceJudicata wrote:Anyone that tells you preselect is better is at the tip-top of their class.
GULC has like 20% pre-select.Tiago Splitter wrote:I think pure lottery is pretty standard throughout the T-14. I know UVA has some pre-select, anyone know the others that differ?favabeansoup wrote: Pure lottery seems strange to me and seems like it would only work at HYS not other schools.
This is not a matter of school choice. Employers aren't going to come to lesser schools (in terms of rankings) to get stuck with students selected via lottery. They are only going to take the top students at T1 and lower schools. Therefore, they are going to want pre-select to weed out the bottom 80% of the class...or more.Dr. Nefario wrote:So is it uncommon for T1 schools to change away from the lottery and steer towards purely pre-select/no ranking of bids?
Top third at GULC. Most schools aren't GULC. Many firms attending pre-select schools have firm Top 10%/5% cut offs.Glasseyes wrote:FYI, GULC is 70% lottery, 30% preselect. It used to be pure lottery but changed a couple years back. The current system works well to ensure the top of the class gets what they want while everyone else gets a reasonable shot (as long as you're median or close). For what it's worth, plenty of people within the top third get preselects too (myself included), so it's not just the cream creaming on the creme.
Oh for sure. Just clarifying the specifics (someone mentioned GULC above) and what it means to have a split lottery/preselect system. I realize it's not particularly relevant to anyone outside of GULC, but there's a misconception that the preselects only go to the top 5-10% at our school and that's not how it tends to play out.RaceJudicata wrote:Top third at GULC. Most schools aren't GULC. Many firms attending pre-select schools have firm Top 10%/5% cut offs.Glasseyes wrote:FYI, GULC is 70% lottery, 30% preselect. It used to be pure lottery but changed a couple years back. The current system works well to ensure the top of the class gets what they want while everyone else gets a reasonable shot (as long as you're median or close). For what it's worth, plenty of people within the top third get preselects too (myself included), so it's not just the cream creaming on the creme.
Oh gotcha gotcha. Yeah.. I admittedly don't know much about split systems. My experience was with a straight pre-select system.Glasseyes wrote:Oh for sure. Just clarifying the specifics (someone mentioned GULC above) and what it means to have a split lottery/preselect system. I realize it's not particularly relevant to anyone outside of GULC, but there's a misconception that the preselects only go to the top 5-10% at our school and that's not how it tends to play out.RaceJudicata wrote:Top third at GULC. Most schools aren't GULC. Many firms attending pre-select schools have firm Top 10%/5% cut offs.Glasseyes wrote:FYI, GULC is 70% lottery, 30% preselect. It used to be pure lottery but changed a couple years back. The current system works well to ensure the top of the class gets what they want while everyone else gets a reasonable shot (as long as you're median or close). For what it's worth, plenty of people within the top third get preselects too (myself included), so it's not just the cream creaming on the creme.