Differences between SF/Bay area law firms and other cities?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:03 pm
Hey guys,
I am 1 1L and need some pointers about which region I need to target. Let's set aside the my candidacy in any of the regions.
I am into corporate transactional work (M&A, PE, VC types) at biglaws. This type of corporate work is handled by all biglaws. So, the distinction between biglaw offices in SF and Bay Area is the type of clients? For instance,if you work at a SF office in the emerging companies practice area, your clients will be start-up companies and you will work on a bunch of stuff related to startups' life cycles from IP licensing to M&A?
If you work at a NY office in the same emerging companies sector, what you do would be the same as when working at a SF office in the emerging companies practice area?
How about the Chicago market?
I'd really appreciate if anyone can explain about the practice areas..
Thank you!
I am 1 1L and need some pointers about which region I need to target. Let's set aside the my candidacy in any of the regions.
I am into corporate transactional work (M&A, PE, VC types) at biglaws. This type of corporate work is handled by all biglaws. So, the distinction between biglaw offices in SF and Bay Area is the type of clients? For instance,if you work at a SF office in the emerging companies practice area, your clients will be start-up companies and you will work on a bunch of stuff related to startups' life cycles from IP licensing to M&A?
If you work at a NY office in the same emerging companies sector, what you do would be the same as when working at a SF office in the emerging companies practice area?
How about the Chicago market?
I'd really appreciate if anyone can explain about the practice areas..
Thank you!