Let's talk in-house salaries Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
I haven't seen any L&E-specific in-house practitioners on here. Any L&E in-house counsel willing to provide info (i.e., location, company size, salary, bonus, hours, benefits, etc.)? I am looking into going in-house and would love to have some data points. TIA!
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
Recently moved in-house from biglaw (was at firm for 3 years) - TX.
Energy
Base: $175,000
Bonus (target): $50k
RSU (4 year vesting schedule): $50k
No 401K match and medical/benefits cost is same as it was at firm.
Hours: 8:30-6:00 (sometimes earlier rarely later)
Sometimes work at night to catch up, have not had to work over the weekend yet. Been a good move so far, like all the people I work with.
Energy
Base: $175,000
Bonus (target): $50k
RSU (4 year vesting schedule): $50k
No 401K match and medical/benefits cost is same as it was at firm.
Hours: 8:30-6:00 (sometimes earlier rarely later)
Sometimes work at night to catch up, have not had to work over the weekend yet. Been a good move so far, like all the people I work with.
- smokeylarue
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:55 pm
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
Dude this seems crazy. 275k? This is more than what 3rd year associates make in Biglaw. Won the lottery my friend.Anonymous User wrote:Recently moved in-house from biglaw (was at firm for 3 years) - TX.
Energy
Base: $175,000
Bonus (target): $50k
RSU (4 year vesting schedule): $50k
No 401K match and medical/benefits cost is same as it was at firm.
Hours: 8:30-6:00 (sometimes earlier rarely later)
Sometimes work at night to catch up, have not had to work over the weekend yet. Been a good move so far, like all the people I work with.
-
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:29 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
This is above average for TX O&G, but not that unusual. One Sr associate at my firm got a GC (not AGC) offer. $600K. If you can put up with living in Houston this is your reward. Better than being lower middle class in NYC/Bay Area.smokeylarue wrote:Dude this seems crazy. 275k? This is more than what 3rd year associates make in Biglaw. Won the lottery my friend.Anonymous User wrote:Recently moved in-house from biglaw (was at firm for 3 years) - TX.
Energy
Base: $175,000
Bonus (target): $50k
RSU (4 year vesting schedule): $50k
No 401K match and medical/benefits cost is same as it was at firm.
Hours: 8:30-6:00 (sometimes earlier rarely later)
Sometimes work at night to catch up, have not had to work over the weekend yet. Been a good move so far, like all the people I work with.
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
I've been in-house for 1.5 years, direct from law school.
$160k
<5% Bonus
4% 401k match
Various other benefits (Student loan repayment, stock purchase plan, HSA, etc.)
$160k
<5% Bonus
4% 401k match
Various other benefits (Student loan repayment, stock purchase plan, HSA, etc.)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
I guess its not exactly $275 a year because of the 4 year vest on stock, so at any point when I leave, I give us all the unvested units (which could be a significant amount of money). I agree this was an awesome offer, this was basically put in my lap by a client I had done a ton of work with. I haven't heard of a midlevel getting much more, but it also didn't blow the other offers I had heard of away. Had a couple senior associates get the GC gig in their 8th-9th year at the firm with similar ($600k+ pay range). Reason I took it is hoping I could make the jump to GC somewhere in the next 5-6 years while having a better quality of life. Also, LOL at "if you can put up with living in Houston"Neff wrote:This is above average for TX O&G, but not that unusual. One Sr associate at my firm got a GC (not AGC) offer. $600K. If you can put up with living in Houston this is your reward. Better than being lower middle class in NYC/Bay Area.smokeylarue wrote:Dude this seems crazy. 275k? This is more than what 3rd year associates make in Biglaw. Won the lottery my friend.Anonymous User wrote:Recently moved in-house from biglaw (was at firm for 3 years) - TX.
Energy
Base: $175,000
Bonus (target): $50k
RSU (4 year vesting schedule): $50k
No 401K match and medical/benefits cost is same as it was at firm.
Hours: 8:30-6:00 (sometimes earlier rarely later)
Sometimes work at night to catch up, have not had to work over the weekend yet. Been a good move so far, like all the people I work with.
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
WOW! That's pretty impressive. Is it a transactions role?Anonymous User wrote:I've been in-house for 1.5 years, direct from law school.
$160k
<5% Bonus
4% 401k match
Various other benefits (Student loan repayment, stock purchase plan, HSA, etc.)
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
IP. We also hire into our M&A group and our litigation group directly from law school. Usually 3 or 4 new attorneys per cycle across all of legal.Anonymous User wrote:WOW! That's pretty impressive. Is it a transactions role?Anonymous User wrote:I've been in-house for 1.5 years, direct from law school.
$160k
<5% Bonus
4% 401k match
Various other benefits (Student loan repayment, stock purchase plan, HSA, etc.)
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
Oh my gosh. This sounds like a dream!! I've been at a firm for ~4 years now and I'm so over it. What are your hours like? Any chance you'd be willing to email me info?Anonymous User wrote:IP. We also hire into our M&A group and our litigation group directly from law school. Usually 3 or 4 new attorneys per cycle across all of legal.Anonymous User wrote:WOW! That's pretty impressive. Is it a transactions role?Anonymous User wrote:I've been in-house for 1.5 years, direct from law school.
$160k
<5% Bonus
4% 401k match
Various other benefits (Student loan repayment, stock purchase plan, HSA, etc.)
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
My baseline number of hours per week is in the low 40s. Goes up from there depending on workload. I probably average in the high 40s. 50-55/wk isn't uncommon. I've maybe worked 1 or 2 weeks of 60+ in the past 18 months. By and large, we're not expected to be responsive outside of working hours, but many of us have our email on our phones anyway.Anonymous User wrote: Oh my gosh. This sounds like a dream!! I've been at a firm for ~4 years now and I'm so over it. What are your hours like? Any chance you'd be willing to email me info?
Feel free to shoot me an email at dgoh3ip0elby@opayq.com
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
Media/Entertainment Company
180k base
15% bonus
4.5 years V10 big law
Major Market (CA/NY)
No equity
I'm aware that entertainment generally pays less, but does this seem too low?
180k base
15% bonus
4.5 years V10 big law
Major Market (CA/NY)
No equity
I'm aware that entertainment generally pays less, but does this seem too low?
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
I do L&E and made a move to in-house last year after 6 year as a biglaw L&E associate:Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Aug 24, 2018 12:11 pmI haven't seen any L&E-specific in-house practitioners on here. Any L&E in-house counsel willing to provide info (i.e., location, company size, salary, bonus, hours, benefits, etc.)? I am looking into going in-house and would love to have some data points. TIA!
Media company in major market
$185k base salary
20% target bonus
$7.5k RSU grant every year (each grant vests over 3 years)
6% dollar-for-dollar 401k match
So all-in comp is just over $240k for my first year here. Hours are generally pretty good. I end up working into the evening a few nights a week, but nothing terrible, especially once you have been through biglaw. Weekend work is almost never necessary.
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
If anything that seems high for entertainment IME, so I think you got a good one.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:58 amMedia/Entertainment Company
180k base
15% bonus
4.5 years V10 big law
Major Market (CA/NY)
No equity
I'm aware that entertainment generally pays less, but does this seem too low?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
I have in house gig offering $200k from a major market $300k equity, standard benefits. From the looks at this thread, this seems to be a good catch, unless the info in this thread is outdated.
- canon
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 3:18 pm
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
That is really high. Can I ask what industry? Approx. how many years out? Approximately how much annual revenue?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Feb 13, 2021 8:54 pmI have in house gig offering $200k from a major market $300k equity, standard benefits. From the looks at this thread, this seems to be a good catch, unless the info in this thread is outdated.
Drop me a PM if possible, would love to know why I'm so underpaid.
- Elston Gunn
- Posts: 3820
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:09 pm
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
Do you mean $300k equity vesting over 4 years with a 1 year cliff, or something similar? If so, that’s a nice offer, though not unheard of.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Feb 13, 2021 8:54 pmI have in house gig offering $200k from a major market $300k equity, standard benefits. From the looks at this thread, this seems to be a good catch, unless the info in this thread is outdated.
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
I haven’t gotten those details yet but that’s my assumption. This is a tech start up, annual revenue about 4 billion.Elston Gunn wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 12:03 amDo you mean $300k equity vesting over 4 years with a 1 year cliff, or something similar? If so, that’s a nice offer, though not unheard of.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Feb 13, 2021 8:54 pmI have in house gig offering $200k from a major market $300k equity, standard benefits. From the looks at this thread, this seems to be a good catch, unless the info in this thread is outdated.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Elston Gunn
- Posts: 3820
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:09 pm
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
At a private company I would discount the equity grant a bit (and more so the further you are from going public), but yeah a good offer. Without the complication of the company not being public yet, I believe that is roughly comparable with what you would get from FAANG as a midlevel.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 5:46 pmI haven’t gotten those details yet but that’s my assumption. This is a tech start up, annual revenue about 4 billion.Elston Gunn wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 12:03 amDo you mean $300k equity vesting over 4 years with a 1 year cliff, or something similar? If so, that’s a nice offer, though not unheard of.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Feb 13, 2021 8:54 pmI have in house gig offering $200k from a major market $300k equity, standard benefits. From the looks at this thread, this seems to be a good catch, unless the info in this thread is outdated.
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:34 pm
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
On an expected outcome basis, the equity should definitely be discounted.Elston Gunn wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 10:36 pmAt a private company I would discount the equity grant a bit (and more so the further you are from going public), but yeah a good offer. Without the complication of the company not being public yet, I believe that is roughly comparable with what you would get from FAANG as a midlevel.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 5:46 pmI haven’t gotten those details yet but that’s my assumption. This is a tech start up, annual revenue about 4 billion.Elston Gunn wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 12:03 amDo you mean $300k equity vesting over 4 years with a 1 year cliff, or something similar? If so, that’s a nice offer, though not unheard of.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Feb 13, 2021 8:54 pmI have in house gig offering $200k from a major market $300k equity, standard benefits. From the looks at this thread, this seems to be a good catch, unless the info in this thread is outdated.
That being said, its potentially a lot more lucrative than what you'd get at FAANG. I work with VC backed startups and I have seen a dozen (largely incompetent) in house lawyers make enough money at exit that they don't need to work anymore.
Is it likely? Absolutely not. But its possible.
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
Not sure I'd call a tech company with annual revenues of $4 billion a start up, but ok. Also, with revenues like that, without knowing much more, I'd expect there's a good chance the stock would increase in value if and when the company were to go public.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 5:46 pmI haven’t gotten those details yet but that’s my assumption. This is a tech start up, annual revenue about 4 billion.Elston Gunn wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 12:03 amDo you mean $300k equity vesting over 4 years with a 1 year cliff, or something similar? If so, that’s a nice offer, though not unheard of.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Feb 13, 2021 8:54 pmI have in house gig offering $200k from a major market $300k equity, standard benefits. From the looks at this thread, this seems to be a good catch, unless the info in this thread is outdated.
-
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 1:35 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
Didn't mean to comment anonymously. Also, to clarify, I mean that there's a good chance that the stock would be worth more at that time (in present market conditions, anyway) than what it is valued at now.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 11:52 amNot sure I'd call a tech company with annual revenues of $4 billion a start up, but ok. Also, with revenues like that, without knowing much more, I'd expect there's a good chance the stock would increase in value if and when the company were to go public.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 5:46 pmI haven’t gotten those details yet but that’s my assumption. This is a tech start up, annual revenue about 4 billion.Elston Gunn wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 12:03 amDo you mean $300k equity vesting over 4 years with a 1 year cliff, or something similar? If so, that’s a nice offer, though not unheard of.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Feb 13, 2021 8:54 pmI have in house gig offering $200k from a major market $300k equity, standard benefits. From the looks at this thread, this seems to be a good catch, unless the info in this thread is outdated.
Of course, things could change the other way. But I'd tend to agree with Elston Gunn that the equity valuation is probably discounted a bit.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
Didn't know this thread was here, posted about this job in the legal salaries datapoints thread when I got the offer.
Fortune 50 company in the financial industry
0 years experience, got the offer after spending my 2L summer there.
$115k base
$10k transition bonus
$8200 max performance bonus
Awesome fringe benefits. Very low health insurance premiums (depending on the exact plan, as little as like $110 a month), 9% 401(k) match (auto 3%, then up to additional 6%), 24 days PTO.
Super happy with the opportunity. Definitely not as much money as going firm side but based on my summer there, it'll only be like a 9-6 job probably. Pretty stoked.
Fortune 50 company in the financial industry
0 years experience, got the offer after spending my 2L summer there.
$115k base
$10k transition bonus
$8200 max performance bonus
Awesome fringe benefits. Very low health insurance premiums (depending on the exact plan, as little as like $110 a month), 9% 401(k) match (auto 3%, then up to additional 6%), 24 days PTO.
Super happy with the opportunity. Definitely not as much money as going firm side but based on my summer there, it'll only be like a 9-6 job probably. Pretty stoked.
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
I've been thinking about posting but I think this thread is really difficult to glean meaningful information from.
Recently, my company's stock has done well. My overall comp is going to be attributable mostly to the equity component (about 2/3, in fact a bit more). But like the market, the price fluctuates wildly. It's possible there is a market crash, with a similar tumble in my company's share price, leading my comp to be much lower. In the end, it doesn't seem like the data point is meaningful, because I could never have predicted this would happen and I wouldn't expect in most other circumstances that the results would be similar.
The lesson I'm learning, though, is that for tech companies, you can roll the dice and negotiate for more equity and lower salary, and can end up being a very good move if your company does well.
Recently, my company's stock has done well. My overall comp is going to be attributable mostly to the equity component (about 2/3, in fact a bit more). But like the market, the price fluctuates wildly. It's possible there is a market crash, with a similar tumble in my company's share price, leading my comp to be much lower. In the end, it doesn't seem like the data point is meaningful, because I could never have predicted this would happen and I wouldn't expect in most other circumstances that the results would be similar.
The lesson I'm learning, though, is that for tech companies, you can roll the dice and negotiate for more equity and lower salary, and can end up being a very good move if your company does well.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Wed Feb 17, 2021 2:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Elston Gunn
- Posts: 3820
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:09 pm
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
Yeah have had the same experience. I think for a publicly traded company, it’s pretty reasonable to just treat the equity grant as an annual bonus equivalent to its cash value at the time it’s granted/vesting period though. You can be aware that on average it’s likely to be worth more than that by the time you can sell it, *but* there’s a very real possibility it will be worth much less as well, and so it’s more important to be able to live on the base salary and treat the equity as a bonus.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Feb 17, 2021 12:13 pmI've been about posting but I think this thread is really difficult to glean meaningful information from.
Recently, my company's stock has done well. My overall comp is going to be attributable mostly to the equity component (about 2/3). But like the market, the price fluctuates wildly. It's possible there is a market crash, with a similar tumble in my company's share price, leading my comp to be much lower. In the end, it doesn't seem like the data point is meaningful, because I could never have predicted this would happen and I wouldn't expect in most other circumstances that the results would be similar.
The lesson I'm learning, though, is that for tech companies, you can roll the dice and negotiate for more equity and lower salary, and can end up being a very good move if your company does well.
For an earlier stage private company, it’s a lot riskier of course.
-
- Posts: 428114
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's talk in-house salaries
2014 JDAnonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Aug 24, 2018 12:11 pmI haven't seen any L&E-specific in-house practitioners on here. Any L&E in-house counsel willing to provide info (i.e., location, company size, salary, bonus, hours, benefits, etc.)? I am looking into going in-house and would love to have some data points. TIA!
Global employment counsel for Healthcare/Pharma company in tertiary market
$170k base
$30k bonus (target)
4.5% 401k match
No equity (but eligible for discretionary grant w/ 3 year vest in the future)
Schedule is 9-5ish, no weekend work, very sporadic PM work.
After 6 years in big law, I absolutely love it.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login