Political speech in BigLaw? Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
clickclicknope

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2015 3:13 pm

Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by clickclicknope » Thu Jan 07, 2016 4:42 pm

Has anyone gotten in trouble for writing Letters to the Editor on non-legal related matters, from your private email, without any reference to your firm? Thoughts?

RaceJudicata

Gold
Posts: 1867
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by RaceJudicata » Thu Jan 07, 2016 4:48 pm

Formal trouble? Almost certainly not, unless you reveal some privileged/private information about a firm client or firm matter. But depending on the topic and your firm's relation to the topic, it might not bode well for office politics. i.e. expressing ignorant views, etc.

clickclicknope

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2015 3:13 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by clickclicknope » Thu Jan 07, 2016 4:54 pm

Do you need to ask for permission or should you if it is a political / heated topic? Would it be safer to publish under a pseudonym?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428113
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Jan 07, 2016 4:58 pm

We had a presentation on this subject. It's not the safest thing to do, but if it's not racist/offensive nobody will care. One of the points of this kind of writing is to gain a presence and begin marketing yourself to hopefully one day bring in a few clients. If you're going for a pseudonym then you're removing the potential to do that.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428113
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Jan 07, 2016 5:57 pm

What about academic speech? I.e. Publishing in law journals

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


bh369

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2015 7:21 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by bh369 » Thu Jan 07, 2016 6:42 pm

Anonymous User wrote:What about academic speech? I.e. Publishing in law journals
I'm not sure that "academic speech" means what you think it means.

Mod edit: outed for anon abuse.

Nebby

Diamond
Posts: 31195
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by Nebby » Fri Jan 08, 2016 10:55 am

I can guarantee your thoughts aren't ground breaking enough to be published so this may be a non-issue.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428113
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 08, 2016 12:25 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:What about academic speech? I.e. Publishing in law journals
I'm not sure that "academic speech" means what you think it means.
Thanks for the helpful answer anon.

I'm asking about speech published in academic publications (which I mentioned). I suppose the problem I imagine is writing about your practice area, and taking a position that some current or future client doesn't like.

bh369

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2015 7:21 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by bh369 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 12:52 pm

"Academic speech" doesn't refer to the protection of anything published in an academic journals, it refers to the speech of academics, in their professional capacity as academics (if it means anything). If you're discussing job protection as a BigLaw attorney, then it doesn't matter if you publish something in a law journal, it's not "academic speech", as you are not employed as an academic, and therefore are not afford the protections of the profession.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


BlackAndOrange84

Bronze
Posts: 396
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 12:06 am

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by BlackAndOrange84 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 12:59 pm

Nebby wrote:I can guarantee your thoughts aren't ground breaking enough to be published so this may be a non-issue.
Whereas law profs' thoughts are? From what I've seen, only a handful of articles are meaningful and novel. The remainder make incredibly narrow and usually predictable steps forward from existing literature. If OP has trouble getting posted it'll likely be because he isn't already a professor, doesn't have a track record of publication, or doesn't have a sufficiently prestigious resume.

Edit: And even if all those things are true, if he's able to string together enough semi-coherent sentences with footnotes to legal authorities, he'd have to be braindead to not be able to find some secondary journal somewhere that would publish him.
Last edited by BlackAndOrange84 on Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Br3v

Gold
Posts: 4290
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by Br3v » Fri Jan 08, 2016 1:35 pm

OP, regarding political speech I wouldn't expect you to face any special problems than you would at any other job. Use you're head, and if you plan on taking a public stance you know is in contradiction to what a client or partner believes then proceed accordingly.

bh369 wrote:"Academic speech" doesn't refer to the protection of anything published in an academic journals, it refers to the speech of academics, in their professional capacity as academics (if it means anything). If you're discussing job protection as a BigLaw attorney, then it doesn't matter if you publish something in a law journal, it's not "academic speech", as you are not employed as an academic, and therefore are not afford the protections of the profession.
Bh369, you do realize that outside of a given institution's tenure protections, there is no legal significance to "academic speech" right? As in, there are typically no special protections for "academic speech" as compared to any other type of protected speech. What are you arguing against? The question referred to academic or scholarly speech, and gave no indication that such speech was being labeled as such in order to obtain increased protection, as compared to distinguishing such publications from other types of publications such as Op-Eds.

Where are you getting this absurd definition of academic speech as only pertaining to someone "employed as an academic"?

Your post is neither helpful, nor correct.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428113
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:00 pm

It helps if you have good relationships with partners who share your opinion, and would be prudent to check in with them before publishing. If almost everyone doesn't care (and this will almost always be the case) and a few support you doing it then there's not much risk. Of course, the most important thing is whether your statements are offensive and why they are offensive. If you're coming out against a protected class, and that makes lawyers in that protective class uncomfortable working with you then you're putting everybody in a crappy situation legally and professionally.

PMan99

Bronze
Posts: 349
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:21 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by PMan99 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:04 pm

The general rule of thumb at law firms (and one that can be read from the subtext of posts above) is that it's OK if you're expressing liberal views but not conservative ones.

That said it's far more likely that no one would ever read or know about your comments, either in a law journal or to a newspaper, unless perhaps you explicitly flaunt your status as a lawyer at firm X.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


bh369

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2015 7:21 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by bh369 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:33 pm

Br3v wrote:
Bh369, you do realize that outside of a given institution's tenure protections, there is no legal significance to "academic speech" right? As in, there are typically no special protections for "academic speech" as compared to any other type of protected speech. What are you arguing against? The question referred to academic or scholarly speech, and gave no indication that such speech was being labeled as such in order to obtain increased protection, as compared to distinguishing such publications from other types of publications such as Op-Eds.

Where are you getting this absurd definition of academic speech as only pertaining to someone "employed as an academic"?

Your post is neither helpful, nor correct.
That's what I meant by "if it means anything". My point was that I interpreted the OP's question to be asking if publication in an academic publication conferred a special kind of protection (called "academic speech") against wrongful dismissal. My point was that there is no such category of protected speech, outside of the employment protections afforded to academics viz. the tenure process. Therefore, what we might offhandedly call "academic speech protection" isn't fundamentally concerned with whether something is published in an academic journal, but instead with whether one is employed as an academic, and therefore afforded certain employment protections viz. tenure.

User avatar
AVBucks4239

Silver
Posts: 1095
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:37 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by AVBucks4239 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:07 pm

In for the classic TLS neurotic analysis.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428113
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jan 09, 2016 12:06 am

V-10 associate here. Most firms have policies on this, so you will need to check with your firm. Publication is often subject to firm review and if it's anything else your firm may have a policy covering it. Firms can't have associates going on record anywhere taking views that conflict with firm/client interests if there is any way those views will be linked to the firm as a whole. I get the sense that firms are pretty open to associates publishing and getting their names out, but sometimes seemingly innocent positions can be adverse to firm interests. It's always safest to check.

This isn't different than working for any other company, but given the variety of clients and interests firms work with it can be a little more complex to navigate.

User avatar
Aeon

Silver
Posts: 583
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:46 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by Aeon » Mon Jan 11, 2016 2:39 am

Anonymous User wrote:V-10 associate here. Most firms have policies on this, so you will need to check with your firm. Publication is often subject to firm review and if it's anything else your firm may have a policy covering it. Firms can't have associates going on record anywhere taking views that conflict with firm/client interests if there is any way those views will be linked to the firm as a whole. I get the sense that firms are pretty open to associates publishing and getting their names out, but sometimes seemingly innocent positions can be adverse to firm interests. It's always safest to check.

This isn't different than working for any other company, but given the variety of clients and interests firms work with it can be a little more complex to navigate.
Firm policies on outside publication don't really apply to personal letters to the editor on non-legal matters. Though I suppose if one were concerned, a glance at the firm's manual for associates wouldn't hurt.

I'd be concerned that if the letter were on a controversial topic, it could alienate colleagues or clients or prove embarrassing down the road, especially if a simple Internet search would bring it up. But then that's the case for any publicly expressed political view.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


jd20132013

Silver
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by jd20132013 » Mon Jan 11, 2016 8:26 am

bh369 wrote:"Academic speech" doesn't refer to the protection of anything published in an academic journals, it refers to the speech of academics, in their professional capacity as academics (if it means anything). If you're discussing job protection as a BigLaw attorney, then it doesn't matter if you publish something in a law journal, it's not "academic speech", as you are not employed as an academic, and therefore are not afford the protections of the profession.

And he gave this absurd answer so confidently too.

Danger Zone

Platinum
Posts: 8258
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:36 am

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by Danger Zone » Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:44 am

Aeon wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:V-10 associate here. Most firms have policies on this, so you will need to check with your firm. Publication is often subject to firm review and if it's anything else your firm may have a policy covering it. Firms can't have associates going on record anywhere taking views that conflict with firm/client interests if there is any way those views will be linked to the firm as a whole. I get the sense that firms are pretty open to associates publishing and getting their names out, but sometimes seemingly innocent positions can be adverse to firm interests. It's always safest to check.

This isn't different than working for any other company, but given the variety of clients and interests firms work with it can be a little more complex to navigate.
Firm policies on outside publication don't really apply to personal letters to the editor on non-legal matters. Though I suppose if one were concerned, a glance at the firm's manual for associates wouldn't hurt.

I'd be concerned that if the letter were on a controversial topic, it could alienate colleagues or clients or prove embarrassing down the road, especially if a simple Internet search would bring it up. But then that's the case for any publicly expressed political view.
Uhm not true. My firm's policy almost certainly includes that, and how do you know what every firm's policy looks like
Last edited by Danger Zone on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:49 am

jd20132013 wrote:
bh369 wrote:"Academic speech" doesn't refer to the protection of anything published in an academic journals, it refers to the speech of academics, in their professional capacity as academics (if it means anything). If you're discussing job protection as a BigLaw attorney, then it doesn't matter if you publish something in a law journal, it's not "academic speech", as you are not employed as an academic, and therefore are not afford the protections of the profession.

And he gave this absurd answer so confidently too.
What's absurd about it?

Person1111

Bronze
Posts: 496
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:10 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by Person1111 » Mon Jan 11, 2016 2:32 pm

I work at a Vault firm.

In general, you need to clear a conflicts check if you publish something or make a public statement under your own name. You do not get special protection if you are publishing in an academic journal. In general, the expectation is that people will submit blog posts, articles (in academic and practitioner-focused journals), interviews, TV/radio appearances, etc. to conflicts. But I don't think anyone is submitting TLS posts, Yelp! reviews, FB posts, or the like to conflicts.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by Desert Fox » Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:23 pm

hlsperson1111 wrote:I work at a Vault firm.

In general, you need to clear a conflicts check if you publish something or make a public statement under your own name. You do not get special protection if you are publishing in an academic journal. In general, the expectation is that people will submit blog posts, articles (in academic and practitioner-focused journals), interviews, TV/radio appearances, etc. to conflicts. But I don't think anyone is submitting TLS posts, Yelp! reviews, FB posts, or the like to conflicts.
My firm doesn't have this and in retrospect, it really seems like we should.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by Desert Fox » Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:24 pm

This week, after last months political donations hit the FEC website, my boss called me into his office. Sat me down. Said "this is about your Trump donation." I sat in fear, oh man I'm fucked, he knows.

"It's not big enough. We can't make America great one hat at a time."
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

Danger Zone

Platinum
Posts: 8258
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:36 am

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by Danger Zone » Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:31 pm

Desert Fox wrote:This week, after last months political donations hit the FEC website, my boss called me into his office. Sat me down. Said "this is about your Trump donation." I sat in fear, oh man I'm fucked, he knows.

"It's not big enough. We can't make America great one hat at a time."
Flame, Donald Trump doesn't accept donations because he's SELF MADE
Last edited by Danger Zone on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Br3v

Gold
Posts: 4290
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm

Re: Political speech in BigLaw?

Post by Br3v » Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:28 pm

A. Nony Mouse wrote:
jd20132013 wrote:
bh369 wrote:"Academic speech" doesn't refer to the protection of anything published in an academic journals, it refers to the speech of academics, in their professional capacity as academics (if it means anything). If you're discussing job protection as a BigLaw attorney, then it doesn't matter if you publish something in a law journal, it's not "academic speech", as you are not employed as an academic, and therefore are not afford the protections of the profession.

And he gave this absurd answer so confidently too.
What's absurd about it?
The part that says academic speech is only for people employed as "academics."

Also, before the quoted post, nobody suggested "academic speech" would receive "extra" protection regarding this law firm situation.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”