Leverage and Substantive Work
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 11:12 pm
If an office has more partners than associates, is that a pretty good sign that you're going to get good work?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=253575
Yep. In theory the answer is yes, but sometimes upside-down pyramid-shaped firms can result in partners hoarding work if they're not doing so hot on the business development front.JohannDeMann wrote:depends on the firm.
Anonymous User wrote:In my experience, there is a much stronger correlation between lean staffing and getting substantive work than there is between leverage and getting substantive work. We have a group in my office that is very partner-heavy and does big-ticket cases. It's not a good group for young associates - the cases are big enough to staff a ton of people on, and the partners (and senior associates) gobble up all the fun and interesting work. By contrast, we also have partners who primarily work on smaller matters for more cost-conscious clients. They typically prefer to staff matters with no more than 1-2 associates, and you tend to get very cool work (depositions, brief-writing, etc.) from those cases.
Not only is it a fine question, you'll get a relatively wide variety of answers and give you some insight into workload. FWIW I ask this in every interview.Anonymous User wrote:Yes, "how are your cases typically staffed?" is a fine question.