Page 1 of 1

Kirkland (LA) vs. OMM (LA) - Transactional

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:05 am
by Anonymous User
- LA Native
- CCNMVP
- Current 3L
- 2L SA V50 NYC

Any thoughts on which to pick for transactional/M&A? I know that OMM is an LA powerhouse, but OMM seems like they've lost a lot of partners recently (while losing 9.3% revenue) and Kirkland seems to be growing heavily on the West Coast. The people I met at Kirkland were awesome, they have young partners, and local clients.

Would be really grateful if the responders could answer why as well.

Re: Kirkland (LA) vs. OMM (LA) - Transactional

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2015 2:55 pm
by Anonymous User
Bump

Re: Kirkland (LA) vs. OMM (LA) - Transactional

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2015 10:05 am
by Anonymous User
Any written opinions? My offer is expiring this week.

Re: Kirkland (LA) vs. OMM (LA) - Transactional

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2015 1:08 pm
by Anonymous User
The Kirkland people were awesome. I also worked in LA during the summer and was told by a very experienced credible source to avoid OMM at this time. I would definitely choose Kirkland.

Re: Kirkland (LA) vs. OMM (LA) - Transactional

Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 2:15 pm
by Anonymous User
This thread is relevant to my interests.

Re: Kirkland (LA) vs. OMM (LA) - Transactional

Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:16 pm
by Anonymous User
Any thoughts on Satellite (K&E) over Mothership (OMM) Office?