TTTooKewl wrote:JohannDeMann wrote:TTTooKewl wrote:Don't see how OP will get 30.7k anyway he/she slices it. At least one way you slice it, he/she won't.
4 pay periods over June and July = $6667 x 4 = $26,668.
Add in prorate for May: 6/31 = 19.3%; .193 * $6667*2 = $2573. $26668 + $2573 = $29241
your paycheck doesn't change month to month based on number of days. you are prorating in a really weird/arbitrary way here. 10/52 = x/160k; solve for X.
I admit I don't know how the firm would prorate. But it doesn't make sense to prorate by week. OP isn't being paid weekly or bi-weekly. OP is being paid by the month, with two pay checks per month. Unless what the firm means by "semi-monthly" is every two weeks -- in which case, OP would be making $6667 every 2 weeks, which would total more than 30.7k.
You're being paid monthly, but your salary is a weekly salary. For accounting purposes you are being paid at the same time as normal attorneys. Your weekly salary should be $160,000/52 (or whatever the 1st year rate is - this might be adjusted slightly...some firms round up and some round down). Multiply that weekly number by the number of weeks you are working (might not actually be 10 on the dot).
So if you're working "10" weeks, starting May 26 with your first paycheck on June 15th and your last day and last paycheck being July 31, your paychecks should be as follows (note that May 26 through July 31 is not 10 weeks, but actually 9 weeks and 4 days).
May 26-June 15 (paid June 15): 6666.67 + (3080)*(# of weeks worked in May, can be fractional); if 4/5ths a week in May, this will be 9,130.67
June 16-30 (paid June 30): 6666.67
July 1-15 (paid July 15): 6666.67
July 16-31 (paid July 31): 6666.67
This is a total of $29,130.68. This is short $1,053.32 from straight multiplying 9.8*3,080, but that can likely be accounted by using sort of pro-ration. Also, this would be fixed entirely if the firm pays for the previous weeks but not the current week when paying for 15 days. This would mean you will have an additional paycheck on August 15 which would capture any amount not paid in the first 4 paychecks.
-----
Another example: 12 week program starting May 11, first paycheck on May 29:
May 11-29 (paid May 29): 6666.67 + 3080*1.00 = 9,746.67
June 1-15 (paid June 15): 6666.67
June 16-30 (paid June 30): 6666.67
July 1-15 (paid July 15): 6666.67
July 16-31 (paid July 31): 6666.67
Total = $36,413. Still short $547, but that can likely be accounted by using sort of pro-ration. Also, this would be fixed entirely if the firm pays for the previous weeks but not the current week when paying for 15 days. This would mean you will have an additional paycheck on August 15 which would capture any amount not paid in the first 5 paychecks.
------
The error and difference between the monthly paychecks and the weekly amounts totaled up is because dividing $160 by 52 and totaling up 10 weeks is more accurate than dividing by 12 months and totaling two months and a few weeks. The division by 12 months does not account for the fact that some months are longer and shorter than others, and later adding up values on the number of weeks worked will not yield the same value as if you had divided by weeks in the first place. For the same reason, the # of days worked will provide the most accurate salary projection ($3080/7=daily salary). Using 365.25 would also change things, but would only provide completely accurate numbers if valuing over a 4 year period.
If you don't believe me, divide 365 by 52 and multiply the resulting value by 10 (the equivalent of a 10 week summer). (Hint, the answer is 70.192).
Then take 365, divide by 12, and multiply by (2+X*12/365), where X is the number of days worked in the non-full month. The numbers will not be the same. (Hint, for 4 days worked in May, this would be 64.833; a difference of 5.359 from the weekly answer).
The difference between the two methods becomes smaller as the time worked grows larger until you reach a full year, where the values will be equal.