Jones Day opens office in Detroit
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:22 pm
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=244901
no.Detroit has always been and will continue to be one of the great cities of the United States...
Its the 14th largest metro area in the country (bigger than Seattle). It is the home of the US auto industry, which while declining in importance, is still a huge industry. Its the busiest trade crossing point in North America, and its hard to see how that could ever change. And while the city itself is a mess, the metro has a fairly large population of affluent, educated people. I wouldn't write it off that quickly.reasonable person wrote:no.Detroit has always been and will continue to be one of the great cities of the United States...
It will never be the major city it once was (almost 2M people in 1950), but still has potential for some of the reasons you listed. Its downtown is improving, and there are developing areas like Midtown, however it will take generations to restore the neighborhoods and blight.Nomo wrote:Its the 14th largest metro area in the country (bigger than Seattle). It is the home of the US auto industry, which while declining in importance, is still a huge industry. Its the busiest trade crossing point in North America, and its hard to see how that could ever change. And while the city itself is a mess, the metro has a fairly large population of affluent, educated people. I wouldn't write it off that quickly.reasonable person wrote:no.Detroit has always been and will continue to be one of the great cities of the United States...
I figured it was so they could lower their costs while they kept raking in huge fees from taxpayers after being appointed by one of their own partners.jbiresq wrote:Is this so they keep raking in huge fees from taxpayers after being appointed by one of their own partners?
^^Cruising for libel lawsuits from KO and JD: http://abovethelaw.com/2014/06/biglaw-f ... hissy-fit/Jason Taverner wrote:I figured it was so they could lower their costs while they kept raking in huge fees from taxpayers after being appointed by one of their own partners.jbiresq wrote:Is this so they keep raking in huge fees from taxpayers after being appointed by one of their own partners?
Did you read the link you posted?Anonymous User wrote:^^Cruising for libel lawsuits from KO and JD: http://abovethelaw.com/2014/06/biglaw-f ... hissy-fit/Jason Taverner wrote:I figured it was so they could lower their costs while they kept raking in huge fees from taxpayers after being appointed by one of their own partners.jbiresq wrote:Is this so they keep raking in huge fees from taxpayers after being appointed by one of their own partners?
He didn't write it off. He took issue with saying it's a "great city," because it's not. It has some potential and was once quite impressive, but the city proper is a shit hole right now.Nomo wrote:Its the 14th largest metro area in the country (bigger than Seattle). It is the home of the US auto industry, which while declining in importance, is still a huge industry. Its the busiest trade crossing point in North America, and its hard to see how that could ever change. And while the city itself is a mess, the metro has a fairly large population of affluent, educated people. I wouldn't write it off that quickly.reasonable person wrote:no.Detroit has always been and will continue to be one of the great cities of the United States...
I think when most people refer to Detroit they are referring to more than the city proper. The Detroit Pistons don't play in Detroit, but they are still the Detroit Pistons.BeenDidThat wrote:He didn't write it off. He took issue with saying it's a "great city," because it's not. It has some potential and was once quite impressive, but the city proper is a shit hole right now.Nomo wrote:Its the 14th largest metro area in the country (bigger than Seattle). It is the home of the US auto industry, which while declining in importance, is still a huge industry. Its the busiest trade crossing point in North America, and its hard to see how that could ever change. And while the city itself is a mess, the metro has a fairly large population of affluent, educated people. I wouldn't write it off that quickly.reasonable person wrote:no.Detroit has always been and will continue to be one of the great cities of the United States...
The real estate market there proves it. People are selling houses for a few thousand dollars (or less); demand for real estate is abysmal. Given the hilariously bubbilicious real estate situation in the U.S., prices that low are proof positive that anybody with something to lose (like $) doesn't want to touch Detroit.
From what i would expect it would be located in the City Center/Downtown area. Which, much to what you probably know is actually nice and unfortunately getting expensive - a lot of the rents in the downtown area are starting to reach Chicago prices - but still has a way to go.XxSpyKEx wrote:Is the office actually going to be located in the city of Detroit? Detroit is an epic shithole, and, if it is going to be located in the city of Detroit, that kind of sucks for anyone who winds up working out of that office... Especially given the fact that Jones Day will be the only truly national law firm in the Detroit metro area (AFAIK).
for blighted houses, sure the prices are through the floor - but houses are still selling in Detroit Proper (not Grosse Pointe, Bloomfield, etc) for over 750k+ - some apartments on the riverfront are listed for 450k+ and selling quick -As a budding lawyer you should make sure to check your facts.BeenDidThat wrote:He didn't write it off. He took issue with saying it's a "great city," because it's not. It has some potential and was once quite impressive, but the city proper is a shit hole right now.Nomo wrote:Its the 14th largest metro area in the country (bigger than Seattle). It is the home of the US auto industry, which while declining in importance, is still a huge industry. Its the busiest trade crossing point in North America, and its hard to see how that could ever change. And while the city itself is a mess, the metro has a fairly large population of affluent, educated people. I wouldn't write it off that quickly.reasonable person wrote:no.Detroit has always been and will continue to be one of the great cities of the United States...
The real estate market there proves it. People are selling houses for a few thousand dollars (or less); demand for real estate is abysmal. Given the hilariously bubbilicious real estate situation in the U.S., prices that low are proof positive that anybody with something to lose (like $) doesn't want to touch Detroit.
I was actually in Detroit last month (unfortunately). The rent is up there for super nice downtown Detroit apartments (but still cheaper than the same properties in Chicago), but the area is pretty epically horrendous. I mean it's a straight up ghost town (especially after 5pm or 6pm), and everything is very, very run down, relative to other major cities like Chicago. Spend a day in downtown Chicago, NYC, etc., and then spend a day in Detroit. There's a pretty big difference. I'm not trying to bash on anyone's hometown, so don't take it personally, but Detroit is objectively shitty relative to other major cities.Anonymous User wrote:From what i would expect it would be located in the City Center/Downtown area. Which, much to what you probably know is actually nice and unfortunately getting expensive - a lot of the rents in the downtown area are starting to reach Chicago prices - but still has a way to go.XxSpyKEx wrote:Is the office actually going to be located in the city of Detroit? Detroit is an epic shithole, and, if it is going to be located in the city of Detroit, that kind of sucks for anyone who winds up working out of that office... Especially given the fact that Jones Day will be the only truly national law firm in the Detroit metro area (AFAIK).
Foley and Lardner has had an office in Detroit for about 10 years. Otherwise the midsize regional firms are it - ClarkHill, Dykema, and DW might claim national but it's not to the same degree as JD or Foley. When JD comes they'd clearly become the top, then Foley, then Honigman, etc.
In all fairness, for every one of those $750k houses in Detroit, there are at least 100 "blighted houses" that Detroit will pay you to take. And, frankly, I don't think the downtown/midtown areas of Detroit are very nice, despite what people say. Spend a day in downtown Chicago, NYC, etc., and then spend a day in Detroit. There's a pretty big difference. Detroit is a very rough area, which is why most people don't actually live in Detroit (it's pretty much a ghost town after 5 or 6pm).Anonymous User wrote:for blighted houses, sure the prices are through the floor - but houses are still selling in Detroit Proper (not Grosse Pointe, Bloomfield, etc) for over 750k+ - some apartments on the riverfront are listed for 450k+ and selling quick -As a budding lawyer you should make sure to check your facts.BeenDidThat wrote:He didn't write it off. He took issue with saying it's a "great city," because it's not. It has some potential and was once quite impressive, but the city proper is a shit hole right now.Nomo wrote:Its the 14th largest metro area in the country (bigger than Seattle). It is the home of the US auto industry, which while declining in importance, is still a huge industry. Its the busiest trade crossing point in North America, and its hard to see how that could ever change. And while the city itself is a mess, the metro has a fairly large population of affluent, educated people. I wouldn't write it off that quickly.reasonable person wrote:
no.
The real estate market there proves it. People are selling houses for a few thousand dollars (or less); demand for real estate is abysmal. Given the hilariously bubbilicious real estate situation in the U.S., prices that low are proof positive that anybody with something to lose (like $) doesn't want to touch Detroit.
Some of the Detroit suburbs are exceptionally nice. And relative to most of the country, they are really cheap (you're talking about what would probably be $100 million+ dollar houses in NYC going for around a million or two in the Detroit suburbs). The negative is that you're still in a suburb and there's no real city anywhere around. Not bad if you're older and have kids or something like that though.krads153 wrote:Interesting. Maybe rent is dirt cheap in Detroit proper? Gotta say - Detroit proper is kind of crappy, but there are parts around it (Grosse Ile Township, etc.) that are expensive and really nice and have a ton of rich auto execs. Some of the richest places in the country (highest income per capita) are in Michigan.
Maybe I'm unusual, but I didn't like Chicago at all when I visited...
Yeah, I dunno. I'd take suburbs right now over NYC. I work too much to do anything in NYC and everything is SUPER DUPER expensive. I think I'm literally throwing away money for no reason. There's no point in a living in a big city when you never have the time to do anything. I think I'd only feel like it was worth staying in NYC if I saved up $10 million and had investment income so I didn't have to work.XxSpyKEx wrote:Some of the Detroit suburbs are exceptionally nice. And relative to most of the country, they are really cheap (you're talking about what would probably be $100 million+ dollar houses in NYC going for around a million or two in the Detroit suburbs). The negative is that you're still in a suburb and there's no real city anywhere around. Not bad if you're older and have kids or something like that though.krads153 wrote:Interesting. Maybe rent is dirt cheap in Detroit proper? Gotta say - Detroit proper is kind of crappy, but there are parts around it (Grosse Ile Township, etc.) that are expensive and really nice and have a ton of rich auto execs. Some of the richest places in the country (highest income per capita) are in Michigan.
Maybe I'm unusual, but I didn't like Chicago at all when I visited...
But you could RIOT!!Desert Fox wrote:My firm has two Baltimore offices. lol. I used to think about transferring for dat savings. But I don't wanna have to buy a street sweeper.
Problem is Detroit salaries are so much lower. I'm sure it's awesome if you can get NYC market in Detroit, but pretty much all major firms in Detroit pay a lot less. It still works out really well relative to living in NYC. But I think the best balance anywhere is Texas (Dallas/Houston), assuming you don't really care about being in NYC (I don't). Think cost of living is actually cheaper in TX than it is in Detroit, and you at least get somewhat of a city (albeit, there's not much in Dallas--haven't been to Houston). Not to mention no state income tax means you're already taking home like another $10k /year relative to NYC. But you need ties to TX to get there (similar to Detroit).krads153 wrote:Yeah, I dunno. I'd take suburbs right now over NYC. I work too much to do anything in NYC and everything is SUPER DUPER expensive. I think I'm literally throwing away money for no reason. There's no point in a living in a big city when you never have the time to do anything. I think I'd only feel like it was worth staying in NYC if I saved up $10 million and had investment income so I didn't have to work.XxSpyKEx wrote:Some of the Detroit suburbs are exceptionally nice. And relative to most of the country, they are really cheap (you're talking about what would probably be $100 million+ dollar houses in NYC going for around a million or two in the Detroit suburbs). The negative is that you're still in a suburb and there's no real city anywhere around. Not bad if you're older and have kids or something like that though.krads153 wrote:Interesting. Maybe rent is dirt cheap in Detroit proper? Gotta say - Detroit proper is kind of crappy, but there are parts around it (Grosse Ile Township, etc.) that are expensive and really nice and have a ton of rich auto execs. Some of the richest places in the country (highest income per capita) are in Michigan.
Maybe I'm unusual, but I didn't like Chicago at all when I visited...