LOL no. I'm not sure where you heard that. There are a number of in house positions that pay between 150 to 250k in NYC and other cities, but hours (although better than biglaw) are not 9 to 5. Some places like Amazon work you harder than biglaw. I know a few people who left in house to go back to biglaw because the hours were worse in house.Anonymous User wrote:Isn't it the case that there are in-house positions that pay ~500k all in after a few years? I'm thinking of large banks/certain f500s? Would you all say that those positions are the balance between work/life and money?
110 hour week Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- BiglawAssociate
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 12:05 am
Re: 110 hour week
-
- Posts: 428115
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 110 hour week
Yeah, this is about right. I work with a few clients whose GCs make more than 400k, but they're also working/traveling literally nonstop. I don't think I would work as much as they do even for that kind of money, it seems miserable.BiglawAssociate wrote:LOL no. I'm not sure where you heard that. There are a number of in house positions that pay between 150 to 250k in NYC and other cities, but hours (although better than biglaw) are not 9 to 5. Some places like Amazon work you harder than biglaw. I know a few people who left in house to go back to biglaw because the hours were worse in house.Anonymous User wrote:Isn't it the case that there are in-house positions that pay ~500k all in after a few years? I'm thinking of large banks/certain f500s? Would you all say that those positions are the balance between work/life and money?
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: 110 hour week
I can't say I know a few such people, but I personally know one. And I know a couple of others who are thinking about trying to get out of their sweatshop in-house jobs. I think many TLS'ers have a heavily fictionalized perception of the realities of an in-house lawyer. Some of those positions suck.BiglawAssociate wrote:LOL no. I'm not sure where you heard that. There are a number of in house positions that pay between 150 to 250k in NYC and other cities, but hours (although better than biglaw) are not 9 to 5. Some places like Amazon work you harder than biglaw. I know a few people who left in house to go back to biglaw because the hours were worse in house.Anonymous User wrote:Isn't it the case that there are in-house positions that pay ~500k all in after a few years? I'm thinking of large banks/certain f500s? Would you all say that those positions are the balance between work/life and money?
-
- Posts: 428115
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 110 hour week
^^^
I think we have a tendency to view in-house jobs as the "light at the end of the tunnel" since biglaw life is so poor. We just assume the grass will get greener once we get a few years experience and can make the in-house flip. But I'm starting to think thats not really the case as often as we may like to think. The bottom line is that you damn well better love your practice area/substantive area of expertise, because practice itself doesn't appear to get any less stressful or any easier as you move along.
I think we have a tendency to view in-house jobs as the "light at the end of the tunnel" since biglaw life is so poor. We just assume the grass will get greener once we get a few years experience and can make the in-house flip. But I'm starting to think thats not really the case as often as we may like to think. The bottom line is that you damn well better love your practice area/substantive area of expertise, because practice itself doesn't appear to get any less stressful or any easier as you move along.
-
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: 110 hour week
Well, the "bottom line" is that jobs that pay $200k+ but don't expect a hell of a lot of work are unicorn jobs.
You can own a company, you can have lucky investments, you can find a needle in a haystack, but this is Economics 101: There are a lot of talented people who are willing to work 60 hours a week for $200k salary. That means you, as a lawyer, all all but certainly fungible. This applies to almost every non-lawyer job, too, where a person doesn't have an ownership interest in the company.
Any light at the end of the tunnel is just agreeing to work fewer hours and provide a modicum of expertise for less pay. That's the shitty thing about the light. It's not actually any brighter as you get close. It's more like you're climbing up a mountain toward a light as people behind you yell at you and whip you, and as you get close, the light (pay) gets dimmer, but in turn the people with whips allow you to climb slower with fewer lashings.
You eventually kind of half-ass climb your way to the top, your family and friends long since deserted, and lie not victorious but pathetic, old, drunk, and fading away on your death bed with fleeting thoughts of all the fun shit that the dude from high school who was a pretty good welder in tenth grade did in his life.
You can own a company, you can have lucky investments, you can find a needle in a haystack, but this is Economics 101: There are a lot of talented people who are willing to work 60 hours a week for $200k salary. That means you, as a lawyer, all all but certainly fungible. This applies to almost every non-lawyer job, too, where a person doesn't have an ownership interest in the company.
Any light at the end of the tunnel is just agreeing to work fewer hours and provide a modicum of expertise for less pay. That's the shitty thing about the light. It's not actually any brighter as you get close. It's more like you're climbing up a mountain toward a light as people behind you yell at you and whip you, and as you get close, the light (pay) gets dimmer, but in turn the people with whips allow you to climb slower with fewer lashings.
You eventually kind of half-ass climb your way to the top, your family and friends long since deserted, and lie not victorious but pathetic, old, drunk, and fading away on your death bed with fleeting thoughts of all the fun shit that the dude from high school who was a pretty good welder in tenth grade did in his life.
Anonymous User wrote:^^^
I think we have a tendency to view in-house jobs as the "light at the end of the tunnel" since biglaw life is so poor. We just assume the grass will get greener once we get a few years experience and can make the in-house flip. But I'm starting to think thats not really the case as often as we may like to think. The bottom line is that you damn well better love your practice area/substantive area of expertise, because practice itself doesn't appear to get any less stressful or any easier as you move along.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8058
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:47 pm
Re: 110 hour week
So TCR is get equity in a seed stage startup. Combine ownership with slave labor. Got it.
Last edited by FSK on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:34 pm
Re: 110 hour week
There have been a number of times people have said this on this thread, but this may be the most depressing thing I have ever seen on TLS.smallfirmassociate wrote:Well, the "bottom line" is that jobs that pay $200k+ but don't expect a hell of a lot of work are unicorn jobs.
You can own a company, you can have lucky investments, you can find a needle in a haystack, but this is Economics 101: There are a lot of talented people who are willing to work 60 hours a week for $200k salary. That means you, as a lawyer, all all but certainly fungible. This applies to almost every non-lawyer job, too, where a person doesn't have an ownership interest in the company.
Any light at the end of the tunnel is just agreeing to work fewer hours and provide a modicum of expertise for less pay. That's the shitty thing about the light. It's not actually any brighter as you get close. It's more like you're climbing up a mountain toward a light as people behind you yell at you and whip you, and as you get close, the light (pay) gets dimmer, but in turn the people with whips allow you to climb slower with fewer lashings.
You eventually kind of half-ass climb your way to the top, your family and friends long since deserted, and lie not victorious but pathetic, old, drunk, and fading away on your death bed with fleeting thoughts of all the fun shit that the dude from high school who was a pretty good welder in tenth grade did in his life.
Anonymous User wrote:^^^
I think we have a tendency to view in-house jobs as the "light at the end of the tunnel" since biglaw life is so poor. We just assume the grass will get greener once we get a few years experience and can make the in-house flip. But I'm starting to think thats not really the case as often as we may like to think. The bottom line is that you damn well better love your practice area/substantive area of expertise, because practice itself doesn't appear to get any less stressful or any easier as you move along.
- DELG
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: 110 hour week
i dunno. both my husband and i are at firms. we don't see each other or our kid enough but at the end of the day we all still love each other and enjoy the time we do have.
-
- Posts: 428115
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 110 hour week
And thats precisely the reason I want to find some more balance, even if it means resigning myself to a far lower standard of living than what biglaw would provide. Its precisely because there are people I love that I don't see enough. Of course I enjoy the time we spend together, and of course I love them to death. And thats exactly why I couldn't live with not seeing them enough.DELG wrote:i dunno. both my husband and i are at firms. we don't see each other or our kid enough but at the end of the day we all still love each other and enjoy the time we do have.
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: 110 hour week
Also, working biglaw with a spouse that works biglaw is a lot easier because they understand. Your kid is too young to know the difference between nanny and mommy or really appreciate the difference at this time. The point your making is easy to make as an under 30 year old, but a career in biglaw will stress the hell out of this situation becuase your 6 year old kid will not understand why you miss little league or dance recitals, broken promises, why you don't cook meals for them etc. Your 18 year old will wonder why their parents with millions in the bank work instead of watching a show with them. There's a reason why partners have divorced 2+ times by the age of 55. And considering the biggest stressor in most relationships is financial concerns, which this doesn't fit in - you better believe it wrecks the hell out of a home life.Anonymous User wrote:And thats precisely the reason I want to find some more balance, even if it means resigning myself to a far lower standard of living than what biglaw would provide. Its precisely because there are people I love that I don't see enough. Of course I enjoy the time we spend together, and of course I love them to death. And thats exactly why I couldn't live with not seeing them enough.DELG wrote:i dunno. both my husband and i are at firms. we don't see each other or our kid enough but at the end of the day we all still love each other and enjoy the time we do have.
- DELG
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: 110 hour week
I mean... I am like 3 hours a week away from totally chill with it. Just me.Anonymous User wrote:And thats precisely the reason I want to find some more balance, even if it means resigning myself to a far lower standard of living than what biglaw would provide. Its precisely because there are people I love that I don't see enough. Of course I enjoy the time we spend together, and of course I love them to death. And thats exactly why I couldn't live with not seeing them enough.DELG wrote:i dunno. both my husband and i are at firms. we don't see each other or our kid enough but at the end of the day we all still love each other and enjoy the time we do have.
-
- Posts: 428115
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 110 hour week
My situation is different in that my wife works "normal person hours". Its good since she has time to unwind and relax, have an evening, take care of our kid, etc. But it sucks since she has to do this all alone. I hate knowing that she is eating dinner alone yet again, going to sleep alone, etc. And I know the day will come when our kid hits some milestone moment(s) and I won't be there for it. And all of that is what hurts me so much. It would almost be easier if she were going through the same thing, and equally absent, but thats selfish of me to even think.DELG wrote:I mean... I am like 3 hours a week away from totally chill with it. Just me.Anonymous User wrote:And thats precisely the reason I want to find some more balance, even if it means resigning myself to a far lower standard of living than what biglaw would provide. Its precisely because there are people I love that I don't see enough. Of course I enjoy the time we spend together, and of course I love them to death. And thats exactly why I couldn't live with not seeing them enough.DELG wrote:i dunno. both my husband and i are at firms. we don't see each other or our kid enough but at the end of the day we all still love each other and enjoy the time we do have.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BiglawAssociate
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 12:05 am
Re: 110 hour week
It's not just about spending time with family, etc. It's about SPENDING TIME DOING OTHER SHIT BESIDES WORK. Unlike many lawyers, I actually have outside hobbies and interests and talents. LOL at some lawyers. I hear single coworkers say this shit all the time - "Oh well, what else would I be doing if I weren't working? Nothing." LOL if you can't even think of one thing to do besides work. WTF is wrong with you. This is probably why you are 35 and unmarried - you have no fucking personality.
-
- Posts: 428115
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 110 hour week
Agreed. Family is just the first thing that comes to mind. But having some more time for the gym, to watch my favorite sports teams, to go hiking, etc. would all be invaluable and allow me to feel like I'm actually living life to some extent, as opposed to needlessly wasting away my existence in my office from beginning of the day until late at night each night.BiglawAssociate wrote:It's not just about spending time with family, etc. It's about SPENDING TIME DOING OTHER SHIT BESIDES WORK. Unlike many lawyers, I actually have outside hobbies and interests and talents. LOL at some lawyers. I hear single coworkers say this shit all the time - "Oh well, what else would I be doing if I weren't working? Nothing." LOL if you can't even think of one thing to do besides work. WTF is wrong with you. This is probably why you are 35 and unmarried - you have no fucking personality.
- BarbellDreams
- Posts: 2251
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:10 pm
Re: 110 hour week
Everyone defines "enough" differently. I think I would be perfectly fine working 60 hours a week for the rest of my life if my salary was substantial and allowed my family to enjoy a good lifestyle. You pull n 8-7 Mon-Fri, do a half day on Sat and relax for the remainder of the weekend. Still get dinner at home, still spend some time with family, still have time for the gym and some activities, etc.. At 70+ hours I would GTFO if I had kids. Give me a 50% paycut if need be, I'm not dealing with a schedule where I leave before my wife wakes up and come home after she is fast asleep, let alone the kids.DELG wrote:i dunno. both my husband and i are at firms. we don't see each other or our kid enough but at the end of the day we all still love each other and enjoy the time we do have.
- El Pollito
- Posts: 20139
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: 110 hour week
lol at controlling when those 60 hours occurBarbellDreams wrote:Everyone defines "enough" differently. I think I would be perfectly fine working 60 hours a week for the rest of my life if my salary was substantial and allowed my family to enjoy a good lifestyle. You pull n 8-7 Mon-Fri, do a half day on Sat and relax for the remainder of the weekend. Still get dinner at home, still spend some time with family, still have time for the gym and some activities, etc.. At 70+ hours I would GTFO if I had kids. Give me a 50% paycut if need be, I'm not dealing with a schedule where I leave before my wife wakes up and come home after she is fast asleep, let alone the kids.DELG wrote:i dunno. both my husband and i are at firms. we don't see each other or our kid enough but at the end of the day we all still love each other and enjoy the time we do have.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428115
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 110 hour week
I could take this as well, but its crazy to think that law works this way. We all know how emails come at 5:30 PM which ruin our nights, even if the day was slow, or how comments/edits come in at the worst times, even when you thought the project was done and finalized. Or how one thing can suddenly balloon up to the point where you are forced to be there later. Sure, if it all just ended for the day at 7, that would be incredible. But we all know that doesn't happen. At least not in biglaw.BarbellDreams wrote:Everyone defines "enough" differently. I think I would be perfectly fine working 60 hours a week for the rest of my life if my salary was substantial and allowed my family to enjoy a good lifestyle. You pull n 8-7 Mon-Fri, do a half day on Sat and relax for the remainder of the weekend. Still get dinner at home, still spend some time with family, still have time for the gym and some activities, etc.. At 70+ hours I would GTFO if I had kids. Give me a 50% paycut if need be, I'm not dealing with a schedule where I leave before my wife wakes up and come home after she is fast asleep, let alone the kids.DELG wrote:i dunno. both my husband and i are at firms. we don't see each other or our kid enough but at the end of the day we all still love each other and enjoy the time we do have.
- BarbellDreams
- Posts: 2251
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:10 pm
Re: 110 hour week
Thats my point. Thats why, IMO, biglaw will never lead to a healthy and happy lifestyle. You can bill 40 hours in a week but it will end up needing something from 8 am to 10 am, then sitting around scrambling to find work from 10 am to 5 pm, and then getting bombarded with emails until 10 pm. On the billing sheet, which is all anyone (except you) cares about, it looks like you only worked like 9 hours that day. In your head that was the worst day ever. Unless you got extremely lucky with a practice group or office, this happens a lot from what I can tell. Its just not a normal lifestyle IMO and it doesn't lead to seeing my family "enough" per my own defintion of "enough".El Pollito wrote:lol at controlling when those 60 hours occurBarbellDreams wrote:Everyone defines "enough" differently. I think I would be perfectly fine working 60 hours a week for the rest of my life if my salary was substantial and allowed my family to enjoy a good lifestyle. You pull n 8-7 Mon-Fri, do a half day on Sat and relax for the remainder of the weekend. Still get dinner at home, still spend some time with family, still have time for the gym and some activities, etc.. At 70+ hours I would GTFO if I had kids. Give me a 50% paycut if need be, I'm not dealing with a schedule where I leave before my wife wakes up and come home after she is fast asleep, let alone the kids.DELG wrote:i dunno. both my husband and i are at firms. we don't see each other or our kid enough but at the end of the day we all still love each other and enjoy the time we do have.
- BiglawAssociate
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 12:05 am
Re: 110 hour week
If we're counting "work hours" like non-lawyers do, we probably work on average 12 to 18 hours a day....BarbellDreams wrote:Thats my point. Thats why, IMO, biglaw will never lead to a healthy and happy lifestyle. You can bill 40 hours in a week but it will end up needing something from 8 am to 10 am, then sitting around scrambling to find work from 10 am to 5 pm, and then getting bombarded with emails until 10 pm. On the billing sheet, which is all anyone (except you) cares about, it looks like you only worked like 9 hours that day. In your head that was the worst day ever. Unless you got extremely lucky with a practice group or office, this happens a lot from what I can tell. Its just not a normal lifestyle IMO and it doesn't lead to seeing my family "enough" per my own defintion of "enough".El Pollito wrote:lol at controlling when those 60 hours occurBarbellDreams wrote:Everyone defines "enough" differently. I think I would be perfectly fine working 60 hours a week for the rest of my life if my salary was substantial and allowed my family to enjoy a good lifestyle. You pull n 8-7 Mon-Fri, do a half day on Sat and relax for the remainder of the weekend. Still get dinner at home, still spend some time with family, still have time for the gym and some activities, etc.. At 70+ hours I would GTFO if I had kids. Give me a 50% paycut if need be, I'm not dealing with a schedule where I leave before my wife wakes up and come home after she is fast asleep, let alone the kids.DELG wrote:i dunno. both my husband and i are at firms. we don't see each other or our kid enough but at the end of the day we all still love each other and enjoy the time we do have.
- DELG
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: 110 hour week
The thing that I hate about my schedule is that sometimes I leave before my kid is awake, then come home after she's asleep, then the same thing happens the next day. That's pretty intolerable, even if it happens rarely.BarbellDreams wrote:Everyone defines "enough" differently. I think I would be perfectly fine working 60 hours a week for the rest of my life if my salary was substantial and allowed my family to enjoy a good lifestyle. You pull n 8-7 Mon-Fri, do a half day on Sat and relax for the remainder of the weekend. Still get dinner at home, still spend some time with family, still have time for the gym and some activities, etc.. At 70+ hours I would GTFO if I had kids. Give me a 50% paycut if need be, I'm not dealing with a schedule where I leave before my wife wakes up and come home after she is fast asleep, let alone the kids.DELG wrote:i dunno. both my husband and i are at firms. we don't see each other or our kid enough but at the end of the day we all still love each other and enjoy the time we do have.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428115
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 110 hour week
So then why do it?DELG wrote:The thing that I hate about my schedule is that sometimes I leave before my kid is awake, then come home after she's asleep, then the same thing happens the next day. That's pretty intolerable, even if it happens rarely.BarbellDreams wrote:Everyone defines "enough" differently. I think I would be perfectly fine working 60 hours a week for the rest of my life if my salary was substantial and allowed my family to enjoy a good lifestyle. You pull n 8-7 Mon-Fri, do a half day on Sat and relax for the remainder of the weekend. Still get dinner at home, still spend some time with family, still have time for the gym and some activities, etc.. At 70+ hours I would GTFO if I had kids. Give me a 50% paycut if need be, I'm not dealing with a schedule where I leave before my wife wakes up and come home after she is fast asleep, let alone the kids.DELG wrote:i dunno. both my husband and i are at firms. we don't see each other or our kid enough but at the end of the day we all still love each other and enjoy the time we do have.
- DELG
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: 110 hour week
I don't understand the questionAnonymous User wrote:So then why do it?DELG wrote:The thing that I hate about my schedule is that sometimes I leave before my kid is awake, then come home after she's asleep, then the same thing happens the next day. That's pretty intolerable, even if it happens rarely.BarbellDreams wrote:Everyone defines "enough" differently. I think I would be perfectly fine working 60 hours a week for the rest of my life if my salary was substantial and allowed my family to enjoy a good lifestyle. You pull n 8-7 Mon-Fri, do a half day on Sat and relax for the remainder of the weekend. Still get dinner at home, still spend some time with family, still have time for the gym and some activities, etc.. At 70+ hours I would GTFO if I had kids. Give me a 50% paycut if need be, I'm not dealing with a schedule where I leave before my wife wakes up and come home after she is fast asleep, let alone the kids.DELG wrote:i dunno. both my husband and i are at firms. we don't see each other or our kid enough but at the end of the day we all still love each other and enjoy the time we do have.
-
- Posts: 428115
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 110 hour week
Not sure what the point is in continuing to work in biglaw if it leads you to be in a situation where you have to leave before your kid is awake and then come home after your kid is asleep multiple nights in a row. Unless student loans are literally chaining you to that desk, I just don't see the point, and I know I wouldn't want to be there anymore. But maybe thats just me.
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: 110 hour week
It's not like other, better opportunities grow on trees.Anonymous User wrote:Not sure what the point is in continuing to work in biglaw if it leads you to be in a situation where you have to leave before your kid is awake and then come home after your kid is asleep multiple nights in a row. Unless student loans are literally chaining you to that desk, I just don't see the point, and I know I wouldn't want to be there anymore. But maybe thats just me.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login