1900 hours is hardly coasting. The difference between 1900 and 2200 is never having vacation. That may not matter to you if you're some kind of soulless striver, but most normal people go nuts under such conditions.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Regardless of how much 2100 versus 2000 sucks, it's not like it should be a surprise to Quinn associates that doing less than that means you're failing to meet expectations. I imagine getting a lower bonus is only one of many ways in which the firm tells you to get your shit straight if you aren't doing 2200+. Doesn't sound like a place that abides coasting.
2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- 84651846190
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
- moonman157
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 10:26 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
So like, what is the incentive of Quinn then? They're super grade-selective, so the people that go there have plenty of options (presumably). Is it really just people drinking the kool-aid? I know it's a good firm, especially if you're set on litigation, but I can't imagine it's worth it.
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
Yeah I'm just saying if you go to Quinn and are surprised that the standard is "soulless striver," you weren't paying attention.Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:1900 hours is hardly coasting. The difference between 1900 and 2200 is never having vacation. That may not matter to you if you're some kind of soulless striver, but most normal people go nuts under such conditions.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Regardless of how much 2100 versus 2000 sucks, it's not like it should be a surprise to Quinn associates that doing less than that means you're failing to meet expectations. I imagine getting a lower bonus is only one of many ways in which the firm tells you to get your shit straight if you aren't doing 2200+. Doesn't sound like a place that abides coasting.
Basically seems like a shithole place to work all around, I guess is my point.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
Their selectivity is wildly overrated. At Northwestern it was like 3.6 cutoff. Thats top 30%.moonman157 wrote:So like, what is the incentive of Quinn then? They're super grade-selective, so the people that go there have plenty of options (presumably). Is it really just people drinking the kool-aid? I know it's a good firm, especially if you're set on litigation, but I can't imagine it's worth it.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
zero personality filter also broadens the pool
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
yea but what about the 90%+ rate of cases wondixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah I'm just saying if you go to Quinn and are surprised that the standard is "soulless striver," you weren't paying attention.Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:1900 hours is hardly coasting. The difference between 1900 and 2200 is never having vacation. That may not matter to you if you're some kind of soulless striver, but most normal people go nuts under such conditions.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Regardless of how much 2100 versus 2000 sucks, it's not like it should be a surprise to Quinn associates that doing less than that means you're failing to meet expectations. I imagine getting a lower bonus is only one of many ways in which the firm tells you to get your shit straight if you aren't doing 2200+. Doesn't sound like a place that abides coasting.
Basically seems like a shithole place to work all around, I guess is my point.
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
The whole "just come to a cocktail party fuck OCI!" recruiting model seems to say it all about the firm. It's a way to be cheap and catch a whole bunch of anonymous law students in their recruiting net, passed off as some cool, idiosyncratic move. Have some $2 flip flops, you'll work the chillest 100 hour weeks here!
- 84651846190
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
lol, they're not that grade selective. i don't know where this falsehood originated. probably from the PR people at Quinn. they are probably less selective than firms like Lathammoonman157 wrote:So like, what is the incentive of Quinn then? They're super grade-selective, so the people that go there have plenty of options (presumably). Is it really just people drinking the kool-aid? I know it's a good firm, especially if you're set on litigation, but I can't imagine it's worth it.
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
a lot of ppl with good grades probably do go to quinn. but that's what happens when you select for weirdos
- 84651846190
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
i mean, this guy got a job at Quinn straight off of his clerkship (with no honors from Washington and Lee): http://www.quinnemanuel.com/attorneys/patel-ketan
if Quinn is grade selective, they certainly don't have hard cutoffs like Wilmer, Covington, GDC or other firms.
if Quinn is grade selective, they certainly don't have hard cutoffs like Wilmer, Covington, GDC or other firms.
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
he graduated from UF in 09 though. he saw three national championships. i think he knows winning.
- KD35
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:30 am
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
Is Latham considered that grade selective?Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:lol, they're not that grade selective. i don't know where this falsehood originated. probably from the PR people at Quinn. they are probably less selective than firms like Lathammoonman157 wrote:So like, what is the incentive of Quinn then? They're super grade-selective, so the people that go there have plenty of options (presumably). Is it really just people drinking the kool-aid? I know it's a good firm, especially if you're set on litigation, but I can't imagine it's worth it.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
If ur at HYSCCN, none of these firms are particularly grade selective barring WLRK, Boies, Susman, W&C, S&C and a few others.KD35 wrote:Is Latham considered that grade selective?Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:lol, they're not that grade selective. i don't know where this falsehood originated. probably from the PR people at Quinn. they are probably less selective than firms like Lathammoonman157 wrote:So like, what is the incentive of Quinn then? They're super grade-selective, so the people that go there have plenty of options (presumably). Is it really just people drinking the kool-aid? I know it's a good firm, especially if you're set on litigation, but I can't imagine it's worth it.
They could be personality selective, though. S&C is not. Got the grades? You'll get the offer.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
highly credited poastanonnymouse wrote:SPS, a TTT in decline. LJL at 2011 KE 2400 hr bros stylin on 2011 QE 2700 hr flip flop-havers. CHECK YOU BONUSES, John Quinn.Desert Fox wrote:Fatduck throwing his Quinn Sandals in the trash.
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
tytyBig Shrimpin wrote:highly credited poastanonnymouse wrote:SPS, a TTT in decline. LJL at 2011 KE 2400 hr bros stylin on 2011 QE 2700 hr flip flop-havers. CHECK YOU BONUSES, John Quinn.Desert Fox wrote:Fatduck throwing his Quinn Sandals in the trash.
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
sup shrimps
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
still not firedfats provolone wrote:sup shrimps
living the dream
going to start poasting more in 2015
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
yehanonnymouse wrote:tytyBig Shrimpin wrote:highly credited poastanonnymouse wrote:SPS, a TTT in decline. LJL at 2011 KE 2400 hr bros stylin on 2011 QE 2700 hr flip flop-havers. CHECK YOU BONUSES, John Quinn.Desert Fox wrote:Fatduck throwing his Quinn Sandals in the trash.
but tbh, fck the meat grinder, big bonuses or not
id take free (consecutive) days off/no consequences over a fatter bonus...1 vaca in 2 yrs
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
It's probably far more expensive to send 10+ attorneys and rent out a restaurant than it is to send 2-3 to OCI. They still fly people out for callbacks and pay for hotels and shit. There are a lot of valid criticisms of Quinn's model imo but their recruiting schtick isn't done to save money.dixiecupdrinking wrote:The whole "just come to a cocktail party fuck OCI!" recruiting model seems to say it all about the firm. It's a way to be cheap and catch a whole bunch of anonymous law students in their recruiting net, passed off as some cool, idiosyncratic move. Have some $2 flip flops, you'll work the chillest 100 hour weeks here!
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
88.6% now, brehmvp99 wrote:yea but what about the 90%+ rate of cases wondixiecupdrinking wrote:Yeah I'm just saying if you go to Quinn and are surprised that the standard is "soulless striver," you weren't paying attention.Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:1900 hours is hardly coasting. The difference between 1900 and 2200 is never having vacation. That may not matter to you if you're some kind of soulless striver, but most normal people go nuts under such conditions.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Regardless of how much 2100 versus 2000 sucks, it's not like it should be a surprise to Quinn associates that doing less than that means you're failing to meet expectations. I imagine getting a lower bonus is only one of many ways in which the firm tells you to get your shit straight if you aren't doing 2200+. Doesn't sound like a place that abides coasting.
Basically seems like a shithole place to work all around, I guess is my point.
-
- Posts: 428459
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
Quinn picked me up at LAX in a black car. I thought it was a nice touch.2014 wrote:It's probably far more expensive to send 10+ attorneys and rent out a restaurant than it is to send 2-3 to OCI. They still fly people out for callbacks and pay for hotels and shit. There are a lot of valid criticisms of Quinn's model imo but their recruiting schtick isn't done to save money.dixiecupdrinking wrote:The whole "just come to a cocktail party fuck OCI!" recruiting model seems to say it all about the firm. It's a way to be cheap and catch a whole bunch of anonymous law students in their recruiting net, passed off as some cool, idiosyncratic move. Have some $2 flip flops, you'll work the chillest 100 hour weeks here!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
awesome
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
Renting out a Chipotle definitely more expensive than doing OCI2014 wrote:It's probably far more expensive to send 10+ attorneys and rent out a restaurant than it is to send 2-3 to OCI. They still fly people out for callbacks and pay for hotels and shit. There are a lot of valid criticisms of Quinn's model imo but their recruiting schtick isn't done to save money.dixiecupdrinking wrote:The whole "just come to a cocktail party fuck OCI!" recruiting model seems to say it all about the firm. It's a way to be cheap and catch a whole bunch of anonymous law students in their recruiting net, passed off as some cool, idiosyncratic move. Have some $2 flip flops, you'll work the chillest 100 hour weeks here!
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
don't schools charge a fucking fortune for interview slots?
-
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 5:54 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
i thought so too, so google:
UCLA is $600 + $179 per room per day. http://law.ucla.edu/~/media/Assets/Care ... _2014.ashx
USC is $775 per room per day, http://weblaw.usc.edu/assets/docs/caree ... Invite.pdf
uva looks to be $800 for the first room, plus $500 for subsequent rooms. http://www.law.virginia.edu/lawweb/laww ... /Employers
stanford is $600 per room per day, https://www.law.stanford.edu/careers/em ... l-oci#fees
harvard is tbd, http://www.law.harvard.edu/current/care ... index.html
none of these mention the hospitality suites, which i think are supposed to be expensive. heard multiple recruiters bitching about their ROI when they found out they didn't get the top tier hospitality suite room in my T11.33333333. this may be unique to the lawskools that use their own facilities for interviews rather than a hotel or whatever
UCLA is $600 + $179 per room per day. http://law.ucla.edu/~/media/Assets/Care ... _2014.ashx
USC is $775 per room per day, http://weblaw.usc.edu/assets/docs/caree ... Invite.pdf
uva looks to be $800 for the first room, plus $500 for subsequent rooms. http://www.law.virginia.edu/lawweb/laww ... /Employers
stanford is $600 per room per day, https://www.law.stanford.edu/careers/em ... l-oci#fees
harvard is tbd, http://www.law.harvard.edu/current/care ... index.html
none of these mention the hospitality suites, which i think are supposed to be expensive. heard multiple recruiters bitching about their ROI when they found out they didn't get the top tier hospitality suite room in my T11.33333333. this may be unique to the lawskools that use their own facilities for interviews rather than a hotel or whatever
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login