2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Bonuses will be _____ from last year

Up
62
60%
Unchanged
35
34%
Down
6
6%
 
Total votes: 103

User avatar
84651846190

Gold
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by 84651846190 » Sun Dec 21, 2014 6:52 pm

dixiecupdrinking wrote:Regardless of how much 2100 versus 2000 sucks, it's not like it should be a surprise to Quinn associates that doing less than that means you're failing to meet expectations. I imagine getting a lower bonus is only one of many ways in which the firm tells you to get your shit straight if you aren't doing 2200+. Doesn't sound like a place that abides coasting.
1900 hours is hardly coasting. The difference between 1900 and 2200 is never having vacation. That may not matter to you if you're some kind of soulless striver, but most normal people go nuts under such conditions.

User avatar
moonman157

Silver
Posts: 1040
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 10:26 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by moonman157 » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:47 pm

So like, what is the incentive of Quinn then? They're super grade-selective, so the people that go there have plenty of options (presumably). Is it really just people drinking the kool-aid? I know it's a good firm, especially if you're set on litigation, but I can't imagine it's worth it.

dixiecupdrinking

Gold
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by dixiecupdrinking » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:55 pm

Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:
dixiecupdrinking wrote:Regardless of how much 2100 versus 2000 sucks, it's not like it should be a surprise to Quinn associates that doing less than that means you're failing to meet expectations. I imagine getting a lower bonus is only one of many ways in which the firm tells you to get your shit straight if you aren't doing 2200+. Doesn't sound like a place that abides coasting.
1900 hours is hardly coasting. The difference between 1900 and 2200 is never having vacation. That may not matter to you if you're some kind of soulless striver, but most normal people go nuts under such conditions.
Yeah I'm just saying if you go to Quinn and are surprised that the standard is "soulless striver," you weren't paying attention.

Basically seems like a shithole place to work all around, I guess is my point.

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by Desert Fox » Sun Dec 21, 2014 8:09 pm

moonman157 wrote:So like, what is the incentive of Quinn then? They're super grade-selective, so the people that go there have plenty of options (presumably). Is it really just people drinking the kool-aid? I know it's a good firm, especially if you're set on litigation, but I can't imagine it's worth it.
Their selectivity is wildly overrated. At Northwestern it was like 3.6 cutoff. Thats top 30%.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by fats provolone » Sun Dec 21, 2014 8:10 pm

zero personality filter also broadens the pool

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


mvp99

Silver
Posts: 1474
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by mvp99 » Sun Dec 21, 2014 8:19 pm

dixiecupdrinking wrote:
Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:
dixiecupdrinking wrote:Regardless of how much 2100 versus 2000 sucks, it's not like it should be a surprise to Quinn associates that doing less than that means you're failing to meet expectations. I imagine getting a lower bonus is only one of many ways in which the firm tells you to get your shit straight if you aren't doing 2200+. Doesn't sound like a place that abides coasting.
1900 hours is hardly coasting. The difference between 1900 and 2200 is never having vacation. That may not matter to you if you're some kind of soulless striver, but most normal people go nuts under such conditions.
Yeah I'm just saying if you go to Quinn and are surprised that the standard is "soulless striver," you weren't paying attention.

Basically seems like a shithole place to work all around, I guess is my point.
yea but what about the 90%+ rate of cases won

dixiecupdrinking

Gold
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by dixiecupdrinking » Sun Dec 21, 2014 8:22 pm

The whole "just come to a cocktail party fuck OCI!" recruiting model seems to say it all about the firm. It's a way to be cheap and catch a whole bunch of anonymous law students in their recruiting net, passed off as some cool, idiosyncratic move. Have some $2 flip flops, you'll work the chillest 100 hour weeks here!

User avatar
84651846190

Gold
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by 84651846190 » Sun Dec 21, 2014 8:40 pm

moonman157 wrote:So like, what is the incentive of Quinn then? They're super grade-selective, so the people that go there have plenty of options (presumably). Is it really just people drinking the kool-aid? I know it's a good firm, especially if you're set on litigation, but I can't imagine it's worth it.
lol, they're not that grade selective. i don't know where this falsehood originated. probably from the PR people at Quinn. they are probably less selective than firms like Latham

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by fats provolone » Sun Dec 21, 2014 8:44 pm

a lot of ppl with good grades probably do go to quinn. but that's what happens when you select for weirdos

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
84651846190

Gold
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by 84651846190 » Sun Dec 21, 2014 8:46 pm

i mean, this guy got a job at Quinn straight off of his clerkship (with no honors from Washington and Lee): http://www.quinnemanuel.com/attorneys/patel-ketan

if Quinn is grade selective, they certainly don't have hard cutoffs like Wilmer, Covington, GDC or other firms.

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by fats provolone » Sun Dec 21, 2014 8:51 pm

he graduated from UF in 09 though. he saw three national championships. i think he knows winning.

User avatar
KD35

Silver
Posts: 950
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:30 am

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by KD35 » Sun Dec 21, 2014 9:06 pm

Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:
moonman157 wrote:So like, what is the incentive of Quinn then? They're super grade-selective, so the people that go there have plenty of options (presumably). Is it really just people drinking the kool-aid? I know it's a good firm, especially if you're set on litigation, but I can't imagine it's worth it.
lol, they're not that grade selective. i don't know where this falsehood originated. probably from the PR people at Quinn. they are probably less selective than firms like Latham
Is Latham considered that grade selective?

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by Old Gregg » Sun Dec 21, 2014 9:12 pm

KD35 wrote:
Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:
moonman157 wrote:So like, what is the incentive of Quinn then? They're super grade-selective, so the people that go there have plenty of options (presumably). Is it really just people drinking the kool-aid? I know it's a good firm, especially if you're set on litigation, but I can't imagine it's worth it.
lol, they're not that grade selective. i don't know where this falsehood originated. probably from the PR people at Quinn. they are probably less selective than firms like Latham
Is Latham considered that grade selective?
If ur at HYSCCN, none of these firms are particularly grade selective barring WLRK, Boies, Susman, W&C, S&C and a few others.

They could be personality selective, though. S&C is not. Got the grades? You'll get the offer.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by Big Shrimpin » Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:51 pm

anonnymouse wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:Fatduck throwing his Quinn Sandals in the trash.
SPS, a TTT in decline. LJL at 2011 KE 2400 hr bros stylin on 2011 QE 2700 hr flip flop-havers. CHECK YOU BONUSES, John Quinn.
highly credited poast

anonnymouse

Bronze
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by anonnymouse » Sun Dec 21, 2014 11:09 pm

Big Shrimpin wrote:
anonnymouse wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:Fatduck throwing his Quinn Sandals in the trash.
SPS, a TTT in decline. LJL at 2011 KE 2400 hr bros stylin on 2011 QE 2700 hr flip flop-havers. CHECK YOU BONUSES, John Quinn.
highly credited poast
tyty

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by fats provolone » Sun Dec 21, 2014 11:20 pm

sup shrimps

User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by Big Shrimpin » Mon Dec 22, 2014 12:25 am

fats provolone wrote:sup shrimps
still not fired

living the dream

going to start poasting more in 2015

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Big Shrimpin

Gold
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by Big Shrimpin » Mon Dec 22, 2014 12:32 am

anonnymouse wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:
anonnymouse wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:Fatduck throwing his Quinn Sandals in the trash.
SPS, a TTT in decline. LJL at 2011 KE 2400 hr bros stylin on 2011 QE 2700 hr flip flop-havers. CHECK YOU BONUSES, John Quinn.
highly credited poast
tyty
yeh

but tbh, fck the meat grinder, big bonuses or not

id take free (consecutive) days off/no consequences over a fatter bonus...1 vaca in 2 yrs

User avatar
2014

Platinum
Posts: 6028
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by 2014 » Mon Dec 22, 2014 2:56 am

dixiecupdrinking wrote:The whole "just come to a cocktail party fuck OCI!" recruiting model seems to say it all about the firm. It's a way to be cheap and catch a whole bunch of anonymous law students in their recruiting net, passed off as some cool, idiosyncratic move. Have some $2 flip flops, you'll work the chillest 100 hour weeks here!
It's probably far more expensive to send 10+ attorneys and rent out a restaurant than it is to send 2-3 to OCI. They still fly people out for callbacks and pay for hotels and shit. There are a lot of valid criticisms of Quinn's model imo but their recruiting schtick isn't done to save money.

911 crisis actor

Bronze
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by 911 crisis actor » Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:42 am

mvp99 wrote:
dixiecupdrinking wrote:
Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:
dixiecupdrinking wrote:Regardless of how much 2100 versus 2000 sucks, it's not like it should be a surprise to Quinn associates that doing less than that means you're failing to meet expectations. I imagine getting a lower bonus is only one of many ways in which the firm tells you to get your shit straight if you aren't doing 2200+. Doesn't sound like a place that abides coasting.
1900 hours is hardly coasting. The difference between 1900 and 2200 is never having vacation. That may not matter to you if you're some kind of soulless striver, but most normal people go nuts under such conditions.
Yeah I'm just saying if you go to Quinn and are surprised that the standard is "soulless striver," you weren't paying attention.

Basically seems like a shithole place to work all around, I guess is my point.
yea but what about the 90%+ rate of cases won
88.6% now, breh

Anonymous User
Posts: 428459
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:07 am

2014 wrote:
dixiecupdrinking wrote:The whole "just come to a cocktail party fuck OCI!" recruiting model seems to say it all about the firm. It's a way to be cheap and catch a whole bunch of anonymous law students in their recruiting net, passed off as some cool, idiosyncratic move. Have some $2 flip flops, you'll work the chillest 100 hour weeks here!
It's probably far more expensive to send 10+ attorneys and rent out a restaurant than it is to send 2-3 to OCI. They still fly people out for callbacks and pay for hotels and shit. There are a lot of valid criticisms of Quinn's model imo but their recruiting schtick isn't done to save money.
Quinn picked me up at LAX in a black car. I thought it was a nice touch.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by fats provolone » Mon Dec 22, 2014 11:11 am

:lol: awesome

911 crisis actor

Bronze
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by 911 crisis actor » Mon Dec 22, 2014 11:33 am

2014 wrote:
dixiecupdrinking wrote:The whole "just come to a cocktail party fuck OCI!" recruiting model seems to say it all about the firm. It's a way to be cheap and catch a whole bunch of anonymous law students in their recruiting net, passed off as some cool, idiosyncratic move. Have some $2 flip flops, you'll work the chillest 100 hour weeks here!
It's probably far more expensive to send 10+ attorneys and rent out a restaurant than it is to send 2-3 to OCI. They still fly people out for callbacks and pay for hotels and shit. There are a lot of valid criticisms of Quinn's model imo but their recruiting schtick isn't done to save money.
Renting out a Chipotle definitely more expensive than doing OCI

User avatar
fats provolone

Platinum
Posts: 7125
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by fats provolone » Mon Dec 22, 2014 11:36 am

don't schools charge a fucking fortune for interview slots?

sprezz

Bronze
Posts: 467
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 5:54 pm

Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread

Post by sprezz » Mon Dec 22, 2014 12:12 pm

i thought so too, so google:

UCLA is $600 + $179 per room per day. http://law.ucla.edu/~/media/Assets/Care ... _2014.ashx

USC is $775 per room per day, http://weblaw.usc.edu/assets/docs/caree ... Invite.pdf

uva looks to be $800 for the first room, plus $500 for subsequent rooms. http://www.law.virginia.edu/lawweb/laww ... /Employers

stanford is $600 per room per day, https://www.law.stanford.edu/careers/em ... l-oci#fees

harvard is tbd, http://www.law.harvard.edu/current/care ... index.html

none of these mention the hospitality suites, which i think are supposed to be expensive. heard multiple recruiters bitching about their ROI when they found out they didn't get the top tier hospitality suite room in my T11.33333333. this may be unique to the lawskools that use their own facilities for interviews rather than a hotel or whatever

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”