Page 1 of 1
MoFo v. KTS (Palo Alto) Patent Prosecution
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:46 pm
by Anonymous User
Can anyone give pros and cons of Morrison & Foerster and Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton as well as any comparisons between the two for patent prosecution?
Re: MoFo v. KTS (Palo Alto) Patent Prosecution
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:50 pm
by Anonymous User
2L who CBed and ultimately decided between these firms and several others
My impression is that hours would be much, much better at KTS, but your pay (especially when taking into account rate of growth over years) will be a bit lower
Also, enormous office vs. small office, obvious differences... I felt that it would be much more likely to have a long and stable career at KTS, at least the way they pitch it that way.
But, if MoFo is SF, I would wayyyyy rather live in SF, as a single 20something. Or if commuting from SF, 15 minute commute to MoFo on muni >>>>> 1 hour commute on caltrain+shuttle/bike
Re: MoFo v. KTS (Palo Alto) Patent Prosecution
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 6:45 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone give pros and cons of Morrison & Foerster and Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton as well as any comparisons between the two for patent prosecution?
OP: SA or lateral?
Re: MoFo v. KTS (Palo Alto) Patent Prosecution
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 7:20 pm
by Anonymous User
lateral
Re: MoFo v. KTS (Palo Alto) Patent Prosecution
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:53 am
by Anonymous User
bump
Re: MoFo v. KTS (Palo Alto) Patent Prosecution
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 1:28 pm
by Anonymous User
I've heard QoL is much better at KTS. FWIW, though heard secondhand, apparently lateraling to MoFo is a difficult transition.
Re: MoFo v. KTS (Palo Alto) Patent Prosecution
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 1:58 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:I've heard QoL is much better at KTS. FWIW, though heard secondhand, apparently lateraling to MoFo is a difficult transition.
Can you elaborate a little on what you have heard? If not, no worries.