Law Prof. Interview Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Law Prof. Interview
I'm a junior biglaw bro. I got a call today to interview for a tenure-track law prof. job in a pretty cool, non-major city. Pay is like 1/3 biglaw. Do I want this job? I just applied for prof. positions because I had a shitty day at work, but it sounds kinda rad.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
Yes. No need to make the final decision now - go interview.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
You don't need to accept it, even if you go. Also the lifestyle of a law prof is sooo relaxed. They legitimately don't need to work 5 days a week, let alone 60+ hours a week. Give it a shot, would be cool to check it out.Anonymous User wrote:I'm a junior biglaw bro. I got a call today to interview for a tenure-track law prof. job in a pretty cool, non-major city. Pay is like 1/3 biglaw. Do I want this job? I just applied for prof. positions because I had a shitty day at work, but it sounds kinda rad.
- patogordo
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:33 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
also how did you do this
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
My post is a little whimsical to stay anonymous, but there's a set system and an oci type set up where all the candidates that get bids and schools go to dc.patogordo wrote:also how did you do this
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- patogordo
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:33 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
oh the meat market. lol it sounded like you just called up a random school like "yo can i be a prof" and they said sure npAnonymous User wrote:My post is a little whimsical to stay anonymous, but there's a set system and an oci type set up where all the candidates that get bids and schools go to dc.patogordo wrote:also how did you do this
still congrats
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
Do you want to teach and write law review articles? That's basically what you'd be doing. Oh, and eventually committee work (where you try to get faculty to agree on things, ha). There are very few boundaries between work life/personal life in academia (but after biglaw I doubt that would be so bad). You'd also probably have to believe that LR articles are worth something, or you'd find academia really frustrating.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Law Prof. Interview
looks like a DF thread
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
I get where you're coming from, but law reviews are at least as important as the paper shuffling I do for 12 hours a day now.A. Nony Mouse wrote:Do you want to teach and write law review articles? That's basically what you'd be doing. Oh, and eventually committee work (where you try to get faculty to agree on things, ha). There are very few boundaries between work life/personal life in academia (but after biglaw I doubt that would be so bad). You'd also probably have to believe that LR articles are worth something, or you'd find academia really frustrating.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Fri Sep 26, 2014 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
Sure, but it doesn't sound like shuffling those papers is really fulfilling you right now. (I mean, if you do think LR articles are worth sometime that's cool too, profs generally do.)Anonymous User wrote:I get where you're coming from, but Law reviews are at least as important as the paper shuffling I do for 12 hours a day now.A. Nony Mouse wrote:Do you want to teach and write law review articles? That's basically what you'd be doing. Oh, and eventually committee work (where you try to get faculty to agree on things, ha). There are very few boundaries between work life/personal life in academia (but after biglaw I doubt that would be so bad). You'd also probably have to believe that LR articles are worth something, or you'd find academia really frustrating.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
Sounds like I'm up against 3-4 others from the call. I've never done the meat market before. Just fell into it.patogordo wrote:oh the meat market. lol it sounded like you just called up a random school like "yo can i be a prof" and they said sure npAnonymous User wrote:My post is a little whimsical to stay anonymous, but there's a set system and an oci type set up where all the candidates that get bids and schools go to dc.patogordo wrote:also how did you do this
still congrats
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
It's not bad. I have bad days where I come home take some shots and start applying to jobs, but all in all it's fine. Nothing great, nothing too fulfilling. I doubt I could make as much as I do with my skillset doing anything else, and if I could it would be a similarly intense job.A. Nony Mouse wrote:Sure, but it doesn't sound like shuffling those papers is really fulfilling you right now.Anonymous User wrote:I get where you're coming from, but Law reviews are at least as important as the paper shuffling I do for 12 hours a day now.A. Nony Mouse wrote:Do you want to teach and write law review articles? That's basically what you'd be doing. Oh, and eventually committee work (where you try to get faculty to agree on things, ha). There are very few boundaries between work life/personal life in academia (but after biglaw I doubt that would be so bad). You'd also probably have to believe that LR articles are worth something, or you'd find academia really frustrating.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
Also, anyone have intel on what schools want to hear in a prof. interview? Do ties matter?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
Also, if I get it, TLS should help write my syllabus.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
I suspect a great deal will be about your research agenda - what you want to write about, how you plan to do it. Maybe also what courses you want to teach and how you'd go about teaching them. (At least, extrapolating from general academic interviews.)Anonymous User wrote:Also, anyone have intel on what schools want to hear in a prof. interview? Do ties matter?
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
I think this would be helpful to review before interviews: http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblaw ... t-asu.html
Also, you should reach out to professors you had good relationships with in law school. A few of my professors encouraged me to pursue academia and said to make sure I got back in touch with them if I headed down that path. Apparently, they are able to be very helpful down the road. Good luck!
Also, you should reach out to professors you had good relationships with in law school. A few of my professors encouraged me to pursue academia and said to make sure I got back in touch with them if I headed down that path. Apparently, they are able to be very helpful down the road. Good luck!
- XxSpyKEx
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:48 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
Surprised that the pay is only 1/3 of biglaw pay. I was under the impression that law profs made around $300k /year to work like 5 hours per weekAnonymous User wrote:I'm a junior biglaw bro. I got a call today to interview for a tenure-track law prof. job in a pretty cool, non-major city. Pay is like 1/3 biglaw. Do I want this job? I just applied for prof. positions because I had a shitty day at work, but it sounds kinda rad.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
No. This school seems to have lower prof. salaries than the school I graduated from.XxSpyKEx wrote:Surprised that the pay is only 1/3 of biglaw pay. I was under the impression that law profs made around $300k /year to work like 5 hours per weekAnonymous User wrote:I'm a junior biglaw bro. I got a call today to interview for a tenure-track law prof. job in a pretty cool, non-major city. Pay is like 1/3 biglaw. Do I want this job? I just applied for prof. positions because I had a shitty day at work, but it sounds kinda rad.
Another question: how sure do I need to be that this is my path before I accept? One thing about biglaw is that it keeps a fair number of post-biglaw doors open. Who would hire someone that taught for a few years and then wanted to go back to practice? Probably no one, right? While I'm pretty excited, the idea of closing doors always gives me the chills.
- MarkRenton
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:54 pm
Re: Law Prof. Interview
Hey, I made the jump from lawyer to academia. Feel free to message me if you have questions. I would HIGHLY recommend academia, fwiw
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
Depends on who you are. If you were some SCOTUS litigator who did some bad ass shit before becoming a prof, then a lot of firms will scoop you up in a heartbeat. If you were a nobody 3rd year biglaw associate with no substantive experience in anything, then it might be harder to get back into practicing. Although, as a practical matter, no tenure track profs ever leave academia to practice. Being a law prof is likely the easiest and chillest job you will find in this profession, so it's not difficult to figure out why virtually no tenure track law profs ever go back to practicing. Personally, I'd jump on the opportunity and never look back.Anonymous User wrote:No. This school seems to have lower prof. salaries than the school I graduated from.XxSpyKEx wrote:Surprised that the pay is only 1/3 of biglaw pay. I was under the impression that law profs made around $300k /year to work like 5 hours per weekAnonymous User wrote:I'm a junior biglaw bro. I got a call today to interview for a tenure-track law prof. job in a pretty cool, non-major city. Pay is like 1/3 biglaw. Do I want this job? I just applied for prof. positions because I had a shitty day at work, but it sounds kinda rad.
Another question: how sure do I need to be that this is my path before I accept? One thing about biglaw is that it keeps a fair number of post-biglaw doors open. Who would hire someone that taught for a few years and then wanted to go back to practice? Probably no one, right? While I'm pretty excited, the idea of closing doors always gives me the chills.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
I'm just a nobody man. The job does sound sweet. I'm just nervous that I get there and I realize that I'd rather have money.Anonymous User wrote: Depends on who you are. If you were some SCOTUS litigator who did some bad ass shit before becoming a prof, then a lot of firms will scoop you up in a heartbeat. If you were a nobody 3rd year biglaw associate with no substantive experience in anything, then it might be harder to get back into practicing. Although, as a practical matter, no tenure track profs ever leave academia to practice. Being a law prof is likely the easiest and chillest job you will find in this profession, so it's not difficult to figure out why virtually no tenure track law profs ever go back to practicing. Personally, I'd jump on the opportunity and never look back.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- MarkRenton
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:54 pm
Re: Law Prof. Interview
That's 100% it. It's also a lot more secure of a position than at any big law firm.Anonymous User wrote:Depends on who you are. If you were some SCOTUS litigator who did some bad ass shit before becoming a prof, then a lot of firms will scoop you up in a heartbeat. If you were a nobody 3rd year biglaw associate with no substantive experience in anything, then it might be harder to get back into practicing. Although, as a practical matter, no tenure track profs ever leave academia to practice. Being a law prof is likely the easiest and chillest job you will find in this profession, so it's not difficult to figure out why virtually no tenure track law profs ever go back to practicing. Personally, I'd jump on the opportunity and never look back.Anonymous User wrote:No. This school seems to have lower prof. salaries than the school I graduated from.XxSpyKEx wrote:Surprised that the pay is only 1/3 of biglaw pay. I was under the impression that law profs made around $300k /year to work like 5 hours per weekAnonymous User wrote:I'm a junior biglaw bro. I got a call today to interview for a tenure-track law prof. job in a pretty cool, non-major city. Pay is like 1/3 biglaw. Do I want this job? I just applied for prof. positions because I had a shitty day at work, but it sounds kinda rad.
Another question: how sure do I need to be that this is my path before I accept? One thing about biglaw is that it keeps a fair number of post-biglaw doors open. Who would hire someone that taught for a few years and then wanted to go back to practice? Probably no one, right? While I'm pretty excited, the idea of closing doors always gives me the chills.
- XxSpyKEx
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:48 am
Re: Law Prof. Interview
You could always try to lateral to another school that pays more with a few years of teaching experience (and publications). Most law profs are pretty well paid, for the amount of work they do. I mean it will never pay biglaw partner salaries, but odds you'll ever see that are pretty low anyways.Anonymous User wrote:I'm just a nobody man. The job does sound sweet. I'm just nervous that I get there and I realize that I'd rather have money.Anonymous User wrote: Depends on who you are. If you were some SCOTUS litigator who did some bad ass shit before becoming a prof, then a lot of firms will scoop you up in a heartbeat. If you were a nobody 3rd year biglaw associate with no substantive experience in anything, then it might be harder to get back into practicing. Although, as a practical matter, no tenure track profs ever leave academia to practice. Being a law prof is likely the easiest and chillest job you will find in this profession, so it's not difficult to figure out why virtually no tenure track law profs ever go back to practicing. Personally, I'd jump on the opportunity and never look back.
Especially once you're tenured. I've definitely heard of numerous profs who just stop doing anything except teaching their classes after getting tenure (so like 5 hours of work per week at a law school lol).MarkRenton wrote: It's also a lot more secure of a position than at any big law firm.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login