More $ with more specific Practice or less $ with choice
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:18 pm
Hey all, thanks in advance for advice.
I've been fortunate enough to secure two offers in my Secondary hometown, and I'm having a very hard time choosing.
The first is for a firm that is very well-regarded in the city (and region as a whole), and allows summers to, as common, select any work they want to do, and presumably choose their practice area. The firm pays about 20K less than the other, albeit still a great salary (110-120)
The second is for a satellite office of a firm that is based in another city in the state, however I would be constrained to a specific type of litigation. It sounded like they are only interested in hiring for this group, and the practice area is mainly what the office does.
I'm interested in litigation, however I'm not SURE I want to do litigation. I'm kind of leaning towards the first firm, however my mind is in no way made up. Do people think that it's a bad idea to limit myself to a specific practice area this early on? Should I be asking any more questions from the firm? I will say I liked both firms, and the people at both were great.
I won't say that money is no object, but I think there's enough of a difference to ponder. Thanks a lot.
I've been fortunate enough to secure two offers in my Secondary hometown, and I'm having a very hard time choosing.
The first is for a firm that is very well-regarded in the city (and region as a whole), and allows summers to, as common, select any work they want to do, and presumably choose their practice area. The firm pays about 20K less than the other, albeit still a great salary (110-120)
The second is for a satellite office of a firm that is based in another city in the state, however I would be constrained to a specific type of litigation. It sounded like they are only interested in hiring for this group, and the practice area is mainly what the office does.
I'm interested in litigation, however I'm not SURE I want to do litigation. I'm kind of leaning towards the first firm, however my mind is in no way made up. Do people think that it's a bad idea to limit myself to a specific practice area this early on? Should I be asking any more questions from the firm? I will say I liked both firms, and the people at both were great.
I won't say that money is no object, but I think there's enough of a difference to ponder. Thanks a lot.