Picking a firm based on clerkship boost? Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Firm A or Firm B?

Firm A
0
No votes
Firm B
4
100%
 
Total votes: 4

Anonymous User
Posts: 428543
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Picking a firm based on clerkship boost?

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:32 pm

Scenario:

Prestige-obsessed 2L wants to get a COA clerkship.
Doesn't want to live in DC long-term.
Has an offer at the DC office of firm A (one of GDC/Kirkland/Hogan/JD/Latham/Skadde/Sidley/Wilmer).
Would rather take offer at Firm B in a different market based on geography and general fit.
Firm A will likely give me a bump in clerkship prospects over firm B by virtue of the national recognition and the fact that it is in DC. Assume this is true, even if you don't think it is.
If I went with Firm A, the plan would be to get hired somewhere else in a different city after finishing clerkship.

Is this a reasonable plan, or should I just bite the bullet and take the hit to clerkship prospects in order to end up at the firm/city I would rather be at long-term?

ETA: assume stats are good enough to have a non-zero chance at a feeder or semi-feeder, where the boost from Firm A would be most appreciable.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428543
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Picking a firm based on clerkship boost?

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:34 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Scenario:

Prestige-obsessed 2L wants to get a COA clerkship.
Doesn't want to live in DC long-term.
Has an offer at the DC office of firm A (one of GDC/Kirkland/Hogan/JD/Latham/Skadde/Sidley/Wilmer).
Would rather take offer at Firm B in a different market based on geography and general fit.
Firm A will likely give me a bump in clerkship prospects over firm B by virtue of the national recognition and the fact that it is in DC. Assume this is true, even if you don't think it is.
If I went with Firm A, the plan would be to get hired somewhere else in a different city after finishing clerkship.

Is this a reasonable plan, or should I just bite the bullet and take the hit to clerkship prospects in order to end up at the firm/city I would rather be at long-term?
Take the hit. If you don't want to be in DC, be somewhere else and live your life.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428543
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Picking a firm based on clerkship boost?

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:36 pm

If you have a city you want to be at long term, get hired by a district judge in that city, and then apply for a COA clerkship for the year or two after that. Problem solved.

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Picking a firm based on clerkship boost?

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:40 pm

I know you said assume it matters, but I really don't think firms matter for getting clerkships. Besides, clerking is enough of a crapshoot you might get nothing, and then be stuck somewhere you hate. Take the offer where you want to be.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428543
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Picking a firm based on clerkship boost?

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:47 pm

A. Nony Mouse wrote:I know you said assume it matters, but I really don't think firms matter for getting clerkships. Besides, clerking is enough of a crapshoot you might get nothing, and then be stuck somewhere you hate. Take the offer where you want to be.
OP

Assume that stats are good enough to have a non-zero chance at snagging a feeder or semi-feeder (as good of a chance as someone from non-HYSCC can expect, I guess). The boost for feeders and semi-feeders is really what I think Firm A would give. Any change in your analysis?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
sundance95

Gold
Posts: 2123
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm

Re: Picking a firm based on clerkship boost?

Post by sundance95 » Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:50 pm

A. Nony Mouse wrote:I know you said assume it matters, but I really don't think firms matter for getting clerkships. Besides, clerking is enough of a crapshoot you might get nothing, and then be stuck somewhere you hate. Take the offer where you want to be.
This. I worried about this too, but ended up turning down similar firms for a lesser-known shop and still ended up with a great CoA clerkship in DC/2nd/9th. Prof recs are far, far more important than your SA firm.

User avatar
DELG

Gold
Posts: 3021
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: Picking a firm based on clerkship boost?

Post by DELG » Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:51 pm

you're going to go to DC no matter what we say because even if it definitively doesn't matter you'll still be scared it does 't just accept your DC offer

anonymous2012

New
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: Picking a firm based on clerkship boost?

Post by anonymous2012 » Fri Sep 19, 2014 3:07 pm

If your SA is at Wilmer or Jones Day issues and appeals I'd go for that. Otherwise I'd go for the local firm. Honestly there is a pretty sizeable prestige gap between some of your SA alternatives.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428543
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Picking a firm based on clerkship boost?

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 19, 2014 3:32 pm

anonymous2012 wrote:If your SA is at Wilmer or Jones Day issues and appeals I'd go for that. Otherwise I'd go for the local firm. Honestly there is a pretty sizeable prestige gap between some of your SA alternatives.
Does JD give some people SA offers in issues and appeals? Never heard of that.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


anonymous2012

New
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: Picking a firm based on clerkship boost?

Post by anonymous2012 » Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:22 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
anonymous2012 wrote:If your SA is at Wilmer or Jones Day issues and appeals I'd go for that. Otherwise I'd go for the local firm. Honestly there is a pretty sizeable prestige gap between some of your SA alternatives.
Does JD give some people SA offers in issues and appeals? Never heard of that.
Prob not but if OP really has feeder judge credentials I find it hard to believe they couldn't get some assurances of work in that group. The point is though that your SA at Sidley isn't going to make or break your feeder judge aspirations absent some unforeseeable personal connection.

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Picking a firm based on clerkship boost?

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:27 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
A. Nony Mouse wrote:I know you said assume it matters, but I really don't think firms matter for getting clerkships. Besides, clerking is enough of a crapshoot you might get nothing, and then be stuck somewhere you hate. Take the offer where you want to be.
OP

Assume that stats are good enough to have a non-zero chance at snagging a feeder or semi-feeder (as good of a chance as someone from non-HYSCC can expect, I guess). The boost for feeders and semi-feeders is really what I think Firm A would give. Any change in your analysis?
Honestly, no, because the little I know about feeders doesn't suggest that firm makes a particular difference. But we're way above my pay grade.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”