Baker Botts v. V&E (Houston Lit.) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
asdfqerzxcv
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2014 1:46 am
Baker Botts v. V&E (Houston Lit.)
Things to keep in mind when weighing the two? I'm leaning decently toward litigation.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428484
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Baker Botts v. V&E (Houston Lit.)
BB is top dogs in lit, whereas V&E may have a leg up for corporate. If you want lit not sure there is any reason to choose v&e in this situationasdfqerzxcv wrote:Things to keep in mind when weighing the two? I'm leaning decently toward litigation.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428484
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Baker Botts v. V&E (Houston Lit.)
I declined V&E because I got the sense that their lit group wasn't doing as well as other Houston firms.
-
BearLaw
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:23 pm
Re: Baker Botts v. V&E (Houston Lit.)
V&E's lit group is tiny. They are fantastic on the corporate side, but if you even think you want to do lit long term, BB is the way to go.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
