Dinner With Partner, But No Offer? Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 428546
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Dinner With Partner, But No Offer?

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Aug 27, 2014 10:15 pm

.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: Dinner With Partner, But No Offer?

Post by Old Gregg » Wed Aug 27, 2014 10:18 pm

nobody on this forum will know what this means. but having dinner with a partner (initiated by him) can't be bad.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428546
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Dinner With Partner, But No Offer?

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Aug 27, 2014 10:24 pm

.

User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Dinner With Partner, But No Offer?

Post by jbagelboy » Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:28 pm

not exactly the same, but I got pretty close to a partner who conducted my screener interviewer and who gave me a callback, we met for drinks (not a general firm reception, just us) before the callback to talk about the firm and my "options" ect. and talked on the phone (nice conversation, very positive) the day after the callback, and I wound up not getting an offer. I wanted to email the partner after my rejection email to just be like really, wtf leading me on? But I didn't because I thought maybe I could reach out to him in case I wanted to switch it up at 3L oci or something

Moral of this story was, don't be fooled by the high opinion of one partner at a huge firm where a hiring committee makes decisions often in somewhat random and convoluted ways. To this day after this entire process I do not understand what the relationship between the screener interviewer and the final decision is: it seems like the screener interviewer often makes the offer call (unless its a day-of offer from the hiring partner), but they aren't involved in the actual decision post-CB.

ETA: also please don't quote. will delete.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”