Top Law Schools

I got an interview in LA off of a mass mail. The interview is 4 hours long. I'll be interviewing with 4 attorneys for a half hour each and then going out to lunch with two more attorneys. This will be my first interview with them. It seems more like a CB interview than a screener.

Anyone have any experience with this? I searched the forum and there did not seem to be anything directly on point.

Sounds like a CB

Anonymous User wrote:I got an interview in LA off of a mass mail. The interview is 4 hours long. I'll be interviewing with 4 attorneys for a half hour each and then going out to lunch with two more attorneys. This will be my first interview with them. It seems more like a CB interview than a screener.

Anyone have any experience with this? I searched the forum and there did not seem to be anything directly on point.

Obvi a callback

OP here, except this is my first interview with them. So I skipped straight to the CB step?

Correct. Brush up on the firm. Have some good questions for yor interviewers. Relax. Eat some good food with the associates. Bring it home.

JohannDeMann wrote:Correct. Brush up on the firm. Have some good questions for yor interviewers. Relax. Eat some good food with the associates. Bring it home.

Well that's good news. Thanks!

this is obviously a callback. lol at a four hour screener. Good luck!

I've had this happen before three times with interviews outside the OCI/symplicity context (two mass mail plus one that didn't want to list on symplicity but asked CSO for a specific short list). It is a CB in that you shouldn't expect a subsequent interview, but I don't think anyone could have the kind of information to say that it's as likely to get you an offer as a traditional screener/CB combination.

BVest wrote:I've had this happen before three times with interviews outside the OCI/symplicity context (two mass mail plus one that didn't want to list on symplicity but asked CSO for a specific short list). It is a CB in that you shouldn't expect a subsequent interview, but I don't think anyone could have the kind of information to say that it's as likely to get you an offer as a traditional screener/CB combination.

That is kind of what I expected. A one off of sorts.

Anonymous User wrote:

BVest wrote:I've had this happen before three times with interviews outside the OCI/symplicity context (two mass mail plus one that didn't want to list on symplicity but asked CSO for a specific short list). It is a CB in that you shouldn't expect a subsequent interview, but I don't think anyone could have the kind of information to say that it's as likely to get you an offer as a traditional screener/CB combination.

That is kind of what I expected. A one off of sorts.

Has happened to me too. Got an offer, summering there now. Good luck OP!

I have an interview that I got from mass mailing in a couple days that is 1 hour long (1 associate, 1 partner, each for half an hour).

Do we think this is a one off or more on the screener level?