GW OCI 2014 - Meh? Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 3:51 pm

Nixon Peabody post-cb ding

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 11, 2014 1:15 pm

Anything recently? I'm basically struck out, but hoping for my class mates.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Sep 13, 2014 2:45 pm

Still waiting post screener for Finnegan & Milbank DC. Rude.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:02 pm

Just got a snail mail ding from Christie Parker Hale thanking me for interviewing with them.

I never got selected for a screener. :(

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 16, 2014 8:15 am

Any word from Fish & Richardson?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:34 pm

Any word from Simpson Thacher (DC)?

misanthrope

New
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 1:32 pm

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by misanthrope » Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:41 am

All offers at GULC for Simpson have gone out. Friend said Simpson seemed to be finished with recruiting a few weeks ago.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Dec 03, 2014 2:11 pm

As someone who has just been admitted to GW, curious about how OCI bids work at GW?

Is it completely dependent on GPA? They don't care about LSAT/Undergrad GPA?

Thx

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Dec 03, 2014 2:21 pm

Completely GPA and a bloodbath. Don't come here.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Avian

Bronze
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:04 pm

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Avian » Wed Dec 03, 2014 7:10 pm

Anonymous User wrote:As someone who has just been admitted to GW, curious about how OCI bids work at GW?

Is it completely dependent on GPA? They don't care about LSAT/Undergrad GPA?

Thx
I don't know if any OCI employers care about your LSAT or Undergrad GPA.

User avatar
postard

Bronze
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:39 pm

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by postard » Wed Dec 03, 2014 8:20 pm

Some firms will ask for your undergraduate transcript (especially for IP positions), but I think its more to see relevant course work than for the GPA. What school your going to is a pretty good proxy for that.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Dec 07, 2014 10:07 am

So OCI seems to have gone very poorly this year...Any sense of whether GW is still IPSecure?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Dec 07, 2014 10:58 am

The school admitted 100 more in the entering class and admitted a 100 person transfer class. They're doubling down going forward. Avoid.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
fltanglab

Silver
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:44 pm

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by fltanglab » Tue Dec 09, 2014 2:22 pm

Anonymous User wrote:So OCI seems to have gone very poorly this year...Any sense of whether GW is still IPSecure?
Yes. IP 2Ls did really well. I think better than last year.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Dec 09, 2014 10:22 pm

Did people really feel like OCI was more of a bloodbath than usual? To be clear, OCI at GW is always a bloodbath--I think only 20% get an SA, which is a reasonable estimate when one considers GW's information on LST--but I'm not convinced this year was worse than that. Seemed like GW scholars got offers generally, upper-crust of TM got offers at like a 50/50 rate, and past that it was a crapshoot other than IP kids.

Also, to future GW students reading this thread--if you want biglaw, you need to bid in the NY regional. This is particularly true if you are upper TM, think top 15%-top 25%. I don't care if you don't want to live in NYC. I know multiple people with decent-to-great credentials who got no callbacks in DC but several in NYC. You will not be an exception to this rule.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Dec 09, 2014 11:19 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Did people really feel like OCI was more of a bloodbath than usual? To be clear, OCI at GW is always a bloodbath--I think only 20% get an SA, which is a reasonable estimate when one considers GW's information on LST--but I'm not convinced this year was worse than that. Seemed like GW scholars got offers generally, upper-crust of TM got offers at like a 50/50 rate, and past that it was a crapshoot other than IP kids.

Also, to future GW students reading this thread--if you want biglaw, you need to bid in the NY regional. This is particularly true if you are upper TM, think top 15%-top 25%. I don't care if you don't want to live in NYC. I know multiple people with decent-to-great credentials who got no callbacks in DC but several in NYC. You will not be an exception to this rule.
This is all 100% accurate.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Feb 23, 2015 3:05 pm

Soooo...Howard put more into NLJ 250 in the Class of 2014 than GW...

TTTT>>"T20"?

(Granted, NLJ250 undercounts so we should wait for LST scores, but still, this is quite the symbol)

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2014 - Meh?

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Feb 24, 2015 1:55 pm

Anonymous User wrote:I think the increase in class size really fucked some of us over.
Meh. Howard has a ton of URM and they consistently outperform their rankings.

Honestly, gw placed about the same percentage into big law last 3 years. always between 20%-22%

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”