.
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 3:11 pm
.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=230692
I'd imagine it depends on your personality. If you are the type of person who can't say no to people, can't help but give 100%, can't risk getting a bad review, can't slack, etc. etc., it'll still be miserable.dresden doll wrote:I don't have any experience with this, but I'd imagine that biglaw definitely isn't as bad when you're not petrified of losing the job. Do it for three-four years, save a ton of money, and move on to greener pastures.
Basically, what posters before me said.
IDK, I still think it's gotta be easier when you know you won't be fucked if you lose the job. I guess I could see how that wouldn't matter if you're the sort of person who has to work yourself up into a frenzy over work no matter what, however.Desert Fox wrote:I'd imagine it depends on your personality. If you are the type of person who can't say no to people, can't help but give 100%, can't risk getting a bad review, can't slack, etc. etc., it'll still be miserable.dresden doll wrote:I don't have any experience with this, but I'd imagine that biglaw definitely isn't as bad when you're not petrified of losing the job. Do it for three-four years, save a ton of money, and move on to greener pastures.
Basically, what posters before me said.
But if you can coast, bill 1800 a year, don't answer weekend emails,etc. etc. you can probably last 3 years minimum.
As someone in a very similar position to OP this + all the talk from the regulars that exit options aren't THAT great 2-3 years out scares the hell out of me.Anonymous User wrote:I'm (currently) student loan free and a junior in biglaw. I have no ambitions to stay at the firm, but it's still fucking with my head and destroying me. Worth it, glad I did it, would recommend the same to OP - but I find it's hard to turn off the type A, even if I'm not trying to be the alpha striver.
Right. This is the issue. I mean if Susman, Boies, or W&C is an option that's awesome but there is just so little information on "boutiques" as a whole.bdubs wrote:(but not always, so choose carefully).
Susman or Boies are not likely going to be "a step up in QOL."Anonymous User wrote:Right. This is the issue. I mean if Susman, Boies, or W&C is an option that's awesome but there is just so little information on "boutiques" as a whole.bdubs wrote:(but not always, so choose carefully).
Yeah I'm aware. 2400 at those places.Anonymous User wrote:Susman or Boies are not likely going to be "a step up in QOL."Anonymous User wrote:Right. This is the issue. I mean if Susman, Boies, or W&C is an option that's awesome but there is just so little information on "boutiques" as a whole.bdubs wrote:(but not always, so choose carefully).
Nothing better than talking to people. If you have an offer from a boutique you have likely talked to a lot of people who work there already. With a little bit of leg work on linkedin or the general interwebs you can usually track down a few former associates who have moved on to something else that hopefully would give you some less biased perspective. The firm may also have a reputation among its peers that is helpful to your evaluation.Anonymous User wrote:Right. This is the issue. I mean if Susman, Boies, or W&C is an option that's awesome but there is just so little information on "boutiques" as a whole.bdubs wrote:(but not always, so choose carefully).
Totally fair. Thanks. Still trying to sort out corp or lit honestly.bdubs wrote:Nothing better than talking to people. If you have an offer from a boutique you have likely talked to a lot of people who work there already. With a little bit of leg work on linkedin or the general interwebs you can usually track down a few former associates who have moved on to something else that hopefully would give you some less biased perspective. The firm may also have a reputation among its peers that is helpful to your evaluation.Anonymous User wrote:Right. This is the issue. I mean if Susman, Boies, or W&C is an option that's awesome but there is just so little information on "boutiques" as a whole.bdubs wrote:(but not always, so choose carefully).
Lack of easily accessible information shouldn't be an excuse to ignore a potentially good career option.
All great advice.bdubs wrote:Nothing better than talking to people. If you have an offer from a boutique you have likely talked to a lot of people who work there already. With a little bit of leg work on linkedin or the general interwebs you can usually track down a few former associates who have moved on to something else that hopefully would give you some less biased perspective. The firm may also have a reputation among its peers that is helpful to your evaluation.Anonymous User wrote:Right. This is the issue. I mean if Susman, Boies, or W&C is an option that's awesome but there is just so little information on "boutiques" as a whole.bdubs wrote:(but not always, so choose carefully).
Lack of easily accessible information shouldn't be an excuse to ignore a potentially good career option.