Top Law Schools

Remember, we are 100% pre-select

There is only one bidding strategy: Bid all the firms

I know it's a little early to make the thread since screeners aren't announced for a few weeks, but thought we could commiserate and answer each other's questions here.

Still bid even if you're below the posted cutoff. Because why not: there isn't a meaningful bid limit.

hoos89 wrote:Still bid even if you're below the posted cutoff. Because why not: there isn't a meaningful bid limit.

true true, will amend OP

I would love to answer this poll if I had my LRM grade.

shockingly_cavalier wrote:I would love to answer this poll if I had my LRM grade.

yeah i don't have mine either. Praise be to the lawd that our LRM exams are being graded so rigorously.

In the WUSTL OCI thread a few years ago, someone(s) went anonymous to complain about people with a lot of interviews. I personally know several people with 10+ interviews who eventually struck out at OCI. Don't be anon guy this year.

Getting a legal job is a long process, and EIW is only one possible route.

Good luck to all!

Michael Bluth wrote:In the WUSTL OCI thread a few years ago, someone(s) went anonymous to complain about people with a lot of interviews. I personally know several people with 10+ interviews who eventually struck out at OCI. Don't be anon guy this year.

Getting a legal job is a long process, and EIW is only one possible route.

Good luck to all!

This guy. He is wise.

Also, I think most people in here get this already, but slots aren't really zero-sum. Except possibly at the extreme margins. For the most part, if a firm has any interest in you, they'll make sure they're interviewing you. You, person barely inside the top 1/3, didn't narrowly lose out on a spot with Kirkland just because the a-hole at the top of the class bid on them even though he isn't really interested.

Good luck, err'body.

Michael Bluth wrote:I personally know several people with 10+ interviews who eventually struck out at OCI.

What.

cusenation wrote:

Michael Bluth wrote:I personally know several people with 10+ interviews who eventually struck out at OCI.

What.

I didn't get a CB from OCI with 17 interviews at EIW and about 5-8 more during Fall OCI. Got a few from massmailing/off campus. Moral of the story: don't be too good for Indy/Cleveland/etc. and mass-mail your ass off.

Anonymous User wrote:

cusenation wrote:

Michael Bluth wrote:I personally know several people with 10+ interviews who eventually struck out at OCI.

What.

I didn't get a CB from OCI with 17 interviews at EIW and about 5-8 more during Fall OCI. Got a few from massmailing/off campus. Moral of the story: don't be too good for Indy/Cleveland/etc. and mass-mail your ass off.

What's a Cleveland?

bulinus wrote: What's a Cleveland?

I believe it's the black dude from "Family Guy"

None of those smaller markets would consider us without ties anyway tho. It's not that we're too good, it's just fruitless. We can't even reliably place outsiders in our home market let alone markets like Cleveland

This shouldn't even be a thread. Just bid every firm. Your bid number means very little.

goldeneye wrote:This shouldn't even be a thread. Just bid every firm. Your bid number means very little.

How will I panic without the daily CB updates!?

goldeneye wrote:This shouldn't even be a thread. Just bid every firm. Your bid number means very little.

To clarify for anyone who didn't know: because all firms are preselect, the rank you put on a firm when you bid has close to 0 significance. Firms DO NOT see how you ranked them. The only conceivable way it can matter is if CSO is given authority to determine who gets to fill a last minute opening (not sure how often/ever this happens) in which case they may choose someone who ranked a firm highly.

hoos89 wrote:

goldeneye wrote:This shouldn't even be a thread. Just bid every firm. Your bid number means very little.

To clarify for anyone who didn't know: because all firms are preselect, the rank you put on a firm when you bid has close to 0 significance. Firms DO NOT see how you ranked them. The only conceivable way it can matter is if CSO is given authority to determine who gets to fill a last minute opening (not sure how often/ever this happens) in which case they may choose someone who ranked a firm highly.

Right. And résumé collect firms should receive low bidding numbers because it does not matter to get an interview.

What's the scoop on the Off-Campus interview programs? It looks like some of them are laughably small (4-5 firms). Obviously NYC is a must-do for anyone who wants a biglaw job. If you don't have ties to an area does it make sense to go to the walk arounds (ie. Texas. Who actually is from Texas?)

WheatThins wrote:What's the scoop on the Off-Campus interview programs? It looks like some of them are laughably small (4-5 firms). Obviously NYC is a must-do for anyone who wants a biglaw job. If you don't have ties to an area does it make sense to go to the walk arounds (ie. Texas. Who actually is from Texas?)

Our New England and Chicago days are pathetic. But if you're attending those days, you should definitely mass mail more firms in the city and let them know that you'll be in town at the date of our off-campus day. Could probably scoop up more interviews that way.

I think it might make sense to do the D.C. walk around since you could always say that you're attracted to DC because of the work that they do there (lots of lobby/regulatory stuff) even though you don't have ties. But it'll be harder to make an argument for a place like Atlanta...I think Texas could still be worth it if you get a screener and don't mind flying out there for it.

Probably best to do the "is it worth my time?" analysis after we bid on everything and get the screener invitations.

Before you bid on every program just because you can, I think you should consider, at a minimum, whether you would attend even if you got every single interview.

hoos89 wrote:Before you bid on every program just because you can, I think you should consider, at a minimum, whether you would attend even if you got every single interview.

I dunno about everyone else but i'm not planning on being too picky after looking at participants list and their cut-offs...Maybe if cost is a real issue, but i can't imagine there are many cases where "I'd rather risk striking out completely than work in X city or Y firm" is wise.

Here for the show

cusenation wrote:

hoos89 wrote:Before you bid on every program just because you can, I think you should consider, at a minimum, whether you would attend even if you got every single interview.

I dunno about everyone else but i'm not planning on being too picky after looking at participants list and their cut-offs...Maybe if cost is a real issue, but i can't imagine there are many cases where "I'd rather risk striking out completely than work in X city or Y firm" is wise.

Yup. This is the perspective everyone should have. Thinking you wouldn't attend even if you got every interview is not advised whatsoever.

Ask friends, family, whatever to get to every interview you get. All you need is one.

Also, in your cover letters and emails to firms not participating, absolutely say you're in town and would appreciate the opportunity to interview. There's no cost to them so do it for sure.

If money is no issue to you, then sure, but I have trouble justifying a round trip plane ticket and hotel stay for two interviews. Also, be aware that at some of the programs you're might not have sufficient free time to interview with a firm that isn't attending unless you stay in the city for an extra business day.

hoos89 wrote:If money is no issue to you, then sure, but I have trouble justifying a round trip plane ticket and hotel stay for two interviews. Also, be aware that at some of the programs you're might not have sufficient free time to interview with a firm that isn't attending unless you stay in the city for an extra business day.

That's why I said ask friends and family and whomever. 2 interviews is important enough that you should do whatever you can to get there.

Every interview is worth it. Selectively choosing is how you can end up not getting anything and then regretting you didn't interview.

No WUSTL but part of the Midwest-Cali consortium. My CSO couldn't give me any advice on the Bay Area walk around, do any of y'all have any info?