Page 1 of 3
Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 1:31 pm
by rad lulz
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 1:43 pm
by TTRansfer
Wow. That's beyond fucked up.
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 1:52 pm
by rad lulz
TTRansfer wrote:Wow. That's beyond fucked up.
That's some 2009-level chicanery
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 1:55 pm
by TTRansfer
10/23 is a huge amount, too. Did someone fuck up the decimal place when they were "calculating finances?"
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:19 pm
by PennBull
so, so shitty
i have a friend who summered there I hope she's okay
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 4:15 pm
by 84651846190
Wow, that really sucks. I guess the only bright side is that everyone is now 100% clear about Brown Rudnick being a steaming pile of shit that should be avoided at all costs.
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 4:46 pm
by LSATNightmares
Pretty low of the firm. A couple of hours before this came out on ATL, I was sitting next to someone in class who summered in one of the affected offices. I really hope he's okay, because he's smart and hardworking, but I have a feeling he's affected.
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:18 pm
by redsox
I understand why firms might get a pass for this 5 years ago...but how is this place going to manage to hire anyone next year, or the year after, or the year after that?
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:26 pm
by Fed_Atty
This is not good for those affected. At least the firm was upfront with it and did not engage in some of the other shady practices of indefinitely deferring start dates etc. At least those affected can look for other work.
To be clear, this absolutely sucks for those that it happened to and I am in no way trying to defend the firm.
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:34 pm
by Nelson
Isn't this worse than the Winston & Strawn debacle?
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:36 pm
by Jchance
redsox wrote: how is this place going to manage to hire anyone next year, or the year after, or the year after that?
If the firm hands out offers like candy and a lot of 2Ls are going to feel lucky to have even 1 offer, some offers are going to stick. #lifegoeson
Still, condolences to those who were affected.
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:37 pm
by rad lulz
redsox wrote:I understand why firms might get a pass for this 5 years ago...but how is this place going to manage to hire anyone next year, or the year after, or the year after that?
Because people want a shot at biglaw
If it's your only offer you take it
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:38 pm
by rad lulz
Nelson wrote:Isn't this worse than the Winston & Strawn debacle?
Yes
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:43 pm
by kaiser
Shame on them. Hope those 10 people land on their feet. I'm sure they will, as the firm will likely go out of their way to help place them somewhere.
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:44 pm
by mvpforme
This is terrible. I hope (but doubt) the "transition payment" is at least substantial.
Shameful.
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:48 pm
by kaiser
And firms (and businesses in general) seriously question why millenials don't seem loyal to their employers? Guess they never looked in the mirror to see the answer.
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:13 pm
by kalvano
I'm just going to link to this thread any time someone posts a questions asking if it's OK to renege on an offer.
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:26 pm
by KidStuddi
Could you imagine getting that e-mail? Ugh, I feel so bad for those 10. The timing could not be any worse if they tried.
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:33 pm
by 09042014
Part of the problem is that hiring is done over two years before you start full time. That's a huge lead time.
But this firm could have done much more than this.
First, they had to have known there was an issue long ago.
Second, they could have issue deferrals.
Third, Brown Rudnick sounds like a dirty sex act.
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:17 pm
by rad lulz
Desert Fox wrote:Part of the problem is that hiring is done over two years before you start full time. That's a huge lead time.
But this firm could have done much more than this.
First, they had to have known there was an issue long ago.
Second, they could have issue deferrals.
Third, Brown Rudnick sounds like a dirty sex act.
Yeah, one thing I was wondering is why they didn't do deferrals
Maybe because since the recession there is now a different understanding that firms aren't really supposed to give a crap about anyone?
I dunno
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:30 pm
by 09042014
rad lulz wrote:Desert Fox wrote:Part of the problem is that hiring is done over two years before you start full time. That's a huge lead time.
But this firm could have done much more than this.
First, they had to have known there was an issue long ago.
Second, they could have issue deferrals.
Third, Brown Rudnick sounds like a dirty sex act.
Yeah, one thing I was wondering is why they didn't do deferrals
Maybe because since the recession there is now a different understanding that firms are really supposed to give a crap about anyone?
I dunno
The answer is probably that firms who treated their associates like shit didn't pay a penalty during the recession. Latham was "that place that fires you" for exactly 1 OCI period and then it was "a brona fide prefstigious firm."
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:31 pm
by dresden doll
kaiser wrote:And firms (and businesses in general) seriously question why millenials don't seem loyal to their employers? Guess they never looked in the mirror to see the answer.
Someone actually still has the gall to talk employer loyalty?
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:31 pm
by bk1
rad lulz wrote:redsox wrote:I understand why firms might get a pass for this 5 years ago...but how is this place going to manage to hire anyone next year, or the year after, or the year after that?
Because people want a shot at biglaw
If it's your only offer you take it
This. Not everyone has the luxury of choosing between biglaw firms. In fact most people don't even get to choose a single biglaw firm.
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:43 pm
by Nomo
People thought no one would go to Latham after they laid off 440 people. But, people with great credentials are still lining up.
Firms can no-offer, rescind offers, layoff lawyers, conduct stealth layoffs, whatever. It doesn't matter. They'll take a hit to who they can recruit for a couple years - but if they're pulling this they probably don't need many people for a couple years anyways. In 3 years it will seem like ancient history. And there will be other firms with more recent transgressions that are on everyone's mind.
Re: Brown Rudnick rescinds 10/23 offers rights before graduation
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:46 pm
by redsox
bk1 wrote:rad lulz wrote:redsox wrote:I understand why firms might get a pass for this 5 years ago...but how is this place going to manage to hire anyone next year, or the year after, or the year after that?
Because people want a shot at biglaw
If it's your only offer you take it
This. Not everyone has the luxury of choosing between biglaw firms. In fact most people don't even get to choose a single biglaw firm.
I guess. Just surprises me that a couple million dollars of associate salary is worth never being able to hire anyone with more than one offer again. I'd also like to see law schools stop letting them recruit on campus.